Large variations in mobile users, mobile devices, and course content make generalizations about mobile learning difficult. Prior to the international pandemic that forced more virtual and mobile instruction, this exploratory study measured how students in one journalism and one English composition course at two universities responded to completing writing assignments using only their phones. Although pre and post differences in student attitudes and engagement between the writing courses were insignificant, further analyses of age differences (freshman vs seniors) revealed significant variance. These results suggest only a 3-year time span could determine how much students embrace mobile assignments.
AttewellJ. (2005). Mobile technologies and learning: A technology update and m-learning project summary. Learning and Skills Development Agency.
2.
BasogluE. B.AkdemirÖ. (2010). A comparison of undergraduate students’ English vocabulary learning: Using mobile phones and flashcards. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3), 1–7.
ItoM.GutierrezK.LivingstoneS.PenuelB.RhodesJ.SalenK.Sefton-GreenJ.WatkinsS. C. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design (p. 128). Digital Media and Learning Research Hub. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/48114/
KraushaarJ.NovakD. (2010). Examining the affects of student multitasking with laptops during the lecture. Journal of Information Systems Education, 21(2), 242–251.
11.
McCoyB. R. (2016). Digital distractions in the classroom phase II: Student classroom use of digital devices for non-class related purposes. Journal of Media Education, 7(1), 5–32.
SharplesM.Arnedillo-SanchezI.MilradM.VavoulaG. (2009). Mobile learning. In BalacheffN.LudvigsenS.de JongT.LazonderA.BarnesS. (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning (pp. 233–249). Springer
14.
ShaverJ. P. (1990). Reliability and validity of measures of attitudes toward writing and toward writing with the computer. Written Communication, 7(3), 375–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088390007003004
15.
WiteckiG.NonneckeB. (2015). Engagement in digital lecture halls: A study of student course engagement and mobile device use during lecture. Journal of Information Technology Education, 14, 73–90.
16.
WoodE.ZivcakovaL.GentileP.ArcherK.De PasqualeD.NoskoA. (2012). Examining the impact of off-task multi-tasking with technology on real-time classroom learning. Computers & Education, 58(1), 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.029
17.
YangS. H. (2012). Exploring college students’ attitudes and self-efficacy of mobile learning. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ989264.pdf
18.
YarosR. A. (2010). Student engagement using multiple technologies [Paper presentation]. Annual Learning Technology Consortium of Twelve Universities, College Park, MD, United States.
19.
YarosR. A. (2012a). Effects of mobile devices and text messages: A multi-study design to explore a model for mobile learning in introductory journalism. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology, and Learning, 2(3), 59–72.
20.
YarosR. A. (2012b). Social media and education: Do personalization and interactivity facilitate learning?. In Noor Al-DeenH. S.HendricksJ. A. (Eds.), Social media: Usage and impact (pp. 57–74). Lexington Books.
