Little research exists about embedded remediation (ER) in college journalism and mass communication (JMC) programs. ER could support students who are underprepared for college-level writing. Because ER would affect faculty’s professional practice, this study explored its feasibility by investigating JMC faculty perceptions of ER and its feasibility. Qualitative inquiry via focus groups with a purposeful sample (n = 17) was used to explore perceptions and barriers to implementation and a conceptual framework including Experiential Learning Theory and the Teaching-for-Learning model was used in analysis. Four themes were identified: (a) growing concerns, (b) externalizing remediation, (c) institutional challenges, and (d) taking action.
AbernathyA. (2022). Teaching in a remediation nation: Exploring journalism and mass communication faculty perceptions of their professional practice [Doctoral dissertation, University of Mississippi]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
2.
BickerstaffS.BealK.RaufmanJ.LewyE. B.SlaughterA. (2022). Five principles for reforming developmental education.
3.
BlakeN. (2016). Embedded remediation: A new Paradigm. NADE Digest, 8(1), 22–27.
4.
BloomB. S.KrathwohlD. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, by a committee of college and university examiners. In Handbook I: Cognitive domain. Longmans, Green.
5.
BoatmanA.LongB. T. (2018). Does remediation work for all students? How the effects of postsecondary remedial and developmental courses vary by level of academic preparation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(1), 29–58.
6.
CavazosJ.Jr.JohnsonM. B.SparrowG. S. (2010). Overcoming personal and academic challenges: Perspectives from Latina/o college students. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 9(4), 304–316.
7.
ConradC. F.JohnsonJ.GuptaD. M. (2011). Teaching-for-Learning (TFL): A model for faculty to advance student learning. In HarperS. R.JacksonJ. F. (Eds.), Introduction to American higher education (pp. 173–183). Routledge.
8.
CreswellJ. W.CreswellJ. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
9.
DuncheonJ. C.TierneyW. G. (2014, July). Examining college writing readiness. The Educational Forum, 78(3), 210–230.
FinkL. D. (2013). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. John Wiley.
12.
GlesneC. (2016). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. Pearson.
13.
JaggarsS. S.BickerstaffS. (2018). Developmental education: The evolution of research and reform. In PaulsenM. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 33, pp. 469–503). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72490-4_10
LingwallA. (2010). Rigor or remediation? Exploring writing proficiency and assessment measures in journalism and mass communication programs. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 65(3–4), 283–302.
19.
MerveK. A. R. A. (2019). A systematic literature review: Constructivism in multidisciplinary learning environments. International Journal of Academic Research in Education, 4(1–2), 19–26.
20.
MoorheadL. (2020). Peer-based learning in reporting class. Teaching Journalism & Mass Communication, 10(1), 8–20.
21.
PerezE. B.ToH.FowlerM.LarriveeL. (2018). Mathcourse for liberal arts majors: A pilot with embedded remediation. Numeracy, 11(1), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.11.1.6
RellesS. R. (2016). Rethinking postsecondary remediation: Exploring an experiential learning approach to college writing. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 64(3), 172–180.
SaldañaJ. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
27.
StrayhornT. L. (2014). Modeling the determinants of college readiness for historically underrepresented students at 4-year colleges and universities: A national investigation. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(8), 972–993.
