This experiment explores whether vivid writing can improve ethical reasoning by testing it in public relations against non-vivid writing, alone and in combination with pictures. Vivid writing has effects similar to photographs on attention, memory, emotion, and persuasion; this study explores whether vivid writing effects includes one of the more important effects that photographs can have—improving ethical reasoning. Results show non-vivid writing alone raised participants’ moral judgment, however photographs increased participants’ perceptions of the issues as morally important. Vivid writing did increase participants’ empathy, and empathy was related to support for the organization. Photographs increased participants’ perception of the issue as morally important.
AmitE.GreeneJ. D. (2012). You see, the ends don’t justify the means: Visual imagery and moral judgment. Psychological Science, 23, 861-868.
2.
BaileyG. A.LichtyL. (1972). Rough justice on a Saigon street: A gatekeeper study of NBC’s tet execution. Journalism Quarterly, 49, 221-229.
3.
BaileyJ. O.BailensonJ. N.FloraJ.ArmelK. C.VoelkerD.ReevesB. (2015). The impact of vivid messages on reducing energy consumption related to hot water use. Environment & Behavior, 47, 570-592.
4.
BarnettT. (2001). Dimensions of moral intensity and ethical decision making: An empirical study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 1038-1057.
5.
BarnhurstK. G. (1994). Seeing the newspaper. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
6.
BatsonD. (1987). Self-report ratings of empathic emotion. In EisenbergN.StrayerJ. (Eds.), Empathy and its development (pp. 356-360). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BennettE. M.SwensonJ. D.WilkinsonJ. S. (1992). Is the medium the message? An experimental test with morbid news. Journalism Quarterly, 69, 921-928.
8.
BohleR. H.GarciaM. R. (1987). Reader response to color halftones and spot color in newspaper design. Journalism Quarterly, 64, 731-739.
9.
CabotM. (2005). Moral development and PR ethics. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 20, 321-332.
10.
ColemanR. (2003). Race and ethical reasoning: The importance of race to journalistic decision making. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80, 295-310.
11.
ColemanR. (2006). The effect of visuals on ethical reasoning: What’s a photograph worth to journalists making moral decisions?Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83, 835-850.
12.
ColemanR. (2011a). Color blind: Race and the ethical reasoning of African Americans on journalism dilemmas. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 88, 337-351.
13.
ColemanR. (2011b). The moral judgment of minority journalists: Evidence from Asian American, Black, and Hispanic professional journalists. Mass Communication and Society, 14, 578-599.
14.
CupchikG. C.LeonardG.AxelradE.KalinJ. D. (1998). The landscape of emotion in literary encounters. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 825-847.
15.
DamasioA. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York, NY: Putnam.
16.
DavidP.KangJ. (1998). Pictures, high-imagery news language and news recall. Newspaper Research Journal, 19(3), 21-30.
17.
DeLucaK. (1999). Image politics: The new rhetoric of environmental activism. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
18.
DomkeD.PerlmutterD.SprattM. (2002). The primes of our times? An examination of the “power” of visual images. Journalism, 3, 131-159.
19.
DyckE.ColdevinG. (1992). Using positive vs. negative photographs for Third-World fundraising. Journalism Quarterly, 69, 572-579.
20.
FisherR. J.VandenboschM.AntiaK. D. (2008). An empathy-helping perspective on consumers’ responses to fundraising appeals. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 519-531.
21.
FiskeS. T. (1982). Schema-triggered affect: Applications to social perception. In ClarkM. S. (Ed.), Affect and cognition: The seventeenth annual Carnegie Symposium on cognition (pp. 55-78). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
FreemanC. P. (2009). A greater means to the greater good: Ethical guidelines to meet social movement organization advocacy challenges. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 24, 269-288.
23.
GibsonR.ZillmannD. (2000). Reading between the photographs: The influence of incidental pictorial information on issue perception. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 355-366.
24.
