Using a quasi-experiment, this research looks at grades and student satisfaction over the course of six semesters in a college-level writing class. Three of the classes were taught traditionally, and the other three classes utilized the flipped classroom concept. All classes were taught by the same instructor. Using independent samples t tests, results indicate that students received higher grades and had more satisfaction in the traditional classroom.
AndersA. (2016). Flipping the composing process: Collaborative drafting and resume writing. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 79, 102-118. doi:10.117/2329490615602251
2.
ArduserL. (2016). Flipping the class: A new media pedagogy. Business and Professional Communications Quarterly, 79, 217-233. doi:10.1177/2329490615624110
BalzottiJ. M.McCoolL. B. (2016). Using digital learning platforms to extend the flipped classroom. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 79, 68-80. doi:10.117/2329490615606497
5.
BaytiyehH. (2017). The flipped classroom model: When technology enhances professional skills. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 34, 51-62. doi:10.1108/IJILT-07-2016-0025
6.
BedggoodR.DonovanJ. (2012). University performance evaluations: What are we really measuring?Studies in Higher Education, 37, 825-842.
7.
BernardJ. S. (2015). The flipped classroom: Fertile ground for nursing education research. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 12, 99-109. doi:10.1515/ijnes-2015-0005
8.
BishopJ. L.VerlegerM. A. (2013, June23-26). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. Presented at the 120th American Society for Engineering Education annual conference & exposition, Atlanta, GA.
9.
BrooksA. (2014). Information literacy and the flipped classroom: Examining the impact of a one-shot flipped class on student learning and perceptions. Communications in Information Literacy, 8, 225-235. doi:10.15760/comminfolit.2014.8.2.168
10.
BurkeP. (2015). Flipped @ SBU: Student satisfaction and the college classroom. Educational Research Quarterly, 39(2), 36-52.
11.
CamielL. D.MistryA.SchneeD.TataronisG.TaglieriC.ZaikenK.. . .GoldmanJ. (2016). Instructional design and assessment: Students’ attitudes, academic performance and preferences for content delivery in a very large self-care course redesign. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 90(4), Article 67.
12.
DaviesR. S.DeanD. L.BallN. (2013). Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educational Technology Research & Development, 61, 563-580. doi:10.1007/s11423-013-9305-6
13.
EnfieldJ. (2013). Looking at the impact of the flipped classroom model of instruction on undergraduate multimedia students at CSUN. TechTrends, 57(6), 14-27. doi:10.1007/s11528-013-0698-1
FultonK. (2012). Upside down and inside out: Flip your classroom to improve student learning. Learning & Leading With Technology, 39, 12-17.
16.
GreerA. G.PokornyM.ClayM. C.BrownS.SteeleL. L. (2010). Learner-centered characteristics of nurse educators. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 7(1), Article 6. doi:10.2202/1548-923X.1710
17.
HarwoodK. J.McDonaldP. L.ButlerJ. T.DragoD.SchlumpfK. S. (2018). Comparing student outcomes in traditional vs intensive, online graduate programs in health professional education. BMC Medical Education, 18, Article 240. doi:10.1186/s12909-018-1343-7
18.
HaughtonJ.KellyA. (2015). Student performance in the introductory business statistics course: Does delivery mode matter?Journal of Education for Business, 90, 31-43. doi:10.1080/08832323.2014.968518
19.
HeyborneW. H.PerrettJ. J. (2016). To flip or not to flip? Analysis of a flipped classroom pedagogy in a general biology course. Journal of College Science Teaching, 45(4), 31-37. doi:10.2505/4/jcst16_045_04_31
20.
KaratasS. (2005). Comparisons of internet-based and face-to-face learning systems based on “equivalency of experiences” according to students’ academic achievements and satisfactions (Doctoral dissertation). Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
21.
KooC. L.DempsE. L.FarrisC.BowmanJ. D.PanahiL.BoyleP. (2016). Impact of flipped classroom design on student performance and perceptions in a pharmacotherapy course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 80(2), Article 33. doi:10.5688/ajpe80233
22.
MillardE. (2012, December). 5 reasons flipped classrooms work: Turning lectures into homework to boost student engagement and increase technology-fueled creativity. University Business, 15(11), 26-29.
23.
MilmanN. (2012). The flipped classroom strategy: What is it and how can it be used?Distance Learning, 9(3), 85-87.
24.
PetersonD. J. (2016). The flipped classroom improves student achievement and course satisfaction in a statistics course: A quasi-experimental study. Teaching of Psychology, 43, 10-15. doi:10.1177/0098628315620063
25.
PierceR.FoxJ. (2012). Vodcasts and active-learning exercises in a “flipped classroom” model of a renal pharmacotherapy module. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 76(10), 196. doi:10.5688/ajpe7610196
26.
Prud’homme-GénéreuxA. (2016). Student-produced videos for the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 45(3), 58-62.
27.
RiveraE. (2017). Flipping the classroom in freshman English library instruction: A comparison study of a flipped class versus a traditional lecture method. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 23, 18-27. doi:10.1080/13614533.2016.1244770
28.
RotellarC.CainJ. (2016). Research, perspectives, and recommendations on implementing the flipped classroom. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 80(2), 34. doi:10.5688/ajpe80234
29.
SchroederS. J. (2012). Infusing learner-centered strategies into the classroom. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 26, 218-223. doi:10.3109/07380577.2012.725880
30.
SchultzD.DuffieldS.RamussenS. C.WagemanJ. (2014). Effects of the flipped classroom model on student performance for advanced placement high school chemistry students. Journal of Chemical Education, 91, 1334-1339.
31.
SivapalanS. (2017). Sustainability, blended learning and the undergraduate communication skills classroom: Negotiating engineering undergraduates’ expectations and perceptions. On the Horizon, 25(1), 7-23. doi:10.1108/OTH-08-2016-0045
32.
YilmazR. (2017). Exploring the role of e-learning readiness on student satisfaction and motivation in the flipped classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 251-260. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.085
33.
ZhonggenY.GuifangW. (2016). Academic achievements and satisfaction of the clicker-aided flipped business English writing class. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19, 298-312.
