This study examines the impact of Child Protective Services (CPS) reports made by research study staff on participant retention and discusses human subjects protocols that may minimize either the need to make such reports or the negative impact of reporting on participants and on participant retention. Among 1, 354 primary caregiver-child pairs in the Longitudinal Studies of Child Abuse and Neglect (LONGSCAN) studies, a total of 15 were reported to CPS by study staff. Within this group, rates of study-generated reports and study participation subsequent to having been reported by researchers were examined. There was an overall retention rate of 93% across a minimum of three interview waves in this sample. Reporting research participants to CPS may have little impact on attrition.
Amaya-Jackson, L., Socolar, R. S., Hunter, W. H., Runyan, D. K., & Colindres, R. (2000). Directly questioning children and adolescents about maltreatment: A review of survey measures used. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 710-724.
2.
Barnett, D., Manly, J. T., & Cicchetti, D. (1993). Defining child maltreatment: The interface between policy and research. In D. Cicchetti & S. L. Toth (Eds.), Advances in applied developmental psychology: Child abuse, child development and social policy (pp. 7-73). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
3.
Fisher, C. B. (1993). Integrating science and ethics in research with high-risk children and youth.SRCD Social Policy Report, 7(4), 1-27.
4.
Fisher, C. B., Higgins-D'Alessandro, A., Rau, J.-M. B., Kuther, T. L., & Belanger, S. (1996). Referring and reporting research participants at risk: Views from urban adolescents.Child Development, 67, 2086-2100.
5.
Foreman, T., & Bernet, W. (2000). A misunderstanding regarding the duty to report suspected abuse.Child Maltreatment, 5, 190-196.
6.
Hunter, W. M., Cox, C. E., Teagle, S., Johnson, R. M., Mathew, R., Knight, E. D., et al. (2003a).Measures for assessment of functioning and outcomes in longitudinal research on child abuse. Volume 1: Early childhood. Available at the LONGSCAN Web site: /www.iprc.unc.edu/longscan/
7.
Hunter, W. M., Cox, C. E., Teagle, S., Johnson, R. M., Mathew, R., Knight, E. D., et al. (2003b).Measures for assessment of functioning and outcomes in longitudinal research on child abuse. Volume 2: Middle childhood. Available at the LONGSCAN Web site: www.iprc.unc.edu/longscan/.
8.
Kinard, E. M. (1985). Ethical issues in research with abused children.Child Abuse and Neglect, 9, 301-311.
9.
King, N. M. P., & Churchill, L. R. (2000). Ethical principles guiding research on child and adolescent subjects.Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 710-724.
10.
Knight, E. D., Runyan, D. K., Dubowitz, H., Brandford, C., Kotch, J. B., Litrownik, A. J., et al. (2000). Methodological and ethical challenges associated with child self-report of maltreatment: Solutions implemented by the LONGSCAN Consortium.Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 760-775.
11.
Kotch, J. B. (2000). Ethical issues in longitudinal child maltreatment research.Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 696-709.
12.
Melton, G. B. (1990). Certificates of confidentiality under the Public Health Service Act: Strong protection but not enough.Violence and Victims, 5, 67-71.
13.
National Research Council (NRC). (1993). Ethical and legal issues in child maltreatment research. In Understanding child abuse & neglect (pp. 324-342). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
14.
Putnam, F. W., Liss, M. B., & Landsverk, J. (1996). Ethical issues in maltreatment research with children and adolescents. In K. Hoagwood, P. S. Jensen, & C. Fisher (Eds.), Ethical issues in mental health research with children (pp. 113-132). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
Runyan, D. K. (2000). Introduction: The ethical, legal, and methodological implications of directly asking children about abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 675-681.
16.
Runyan, D. K., Curtis, P. A., Hunter, W. M., Black, M. M., Kotch, J. B., Bangdiwala, S., et al. (1998). LONGSCAN: A consortium for longitudinal studies of maltreatment and the life course of children.Aggression and Violent Behavior, 3, 235-245.
17.
Sedlack, A. J. (1986).Second National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS-2). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
18.
Sieber, J. E. (1994). Issues presented by mandatory reporting requirements to researchers of child abuse and neglect.Ethics and Behavior, 4, 1-22.
19.
Steinberg, A. H., Pynoos, R. S., Goenjian, A. K., Sossanabadi, H., & Sherr, L. (1999). Are researchers bound by child abuse reporting laws?Child Abuse and Neglect, 23, 771-777.
20.
Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intra-family conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics Scales.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75-88.
21.
Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Finkelhor, D., Moore, D. W., & Runyan, D. K. (1998). Identification of child maltreatment with the Parent Child Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS-PC): Development and psychometric data for a national sample of adolescent parents. Child Abuse and Neglect, 22(4), 249-270.
22.
Taube, D. O., & Elwork, A. (1990). Researching the effects of confidentiality laws on patients' self-disclosures.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 21(1), 72-75.