GordonR. M. (1986). Folk psychology as simulation. Mind & Language, 1, 158-171.
25.
GreeneJ. D.HaidtJ. (2002). How (and where) does moral judgment work?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 517-523.
26.
GreeneJ. D.NystromL. E.EngellA. D.DarleyJ. M.CohenJ. D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44, 389-400.
27.
GreeneJ. D.SommervilleR. B.NystromL. E.DarleyJ. M.CohenJ. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105-2108.
28.
GrimesT.DrechselR. (1996). Word-picture juxtaposition, schemata, and defamation in television news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 73, 169-180.
29.
GronbeckB. F. (1995). Rhetoric, ethics, and telespectacles in the post-everything age. In BrownR. H. (Ed.), Postmodern representations: Truth, power, and mimesis in the human sciences and public culture (pp. 217-238). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
30.
GubbinsE.ByrneR. M. J. (2014). Dual processes of emotion and reason in judgments about moral dilemmas. Thinking & Reasoning, 20, 245-268.
31.
HaidtJ. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814-834.
32.
HaidtJ. (2003). The moral emotions. In DavidsonR. J.SchererK. R.GoldsmithH. H. (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 852-870). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33.
HoffmanM. L. (1984). Interaction of affect and cognition in empathy. In IzardC. E.KaganJ.ZajoncR. B. (Eds.), Emotions, cognition and behavior (pp. 103-131). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34.
HoffmanM. L. (1997). Empathy, its development and prosocial implications. In HoweH.E.Jr. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 25, pp. 169-217). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
35.
HoffmanM. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36.
JajdelskaE.ButlerC.KellyS.McNeillA.OveryK. (2010). Crying, moving, and keeping it whole: What makes literary description vivid?Poetics Today, 31, 433-463.
37.
JamiesonK. H. (1988). Eloquence in an electronic age. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
38.
JohnsonJ. D.OlivoN.GibsonN.ReedW.Ashburn-NardoL. (2009). Priming media stereotypes reduces support for social welfare policies: The mediating role of empathy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 463-476.
39.
JonesT. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16, 366-395.
40.
KahnemanD.FredrickS. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In GilovichT.GriffinD.KahnemanD. (Eds.), Heuristics and biases (pp. 49-81). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
41.
KellerP. A.BlockL. G. (1997). Vividness effects: A resource-matching perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 295-304.
42.
KeltnerD.EllsworthP. C.EdwardsK. (1993). Beyond simple pessimism: Effects of sadness and anger on social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 740-752.
43.
KiE.Childers HonL. (2007). Testing the linkages among the organization-public relationship and attitude and behavioral intentions. Journal of Public Relations Research, 19, 1-23.
44.
KohlbergL. (1981). The philosophy of moral development: Moral stages and the idea of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harper & Row.
45.
KohlbergL. (1984). Essays on Moral Development, Vol. 2: The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
46.
KrcmarM. (2013). The effect of media on children’s moral reasoning. In TamboriniR. (Ed.), Media and the moral mind (pp. 198-217). New York, NY: Routledge.
47.
KurbyC. A.BrittA.MaglianoJ. P. (2005). The role of top-down and bottom-up processes in between-text integration. Reading Psychology, 26, 335-362.
48.
LarocqueP. (2008, May). Creating pictures with words. Quill, p. 30.
49.
MarR. A.OatleyK. (2008). The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 173-192.
50.
MarcusG. E.NeumanW. R.MacKuenM. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
51.
MeaderA.KnightL.ColemanR.WilkinsL. (2015). Ethics in the digital age: A comparison of the effects of moving images and photographs on moral judgment. Journal of Media Ethics, 30, 234-251.
52.
MendelsonA. (2001). Effects of novelty in news photographs on attention and memory. Media Psychology, 3, 119-157.
53.
MobergD. J.SeabrightM. A. (2000). The development of moral imagination. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10, 845-884.
54.
