A survey (N = 524) examined how frequently college students engage in multitasking with social media, texting/instant messaging (IM), and music while studying/working and what motivates them to multitask with each medium. Four out of five participants multitasked with Facebook and texting/IM, and two out of three multitasked with music. Habit was the strongest motivation for multitasking that positively predicted multitasking frequency. Overall, multitasking with Facebook, texting/IM, and music differed by motivations. Multitasking with music was associated with entertainment and efficiency needs, while multitasking with Facebook/texting/IM was related to satisfying socialization, passing time, and escaping needs.
AlbarranA. B.AndersonT.BejarL. G.BussartA. L.DaggettE.GibsonS.. . .WayH. (2007). “What happened to our audience?” Radio and new technology uses and gratifications among young adult users. Journal of Radio Studies, 14, 92-101.
2.
ArmstrongG. B.BoriarskyG. A.MaresM. (1991). Background television and reading performance. Communication Monographs, 58, 235-253.
3.
ArmstrongG. B.ChungL. (2000). Background television and reading memory in context: Assessing TV interference and facilitative context effects on encoding versus retrieval processes. Communication Research, 27, 327-352.
4.
ArmstrongG. B.SoporyP. (1997). Effects of background television on phonological and visuo-spatial working memory. Communication Research, 24, 459-480.
5.
BardhiF.RohmA. J.SultanF. (2010). Tuning in and tuning out: Media multitasking among young consumers. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 9, 316-332.
6.
BowmanL. L.LevineL. E.WaiteB. M.GendronM. (2010). Can students really multitask? An experimental study of instant messaging while reading. Computers & Education, 54, 927-931.
7.
CarrierL. M.CheeverN. A.RosenL. D.BenitezS.ChangJ. (2009). Multitasking across generations: Multitasking choices and difficulty ratings in three generations of Americans. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 483-489.
8.
CharneyT.GreenbergB. S. (2001). Uses and gratifications of the Internet. In LinC.AtkinD. (Eds.), Communication, technology and society: New media adoption and uses. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 379-407.
EllisonN. B.SteinfieldC.LampeC. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143-1168.
12.
EvansJ. R.MathurA. (2005). The value of online surveys. Internet Research, 15, 195-219.
13.
FlanaginA. J. (2005). IM online: Instant messaging use among college students. Communication Research Reports, 22, 175-187.
14.
FoehrU. G. (2006). Media multitasking among American youth: Prevalence, predictors and pairings. Menlo Park, CA: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
15.
FurnhamA.BradleyA. (1997). Music while you work: The differential distraction of background music on the cognitive test performance of introverts and extraverts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 445-455.
16.
FurnhamA.GunterB.PetersonE. (1994). Television distraction and the performance of introverts and extroverts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 705-711.
17.
HansonT. L.DrumhellerK.MallardJ.McKeeC.SchlegelP. (2010). Cell phones, text messaging, and Facebook: Competing time demands of today’s college students. College Teaching, 59, 23-30.
18.
HrastinskiS. (2006). Introducing an informal synchronous medium in a distance learning course: How is participation affected?The Internet and Higher Education, 9, 117-131.
19.
JeongS. J.FishbeinM. (2007). Predictors of multitasking with media: Media factors and audience factors. Media Psychology, 10, 364-384.
20.
JonesS.MaddenM. (2002). The Internet goes to college: How students are living in the future with today’s technology. Collingdale, PA: Diane Publishing.
21.
JuncoR.CottenS. R. (2011). Perceived academic effects of instant messaging use. Computers & Education, 56, 370-378.
22.
KatzE. (1959). Mass communications research and the study of popular culture: An editorial note on a possible future for this journal. Studies in Public Communication, 2, 1-6.
23.
KatzE.BlumlerJ. G.GurevitchM. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 37, 509-523.
24.
KononovaA.ChiangY. H. (2015). Why do we multitask with media? Predictors of media multitasking among Internet users in the United States and Taiwan. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 31-41.
25.
