Nonlinear Energy Sinks (NES) have gained significant attention in vibration control due to their lightweight design and broader frequency bandwidth compared to linear Dynamic Vibration Absorbers (DVAs). However, their performance is sensitive to the excitation amplitude of the primary system, limiting their practical use. To address this, this study proposes an Active NES (A-NES) based on a voice coil actuator (VCA). The A-NES replicates the nonlinear restoring force of a passive NES through programmed control of the VCA, while also allowing dynamic adjustments to its parameters to adapt to changing amplitude conditions. Numerical simulations and experiments are conducted to compare the vibration suppression efficiency of the A-NES with the conventional passive NES under various excitation frequencies and amplitudes. The results show that the A-NES achieves similar vibration suppression efficiency curves and amplitude-dependent trends as the passive NES, with a maximum efficiency of 96%, confirming their functional equivalence. Additionally, experiments on parameter adjustment show that modifying the cubic nonlinear stiffness coefficient significantly expands the high-efficiency suppression range and improves robustness against amplitude variations. Unlike conventional mechanical adjustment methods, the proposed A-NES eliminates the need for complex mechanisms and allows real-time parameter tuning based on the vibration state of the primary system, enhancing its practical applicability.
Al-ShudeifatMA (2015) Asymmetric magnet-based nonlinear energy sink. Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics10(1): 014502. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4027462
2.
AmoozgarMRCastrichiniAGarveySD, et al. (2024) The effect of a nonlinear energy sink on the gust response of a wing. Aerospace Science and Technology145: 108904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2024.108904
3.
AraujoGPDa SilvaJAIMarquesFD (2025) Energy harvesting and passive suppression from flutter via rotary nonlinear energy sink. Journal of Sound and Vibration603: 118953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2025.118953
4.
Fadel MiguelLFBeckAT (2024) Optimal path shape of friction-based track-nonlinear energy sinks to minimize lifecycle costs of buildings subjected to ground accelerations. Reliability Engineering & System Safety248: 110172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110172
5.
GattiG (2022) An adjustable device to adaptively realise diverse nonlinear force-displacement characteristics. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing180: 109379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109379
6.
GendelmanOVManevitchLIVakakisAF, et al. (2001) Energy pumping in nonlinear mechanical oscillators: part I—dynamics of the underlying hamiltonian systems. Journal of Applied Mechanics68(1): 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1345524
7.
LiTQiuDSeguyS, et al. (2017) Activation characteristic of a vibro-impact energy sink and its application to chatter control in turning. Journal of Sound and Vibration405: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2017.05.033
LiuELiMDingH (2025) Influence of additional mass and connection of nonlinear energy sinks on vibration suppression performance. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing224: 112123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.112123
10.
LuZWangZZhouY, et al. (2018) Nonlinear dissipative devices in structural vibration control: a review. Journal of Sound and Vibration423(1): 18–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2018.02.052
11.
LiuYYuDZhaoH, et al. (2007) Review of passive dynamic vibration absorbers. Journal of Mechanical Engineering3: 14–22.
12.
LuHHabibGWuX, et al. (2024) Application of nonlinear energy sink in suppressing wheel shimmy for advanced vehicle chassis design under independent wheel subsystems. Nonlinear Dynamics112(17): 14907–14923. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-024-09726-1
13.
MaitySSanthoshBBalaramB, et al. (2025) Suppression of vortex-induced vibrations using bistable nonlinear energy sink. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation150: 108952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2025.108952
14.
MesnyLBaguetSAlcortaR, et al. (2026) Hybrid nonlinear energy sink, a tunable device for vibration mitigation: theorical and experimental demonstration. Journal of Sound and Vibration625: 119577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2025.119577
15.
PaknejadAZhaoGYChesnéS, et al. (2021) Hybrid electromagnetic shunt damper for vibration control. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics143(2): 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4048389
16.
PennisiGStephanCGourcE, et al. (2017) Experimental investigation and analytical description of a vibro-impact NES coupled to a single-degree-of-freedom linear oscillator harmonically forced. Nonlinear Dynamics88(3): 1769–1784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-017-3344-1
RomeoFManevitchLIBergmanLA, et al. (2015) Transient and chaotic low-energy transfers in a system with bistable nonlinearity. Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)25(5): 053109. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4921193
19.
RoncenTMichonGManetV (2023) Design and experimental analysis of a pneumatic nonlinear energy sink. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing190: 110088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.110088
20.
RosaFGPierpaoloBStefanoL (2024) Dynamics analysis of a nonlinear energy sink for passive suppression of a parametrically excited system. Meccanica59(5): 703–715.
21.
TorresPAHassanAKaczmarczykS, et al. (2018) Energy efficient active vibration control strategies using electromagnetic linear actuators. Journal of Physics: Conference Series1048(1): 012011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1048/1/012011
22.
VakakisAF (2001) Inducing passive nonlinear energy sinks in vibrating systems. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics123(3): 324–332. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1368883
23.
WallIPAmoozgarMRPopovAA (2024) Aeroelasticity of an aircraft wing with nonlinear energy sink. Aerospace Science and Technology155(2): 109684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2024.109684
24.
WangJZhengYMaY, et al. (2024) Experimental study on asymmetric and bistable nonlinear energy sinks enabled by side tracks. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing206: 110874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110874
25.
WangJZhengYMaY (2025) Movable-track nonlinear energy sinks with customizable restoring forces. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing224: 112078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.112078
26.
WeidemannTBergmanLAVakakisAF, et al. (2025) Energy transfer and localization in a forced cyclic chain of oscillators with vibro-impact nonlinear energy sinks. Nonlinear Dynamics113(12): 14319–14360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-025-10928-4
27.
ZengYDingHJiJ, et al. (2023) A tristable nonlinear energy sink to suppress strong excitation vibration. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing202: 110694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110694
28.
ZengYDingHJiJ, et al. (2024) Theoretical and experimental study of a stable state adjustable nonlinear energy sink. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing216: 111470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.111470
29.
ZhangSZhouJDingH, et al. (2025) Theoretical investigation on vibration suppression in a system with fractional nonlinear energy sinks. Nonlinear Dynamics113(8): 7937–7959. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-024-10557-3
30.
ZhongRChenJGeW, et al. (2020) Vibration absorption efficiency and higher branches elimination of variable-stiffness nonlinear energy sink. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology27(01): 76–84.
