Take a Break: Examining College Students’ Media Multitasking Activities and Motivations During Study- or Work-Related Tasks

Abstract

A survey (N = 524) examined how frequently college students engage in multitasking with social media, texting/instant messaging (IM), and music while studying/working and what motivates them to multitask with each medium. Four out of five participants multitasked with Facebook and texting/IM, and two out of three multitasked with music. Habit was the strongest motivation for multitasking that positively predicted multitasking frequency. Overall, multitasking with Facebook, texting/IM, and music differed by motivations. Multitasking with music was associated with entertainment and efficiency needs, while multitasking with Facebook/texting/IM was related to satisfying socialization, passing time, and escaping needs.

Keywords

college students multitasking Facebook texting and instant messaging (IM)music

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albarran

A. B.

Anderson

Bejar

L. G.

Bussart

A. L.

Daggett

Gibson

. . .Way

(2007). “What happened to our audience?” Radio and new technology uses and gratifications among young adult users. Journal of Radio Studies, 14, 92-101.

Armstrong

G. B.

Boriarsky

G. A.

Mares

(1991). Background television and reading performance. Communication Monographs, 58, 235-253.

Armstrong

G. B.

Chung

(2000). Background television and reading memory in context: Assessing TV interference and facilitative context effects on encoding versus retrieval processes. Communication Research, 27, 327-352.

Armstrong

G. B.

Sopory

(1997). Effects of background television on phonological and visuo-spatial working memory. Communication Research, 24, 459-480.

Bardhi

Rohm

A. J.

Sultan

(2010). Tuning in and tuning out: Media multitasking among young consumers. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 9, 316-332.

Bowman

L. L.

Levine

L. E.

Waite

B. M.

Gendron

(2010). Can students really multitask? An experimental study of instant messaging while reading. Computers & Education, 54, 927-931.

Carrier

L. M.

Cheever

N. A.

Rosen

L. D.

Benitez

Chang

(2009). Multitasking across generations: Multitasking choices and difficulty ratings in three generations of Americans. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 483-489.

Charney

Greenberg

B. S.

(2001). Uses and gratifications of the Internet. In Lin

Atkin

(Eds.), Communication, technology and society: New media adoption and uses. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 379-407.

Deloitte . (2014). Back-to-school 2014: Rising the head of the class. Deloitte.com . Retrieved from http://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/us/Images/Misc/Infographics/us-retail-b2s-b2c-surveys-2014-infographic.pdf

10.

Duggan

(2015). Mobile messaging and social media 2015. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/19/mobile-messaging-and-social-media-2015/

11.

Ellison

N. B.

Steinfield

Lampe

(2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143-1168.

12.

Evans

J. R.

Mathur

(2005). The value of online surveys. Internet Research, 15, 195-219.

13.

Flanagin

A. J.

(2005). IM online: Instant messaging use among college students. Communication Research Reports, 22, 175-187.

14.

Foehr

U. G.

(2006). Media multitasking among American youth: Prevalence, predictors and pairings. Menlo Park, CA: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.

15.

Furnham

Bradley

(1997). Music while you work: The differential distraction of background music on the cognitive test performance of introverts and extraverts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 445-455.

16.

Furnham

Gunter

Peterson

(1994). Television distraction and the performance of introverts and extroverts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 705-711.

17.

Hanson

T. L.

Drumheller

Mallard

McKee

Schlegel

(2010). Cell phones, text messaging, and Facebook: Competing time demands of today’s college students. College Teaching, 59, 23-30.

18.

Hrastinski

(2006). Introducing an informal synchronous medium in a distance learning course: How is participation affected? The Internet and Higher Education, 9, 117-131.

19.

Jeong

S. J.

Fishbein

(2007). Predictors of multitasking with media: Media factors and audience factors. Media Psychology, 10, 364-384.

20.

Jones

Madden

(2002). The Internet goes to college: How students are living in the future with today’s technology. Collingdale, PA: Diane Publishing.

21.

Junco

Cotten

S. R.

(2011). Perceived academic effects of instant messaging use. Computers & Education, 56, 370-378.

22.

Katz

(1959). Mass communications research and the study of popular culture: An editorial note on a possible future for this journal. Studies in Public Communication, 2, 1-6.

23.

Katz

Blumler

J. G.

Gurevitch

(1973). Uses and gratifications research. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 37, 509-523.

24.

Kononova

Chiang

Y. H.

(2015). Why do we multitask with media? Predictors of media multitasking among Internet users in the United States and Taiwan. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 31-41.

25.

Kononova

Zasorina

Diveeva

Kokoeva

Chelokyan

(2014). Multitasking goes global: Multitasking with traditional and new electronic media and attention to media messages among college students in Kuwait, Russia, and the USA. International Communication Gazette, 76, 617-640.

