This case study evaluates Crosby Kids (CK), a private LinkedIn-based mentorship community that links journalism students at a historically Black university with alumni professionals. Grounded in Social Identity Theory, it examines engagement, perceived value, and career outcomes. Survey and qualitative data were analyzed using dual AI platforms under human supervision to enhance transparency. Findings show sustained engagement through active participation and strategic observation. Among internship students who completed structured professional development before joining CK, 40% reported securing a job or internship. Results suggest LinkedIn can support professional identity development and career readiness in a scalable mentorship environment.
AgrestiA. (2019). Statistical methods for the social sciences (5th ed.). Pearson.
2.
American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code
3.
AstinA. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 25, 297–308.
4.
BergerJ. B.MilemJ. F. (1999). The role of student involvement and perceptions of integration in a causal model of student persistence. Research in Higher Education, 40(6), 641–664. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018708813716
5.
BranchuC.FlaureauE. (2022). I’m not listening to my teacher, I’m listening to my computer: Online learning, disengagement, and the impact of COVID-19 on French university students. Higher Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00854-4
ConnerK. (2015). Expectations and experiences of undergraduate students who participated in an alumni mentoring program [Doctoral dissertation, University of San Francisco]. University of San Francisco Scholarship Repository. https://repository.usfca.edu/diss/123
DollingerM.ArkoudisS.MarangellS. (2019). University alumni mentoring programs: A win-win?Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 41(4), 375–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2019.1617657
10.
FeltyS. M. (2019). Social identity theory and intergroup conflict in Israel/Palestine [Master’s thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA]. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1073622.pdf
GrayB.GrayS.KellermanA. (2013). Online lurking: Understanding non-visible participation in online communities. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 119–126.
13.
GreeneT. G.MartiC. N.McClenneyK. (2016). The effort–outcome gap: Differences for African American and Hispanic community college students in student engagement and academic achievement. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 513–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2008.11772115
14.
Herrera-PoyatosD.Peláez-GonzálezC.ZuherosC.Herrera-PoyatosA.TejedorV.HerreraF.MontesR. (2025). An overview of model uncertainty and variability in LLM-based sentiment analysis: Challenges, mitigation strategies, and the role of explainability (Version 1) [Preprint]. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.04462v1
15.
JobeirB.GhandourM.BjoernM. (2024). A new frontier in biostatistics: Evaluating the accuracy of ChatGPT-4 vs. R in analyzing liver resection data. Journal of Global Health Economics and Policy, 4, Article e2024005.
16.
KoçakD. (2025). Examination of ChatGPT’s performance as a data analysis tool. Educational and psychological measurement, 85(4), 641–671. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644241302721
MartinA. J. (2023). University students’ motivation and engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic: The roles of lockdown, isolation, and remote and hybrid learning. Australian Journal of Education, 67(2), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/00049441231179791
NonneckeB.PreeceJ.AndrewsD. (2006). What lurkers and posters think of each other. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1–10). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2006.157
24.
NultyD. D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: What can be done?Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701293231
PangB.LeeL. (2008). Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2(1–2), 1–135. https://doi.org/10.1561/1500000011
PreeceJ.ShneidermanB. (2009). The reader-to-leader framework: Motivating technology-mediated social participation. AIS Transactions on Human–computer Interaction, 1(1), 13–32.
29.
SeboP.WangT. (2025). ChatGPT’s performance in sample size estimation: A preliminary study on the capabilities of artificial intelligence. Family Practice, 42(5), cmaf069. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmaf069
SunN.RauP. L. P.MaL. Y. (2014). Understanding lurkers in online communities: A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.022
34.
SwannW. B.JrBuhrmesterM. D.GómezA.JettenJ.BastianB.VázquezA.AriyantoA.BestaT.ChristO.CuiL.FinchilescuG.GonzálezR.GotoN.HornseyM.SharmaS.SusiantoH.ZhangA. (2014). What makes a group worth dying for? Identity fusion fosters perception of familial ties, promoting self-sacrifice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(6), 912–926. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036089
35.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.
36.
The Power of Digital Silence: A Conceptual Examination of Silent Users (Lurkers). (2025). SSRJ—Social Sciences Research Journal—E—ISSN: 2147—5237—Frequency: Continuous Publication—Dates of Publication: International Academic Journal, 14(1), 102–110. https://socialsciencesresearchjournal.com/index.php/ssrj/article/view/879
37.
WimmerR. D.DominickJ. R. (2014). Mass media research (10th ed.). Cengage.
38.
YinR. (2003). Case study research (3rd ed.). Sage.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
