This article offers national estimates of the proportions of hospital inpatient cases and cost for adult, nonmaternal patients who have multiple chronic conditions. The authors employ a refined classification of chronic versus acute conditions, collapsed to no more than one condition per distinct category of condition. The number of different chronic conditions provides a simple measure of complexity, differing from measures of severity of illness that pertain to a particular episode of treatment. A multivariate regression finds that the number of chronic conditions is an independent influence on hospital cost per case, controlling for other key determinants. Patients with complex illness (e.g., 3+ or 5+ chronic conditions) have a disproportionately large effect on hospital cost per year. The identification of patients in the hospital with complex illness can help in targeting new covered services in a health plan or in risk adjusting health plan premiums. Current policies and demonstrations for the Medicare program may not be sufficient to address complex illness.
Anderson, G. A., and J. Horvath.2002. Chronic conditions: Making the case for ongoing care. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
2.
Averill, R., N. Goldfield, B. Steinbeck, T. Grant, J. Muldoon, A. J. Frough, and J. Gray.2000. Development of the all patient refined DRGs (APR-DRGs). 3M HIS Research Report, 8-97. Available from 3M, Inc., along with software documentation and data. Also available from data suppliers such as the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
3.
Berenson, R., and J. Horvath.2003. Confronting the barriers to chronic care management. Health Affairs Web exclusive edition (3): 37-53.
4.
Burwell, B., W. Crown, and J. Drabek. 1997. Children with severe chronic conditions on Medicaid. Report prepared under contract, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE), Office of Disability, Aging, and Long-Term Care Policy. Report available at http://aspe.hhs.gov/daltcp/reports/children.htm.
5.
Chen, A., R. Brown, M. Archibald, S. Aliotta, and P. Fox. 2000. Best practices in coordinated care. Final report to the Health Care Financing Administration under Contract 500-95-0048, available from Mathematica Policy Research, Princeton, NJ.
6.
Elixhauser, A., C. Steiner, R. Harris, and R. M. Coffey.1998. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Medical Care36:8-27.
7.
Friedman, B., and J. Basu.2004. The rate and cost of hospital readmissions for preventable conditions. Medical Care Research and Review, 61 (2): 225-240.
8.
Fries, J., E. Koop, J. Sokolov, C. E. Beadle, and D. Wright.1998. Beyond health promotion: Reducing need and demand for medical care; health care reforms to improve health while reducing costs. Health Affairs, 17 (2): 70-84.
9.
Gillespie, J., and R. Mollica. 2003. Coordinating care for the chronically ill: How do we get there from here? Report for the National Academy for State Health Policy, February 14, 2003. Available from Partnership for Solutions, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
10.
Gold, M., T. Lake, W. E. Black, and M. Smith.2005. Challenges in improving care for high-risk seniors in Medicare. Health Affairs—Web ExclusiveW5 (April 26): 199-211.
11.
Hwang, W., W. Heller, H. Ireys, and G. Anderson.2001. Out-of-pocket medical spending for care of chronic conditions. Health Affairs20 (6): 267-278.
12.
Iezzoni, L., ed. 2003. Risk adjustment for measuring health care outcomes. 3rd ed.Chicago: Health Administration Press.
13.
Institute of Medicine, Committee on Quality of Health Care in America.2001. Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
14.
Jiang, H. J., D. Stryer, B. Friedman, and R. Andrews.2003. Multiple hospitalizations for patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care26 (5): 1421-1426.
15.
Lorig, K. R., D. S. Sobel, A. L. Stewart, B. W. Brown, A. Bandura, P. Ritter, V. M. Gonzalez, D. D. Laurent, and H. R. Holman.1999. Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization: A randomized trial. Medical Care37 (1): 5-14.
16.
McGlynn, E., S. Asch, J. K. Adams, J. Hicks, A. DeCristofaro, and E. A. Kerr.2003. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine348 (26): 2635-2645.
17.
Newhouse, J.1996. Reimbursing health plans and health providers: Efficiency in production versus selection. Journal of Economic Literature34:1236-1263.
18.
Ozminkowski, R. J., M. W. Smith, R. M. Coffey, T. L. Mark, C. A. Neslusan, and J. Drabek. 2000. Private payers serving individuals with disabilities and chronic conditions. Report prepared under contract HHS-100-95-0044, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Disability, Aging and Long-Term Care Policy.
19.
Perrin, E. C., P. Newacheck, I. B. Pless, D. Drotar, S. L. Gortmaker, J. Leventhal, J. M. Perrin, R. E. Stein, D. K. Walker, and M. Weitzman.1993. Issues involved in the definition and classification of chronic health conditions. Pediatrics91 (4): 787-793.
20.
Romano, P. S., and B. K. Chan.2000. Risk-adjusting acute myocardial infarction mortality: Are APR-DRGs the right tool?Health Services Research34 (7): 1469-1489.
21.
Sloan, F.2000. Not-for-profit ownership and hospital behavior. In Handbook of health economics, chap. 21, edited by A. Culyer and J. Newhouse. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
22.
Wagner, E., B. Austin, C. Davis, M. Hindmarsh, J. Schaefer, and A. Bonomi.2001. Improving chronic illness care: Translating evidence into action. Health Affairs20 (6): 64-78.
23.
Zuckerman, S., J. Hadley, and L. Iezzoni.1994. Measuring hospital efficiency with frontier cost functions. Journal of Health Economics13:255-280.