MooreA. B.ClarkB. A.KaneM. J. (2008). Who shalt not kill? Individual differences in working memory capacity, executive control, and moral judgment. Psychological Science, 19, 549-557.
55.
NarvaezD.GleasonT. (2007). The relation of moral judgment development and educational experience to recall of moral narratives and expository texts. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 168, 251-276.
56.
NisbettR. E.RossL. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
57.
PaivioA. (1979). Imagery and verbal processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
58.
PaivioA. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
59.
PaivioA. (1990). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
60.
PaivioA.CsapoK. (1973). Picture superiority in free recall: Imagery or dual coding?Cognitive Psychology, 5, 176-206.
61.
PardalesM. J. (2002). “So, how did you arrive at that decision?” Connecting moral imagination and moral judgement. Journal of Moral Education, 31, 423-437.
62.
PerlmutterD. (1998). Photojournalism and foreign policy: Framing icons of outrage in international crisis. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
63.
PerlmutterD. (2005). Photojournalism and public affairs. Orbis, 49, 109-122.
64.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
65.
PiagetJ. (1965). The moral judgment of the child. New York, NY: The Free Press.
66.
PizarroD. (2000). Nothing more than feelings? The role of emotions in moral judgment. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 30, 355-375.
67.
RestJ. R. (1994). Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
68.
RestJ. R.BebeauM. J.ThomaS. J. (1999). Postconventional moral thinking: A neo-Kohlbergian approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
69.
RestJ. R.NarvaezD. (1984). Supplement to guide for DIT-1. Minneapolis: Center for the Study of Ethical Development, University of Minnesota.
70.
ReyesR. M.ThompsonW. L.BowerG. H. (1980). Judgmental biases resulting from differing availabilities of arguments. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 39, 2-12.
71.
RoderoE. (2012). See it on a radio story: Sound effects and shots to evoked imagery and attention on audio fiction. Communication Research, 39, 458-479.
72.
Sadler-TrainorG. (2005). A visual overdose? Visual communications in public relations. Public Relations Quarterly, 50(4), 7-9.
73.
SchudsonM. (2001). The objectivity norm in American journalism. Journalism, 2, 149-170.
74.
SheppardS. R. J. (2005). Landscape visualisation and climate change: The potential for influencing perceptions and behaviour. Environmental Science & Policy, 8, 637-654.
75.
SiemerM.ReisenzeinR. (2007). The process of emotion inference. Emotion, 7(1), 1-20.
76.
SmithR. D. (2003). Becoming a public relations writer: A writing process workbook for the profession. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
77.
StrackF.SchwarzN.GschneidingerE. (1985). Happiness and reminiscing: The role of time perspective, affect, and mode of thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1460-1469.
78.
TakadaJ.LevineT. (2007). The effects of the even-a-few-minutes-would-help strategy, perspective taking, and empathic concern on the successful recruiting of volunteers on campus. Communication Research Reports, 24, 177-184.
79.
TaylorS. E.ThompsonS. C. (1982). Stalking the elusive “vividness” effect. Psychological Review, 89, 155-181.
80.
ThomaS. (1986). Estimating gender differences in the comprehension and preference of moral issues. Developmental Review, 6, 165-180.
81.
van GelderJ.-L.HershfieldH. E.NordgrenL. F. (2013). Vividness of the future self predicts delinquency. Psychological Science, 24, 974-980.
82.
WispeL. (1986). The distinction between sympathy and empathy: To call forth a concept, a word is needed. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 314-321.
83.
YangH. A.WuW. A. (2009). The effect of moral intensity on ethical decision making in accounting. Journal of Moral Education, 38, 335-351.
84.
ZappalaJ. N.CardenA. R. (2009). Public relations writing worktext: A practical guide for the profession (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
85.
ZillmannD.KnoblochS.YuH. S. (2001). Effects of photographs on the selective reading of news reports. Media Psychology, 3, 301-324.
