This article evaluates the impact of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services/Premier pay-for-performance demonstration project on performance improvement in three clinical areas in a multihospital health care system. The study compares a group of hospitals participating in this project against a control group of similar hospitals that did not participate. Although the incentives are extremely small, the findings show that participation in the pay-for-performance initiative had a significant impact on the rate and magnitude of performance improvement. The project led to marked improvement in the quality of clinical process delivery and accelerated the adoption of evidence-based practices.
Alexander, S. 2004. The Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration Project. Paper presented at Premier annual breakthroughs conference and exhibition, May 11-14, 2004, Las Vegas, NV.
2.
Alexander, S. 2005. The business case for quality: Pay-for-performance. Paper presented at the 7th annual National Patient Safety Foundation Patient Safety Congress, May 4-6, Orlando, FL.
3.
Berwick, D. M., N. A. DeParle, D. M. Eddy, P. M. Ellwood, A. C. Enthoven, G. C. Halvorson, K. W. Kizer, et al. 2003. Paying for performance: Medicare should lead. Health Affairs22 (6): 8-10.
4.
CMS Office of Media Affairs. 2005. Medicare pay-for-performance demonstration shows significant quality of care improvement at participating hospitals. Washington, DC. http://www.premierinc.com/advocacy/issues/medicare/05/demo-quality-improvement-pr-0505.pdf (accessed July 28, 2005).
5.
CMS Public Affairs. 2003. HHS to launch Medicare demonstration to promote high quality care in hospitals. Washington, DC. http://www.hhs.gov/news (accessed July 22, 2004).
6.
Freking, K.2005. The Washington Post, March 2. http://tricare.osd.mil/eenews/downloads/030305TheWashingtonPost.doc (accessed October 3, 2005).
7.
Institute of Medicine. 2001. Crossing the quality chasm: Anew health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
8.
Jencks, S. F., E. D. Huff, and T. Cuerdon. 2003. Change in the quality of care delivered to Medicare beneficiaries, 1998-1999 to 2000-2001. Journal of the American Medical Association289 (3): 305-312.
9.
Kuhn, H.2005. Testimony of Herb Kuhn, Director Center for Medicare Management in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services before the Senate Committee on Finance on Improving the Qualty in Medicare: The role of value-based purchasing, July 27, Washington, DC.
10.
The Leapfrog Group for Patient Safety. 2005. Incentive and reward compendium. http://ir.leapfroggroup.org/compendium/ (accessed August 13, 2005).
11.
Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. 2003. Report to the Congress: Variation and innovation in Medicare. Washington, DC: Author.
12.
The National Quality Forum. 2003. A comprehensive framework for hospital care performance evaluation. Washington, DC: Author.
Premier, Inc.2005a. Groundbreaking pay-for-performance project reports quality of care improvement at participating hospitals. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services: Results offer promising evidence for the future of pay-for-performance. Charlotte, NC: Author. http://www.premierinc.com/all/newsroom/press-releases/05-may/pay-for-performance.jsp (accessed July 28, 2005).
15.
Premier, Inc.2005b. New research supports Medicare pay-for-performance. Early returns from groundbreaking pilot project show economic incentives can drive quality improvement. Charlote, NC: Author. http://www.premierinc.com/all/newsroom/press-releases/05-jul/research-supports-p4p.jsp (accessed July 28, 2005).
16.
Premier, Inc.2005c. Senate finance chairman will seek to advance Medicare pay-for-performance legislation in the fall; at hearing on potential of P4P to improve care, Premier submits statement on early success, fifth-quarter data of hospital quality demo. Washinton, DC: Author. http://www.premierinc.com/all/advocacy/issues/medicare/05/p4p-leg-likely-0705.jsp (accessed July 28, 2005).
17.
Premier, Inc.2005d. Statement for the Hearing Record. U.S. Senate Committee on Finance “Improving quality in Medicare: The role of value-based purchasing,” July 27. Washington, DC: Author.
18.
Rhode Island Department of Health. 2003. Hospital performance in Rhode Island; how often our hospitals provide recommended care for heart attack, heart failure and pneumonia. Technical report. Providence, RI: Author.
19.
Rosenthal, M. B., R. Fernandopulle, H. R. Song, and B. Landon. 2004. Paying for quality: Providers’ incentives for quality improvement. Health Affairs23 (2): 127-141.
20.
Scinto, J., J. Courtney, H. M. Krumholz, M. J. Radford, J. M. Foody, B. R. Turnbull, D. Galusha, et al. 2002. Final report: Hospital core performance measurement project, April 2002. Middletown, CT: Qualidigm.
21.
Shortell, S. M.2004. Increasing value: A research agenda for addressing the managerial and organizational challenges facing health care delivery in the United States. Medical Care Research and Review61 (3, Suppl.): 12S-30S.
22.
Young, G. J., B. White, J. F. Burgess, D. Berlowitz, M. Meterko, M. R. Guldin, and B. G. Bokhour. 2005. Conceptual issues in the design and implementation of pay-for-quality programs. American Journal of Medical Quality20 (3): 144-150.