26.

Lenhart

Madden

(2007). Teens, privacy & online social networks: How teens manage their online identities and personal information in the age of MySpace. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2007/04/18/teens-privacy-and-online-social-networks/

27.

Levine

L. E.

Waite

B. M.

Bowman

L. L.

(2007). Electronic media use, reading, and academic distractibility in college youth. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, 560-566.

28.

Mokhtari

Delello

Reichard

(2015). Connected yet distracted: Multitasking among college students. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 45, 164-180.

29.

Mokhtari

Reichard

C. A.

Gardner

(2009). The impact of Internet and television use on the reading habits and practices of college students. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52, 609-619.

30.

Oldham

G. R.

Cummings

Mischel

L. J.

Schmidtke

J. M.

Zhou

(1995). Listen while you work? Quasi-experimental relations between personal-stereo headset use and employee work responses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 547-564.

31.

Papacharissi

Mendeson

(2011). Toward a new(er) sociability: Uses, gratifications and social capital on Facebook. In Papathanassopoulos

(Ed.), Media perspectives for the 21st century. London, England: Routledge, 212-230.

32.

Papacharissi

Rubin

A. M.

(2000). Predictors of Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44, 175-196.

33.

Park

Kee

K. F.

Valenzuela

(2009). Being immersed in social networking environment: Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12, 729-733.

34.

Pempek

T. A.

Yermolayeva

Y. A.

Calvert

S. L.

(2009). College students social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 227-238.

35.

Pool

M. M.

Koolstra

C. M.

van der Voort

T. H.

(2003). The impact of background radio and television on high school students’ homework performance. Journal of Communication, 53, 74-87.

36.

Quan-Haase

(2007). University students’ local and distant social ties: Using and integrating modes of communication on campus. Information, Communication & Society, 10, 671-693.

37.

Quan-Haase

Young

A. L.

(2010). Uses and gratifications of social media: A comparison of Facebook and instant messaging. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30, 350-361.

38.

Roberts

D. F.

Foehr

U. G.

Rideout

V. J.

(2005). Generation M: Media in the lives of 8-18 year-olds. Menlo Park, CA: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.

39.

Rogers

R. D.

Monsell

(1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.

40.

Rosen

L. D.

Carrier

L. M.

Cheever

N. A.

(2013). Facebook and texting made me do it: Media-induced task-switching while studying. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 948-958.

41.

Ruggiero

T. E.

(2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication and Society, 3, 3-37.

42.

Schellenberg

E. G.

(2001). Music and nonmusical abilities. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 930, 355-371.

43.

Schellenberg

E. G.

(2005). Music and cognitive abilities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 317-320.

44.

Shao

(2008). Understanding the appeal of user-generated media: A uses and gratifications perspective. Internet Research, 19, 7-25.

45.

Sheldon

(2008). Facebook favorite: Facebook and motives for its use. Southwestern Journal of Mass Communication, 23(3), 39-53.

46.

Shirky

(2014). Why I just asked my students to put their laptops away. Medium.com . Retrieved from https://medium.com/@cshirky/why-i-just-asked-my-students-to-put-their-laptops-away-7f5f7c50f368

47.

Stafford

T. F.

Stafford

M. R.

Schkade

L. L.

(2004). Determining uses and gratifications for the Internet. Decision Sciences, 35, 259-288.

48.

Tomatis

(1991). Pourquoi Mozart? [Why Mozart?], Paris, France: Ergo Press.

49.

Urista

M. A.

Dong

Day

K. D.

(2009). Explaining why young adults use MySpace and Facebook through uses and gratifications theory. Human Communication, 12, 215-229.

50.

Viner

(2014, February). Social media statistics: How college students are using social networking. Study Breaks Magazine. Retrieved from http://studybreakscollegemedia.com/2014/social-media-statistics-how-college-students-are-using-social-networking/#sthash.MwAC8mNx.dpuf

51.

Wang

Tchernev

J. M.

(2012). The “myth” of media multitasking: Reciprocal dynamics of media multitasking, personal needs, and gratifications. Journal of Communication, 62, 493-513.

52.

Wiley

Sisson

(2006, November). Ethics, accuracy and assumption: The use of Facebook by students and employers. Southwestern Ohio Council for Higher Education Special Topics Forum, Dayton.

53.

Wright

K. B.

(2005). Researching Internet-based populations: Advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3). doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00259.x

54.

Zhang

Jeong

S. H.

Fishbein

(2010). Situational factors competing for attention: The interaction effect of multitasking and sexually explicit content on TV recognition. Journal of Media Psychology, 22, 2-13.