KononovaA.ZasorinaT.DiveevaN.KokoevaA.ChelokyanA. (2014). Multitasking goes global: Multitasking with traditional and new electronic media and attention to media messages among college students in Kuwait, Russia, and the USA. International Communication Gazette, 76, 617-640.
LevineL. E.WaiteB. M.BowmanL. L. (2007). Electronic media use, reading, and academic distractibility in college youth. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, 560-566.
28.
MokhtariK.DelelloJ.ReichardC. (2015). Connected yet distracted: Multitasking among college students. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 45, 164-180.
29.
MokhtariK.ReichardC. A.GardnerA. (2009). The impact of Internet and television use on the reading habits and practices of college students. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52, 609-619.
30.
OldhamG. R.CummingsA.MischelL. J.SchmidtkeJ. M.ZhouJ. (1995). Listen while you work? Quasi-experimental relations between personal-stereo headset use and employee work responses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 547-564.
31.
PapacharissiZ.MendesonA. (2011). Toward a new(er) sociability: Uses, gratifications and social capital on Facebook. In PapathanassopoulosS. (Ed.), Media perspectives for the 21st century. London, England: Routledge, 212-230.
32.
PapacharissiZ.RubinA. M. (2000). Predictors of Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44, 175-196.
33.
ParkN.KeeK. F.ValenzuelaS. (2009). Being immersed in social networking environment: Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12, 729-733.
34.
PempekT. A.YermolayevaY. A.CalvertS. L. (2009). College students social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 227-238.
35.
PoolM. M.KoolstraC. M.van der VoortT. H. (2003). The impact of background radio and television on high school students’ homework performance. Journal of Communication, 53, 74-87.
36.
Quan-HaaseA. (2007). University students’ local and distant social ties: Using and integrating modes of communication on campus. Information, Communication & Society, 10, 671-693.
37.
Quan-HaaseA.YoungA. L. (2010). Uses and gratifications of social media: A comparison of Facebook and instant messaging. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30, 350-361.
38.
RobertsD. F.FoehrU. G.RideoutV. J. (2005). Generation M: Media in the lives of 8-18 year-olds. Menlo Park, CA: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
39.
RogersR. D.MonsellS. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
40.
RosenL. D.CarrierL. M.CheeverN. A. (2013). Facebook and texting made me do it: Media-induced task-switching while studying. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 948-958.
41.
RuggieroT. E. (2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication and Society, 3, 3-37.
42.
SchellenbergE. G. (2001). Music and nonmusical abilities. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 930, 355-371.
43.
SchellenbergE. G. (2005). Music and cognitive abilities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 317-320.
44.
ShaoG. (2008). Understanding the appeal of user-generated media: A uses and gratifications perspective. Internet Research, 19, 7-25.
45.
SheldonP. (2008). Facebook favorite: Facebook and motives for its use. Southwestern Journal of Mass Communication, 23(3), 39-53.
StaffordT. F.StaffordM. R.SchkadeL. L. (2004). Determining uses and gratifications for the Internet. Decision Sciences, 35, 259-288.
48.
TomatisA. (1991). Pourquoi Mozart? [Why Mozart?], Paris, France: Ergo Press.
49.
UristaM. A.DongQ.DayK. D. (2009). Explaining why young adults use MySpace and Facebook through uses and gratifications theory. Human Communication, 12, 215-229.
WangZ.TchernevJ. M. (2012). The “myth” of media multitasking: Reciprocal dynamics of media multitasking, personal needs, and gratifications. Journal of Communication, 62, 493-513.
52.
WileyC.SissonM. (2006, November). Ethics, accuracy and assumption: The use of Facebook by students and employers. Southwestern Ohio Council for Higher Education Special Topics Forum, Dayton.
53.
WrightK. B. (2005). Researching Internet-based populations: Advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3). doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00259.x
54.
ZhangW.JeongS. H.FishbeinM. (2010). Situational factors competing for attention: The interaction effect of multitasking and sexually explicit content on TV recognition. Journal of Media Psychology, 22, 2-13.
