This paper proposes an asymmetric acceleration S-curve (AAS-curve) and its planning method to minimize the residual vibration caused by the light-damping resonance peak for both stepping and scanning motions. Conventional S-curves including the symmetric S-curve (SS-curve) and the asymmetric velocity S-curve (AVS-curve) with zero-damping zeros can realize zero residual vibration in theory for the zero-damping resonance peak but fail for the light-damping resonance peak. The superiority of the AAS-curve in compensating for the light-damping resonance peak is achieved by its non-isosceles trapezoidal acceleration profile and the resultant light-damping zero. The AAS-curve is also different from the AVS-curve since it can reduce the residual vibration for not only the positioning phase but also the constant-velocity phase. Compared to the combined use of the Zero Vibration and Derivative shaper with the SS-curve (ZVD-SS-curve), the AAS-curve is able to achieve similar specific-frequency and high-frequency suppression abilities with less time consumption by properly designing the parameters. Simulation and experimental results on a two-mass motion system illustrate the effectiveness and superiorities of the AAS-curve. The proposed method is applicable to light-damping systems that require both time efficiency and residual vibration suppression during the constant-velocity and positioning phases.
AbadyIMAmerTSGadHM, et al. (2022) The asymptotic analysis and stability of 3DOF non-linear damped rigid body pendulum near resonance. Ain Shams Engineering Journal13(2): 101554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.07.008.
2.
Al-RawashdehYMAl-TamimiMHeertjesM, et al. (2021a) Micro-positioning end-stage for precise multi-axis motion control in optical lithography machines: preliminary results. In: 2021 American Control Conference (ACC), New Orleans, USA, 25–28 May 2021, pp. 40–47. IEEE.
3.
Al-RawashdehYMAl JanaidehMHeertjesM (2021b) On step-and-scan trajectories used in wafer scanners in semiconductor manufacturing. In: 2021 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), Prague, Czech Republic, 27 September–01 October 2021, pp. 7580–7586. IEEE.
4.
Al-RawashdehYMAl JanaidehMHeertjesMF (2022) Kinodynamic generation of wafer scanners trajectories used in semiconductor manufacturing. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering20(1): 718–732. https://doi.org/10.1109/tase.2022.3196318.
5.
Al-RawashdehYMAl JanaidehMHeertjesMF (2023) A suppress-excite approach for online trajectory generation of uncertain motion systems. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing186: 109769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109769.
6.
AlghanimKAAlhazzaKAMasoudZN (2015) Discrete-time command profile for simultaneous travel and hoist maneuvers of overhead cranes. Journal of Sound and Vibration345: 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2015.01.042.
7.
AltintasYEsfahaniMAKarimiB, et al. (2025) Cascaded FIR and half-sine filter-based smooth trajectory generation algorithm. CIRP Annals74(1): 559–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2025.04.088.
8.
AmerTSStarostaRElameerAS, et al. (2021) Analyzing the stability for the motion of an unstretched double pendulum near resonance. Applied Sciences11(20): 9520. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11209520.
9.
AmerTSStarostaRAlmahalawyA, et al. (2022) The stability analysis of a vibrating auto-parametric dynamical system near resonance. Applied Sciences12(3): 1737. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12031737.
10.
AmerTSAlanazyAElneklawyAH, et al. (2025a) Asymptotic solutions for the 3D motion of asymmetric charged gyrostatic satellite using Poincaré small parameter technique. Aerospace Science and Technology168: 110764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2025.110764
11.
AmerTSElneklawyAHEl-KaflyHF (2025b) Dynamical motion of a spacecraft containing a slug and influenced by a gyrostatic moment and constant torques. Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control44(3): 1708–1725. https://doi.org/10.1177/14613484251322235.
12.
AmerTSEl-KaflyHFElneklawyAH, et al. (2025c) Stability analysis of a rotating rigid body: the role of external and gyroscopic torques with energy dissipation. Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control44(3): 1502–1515. https://doi.org/10.1177/14613484251324586.
13.
BaiYChenXSunH, et al. (2018) Time-optimal freeform S-curve profile under positioning error and robustness constraints. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics23(4): 1993–2003. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmech.2018.2835830.
BiagiottiLMelchiorriC (2020) Optimization of generalized S-curve trajectories for residual vibration suppression and compliance with kinematic bounds. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics26(5): 2724–2734. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmech.2020.3045504.
16.
BiagiottiLMelchiorriCMorielloL (2016) Optimal trajectories for vibration reduction based on exponential filters. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology24(2): 609–622.
17.
ChenHMuHZhuY (2016) Real-time generation of trapezoidal velocity profile for minimum energy consumption and zero residual vibration in servomotor systems. In: 2016 American Control Conference (ACC), Boston, USA, 06–08 July 2016, pp. 2223–2228. IEEE.
18.
CicekETürkerTAkbatiO, et al. (2022) Asymmetric S-Curve generation and tracking under motion constraints: an experimental validation. In: 2022 advances in science and engineering technology international conferences (ASET), Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 21–24 February 2022, pp. 1–6. IEEE.
19.
DongYWanYSongS, et al. (2023) Lithographic stepping trajectory planning for residual vibration suppression: an asymmetric S-curve method. In: 2023 international workshop on advanced patterning solutions (IWAPS), Lishui, China, 26–27 October 2023, pp. 1–5. IEEE.
20.
ElneklawyAHAmerTSAlanazyA, et al. (2025a) Nonlinear dynamical behavior of a three-degree-of-freedom asymmetric rigid body under gyroscopic torque. Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/14613484251385065
21.
ElneklawyAHAmerTSElkilanySA, et al. (2025b) Damping-based attitude control of a gyrostatic satellite in resistive media. Journal of Applied and Computational Mechanicse19528. Available at: https://doi.org/10.22055/jacm.2025.48699.5434
22.
FangYHuJLiuW, et al. (2019) Smooth and time-optimal S-curve trajectory planning for automated robots and machines. Mechanism and Machine Theory137: 127–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2019.03.019.
23.
GuoZZhangJZhangP (2023) Research on the residual vibration suppression of delta robots based on the dual-modal input shaping method. Actuators12(2): 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/act12020084.
24.
HaCWLeeD (2017) Analysis of embedded prefilters in motion profiles. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics65(2): 1481–1489. https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2017.2726959.
25.
HaCWLeeD (2024) Optimal placement of inherent zeros in polynomial-based motion profiles for minimizing residual vibration and travel time under system uncertainties. ISA Transactions152: 467–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2024.06.013.
26.
HaCWRewKHKimKS (2008) A complete solution to asymmetric S-curve motion profile: theory & experiments. In: 2008 international conference on control, automation and systems, Seoul, Korea (South), 14–17 October 2008, pp. 2845–2849. IEEE.
27.
HaCWRewKHKimKS (2013) Robust zero placement for motion control of lightly damped systems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics60(9): 3857–3864. https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2012.2206334.
28.
HanCJSongKRRimUR (2024) An asymmetric S-curve trajectory planning based on an improved jerk profile. Robotica42(7): 2184–2208. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0263574724000031.
29.
KondoDSatoRShiraseK (2022) Positioning command design method for shorter distance positioning operations based on analyzed residual vibration amplitude. Precision Engineering74: 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2021.11.001.
30.
LiJDengH (2018) Vibration suppression of rotating long flexible mechanical arms based on harmonic input signals. Journal of Sound and Vibration436: 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2018.07.034.
31.
LiWPLuoBHuangH (2016) Active vibration control of flexible joint manipulator using input shaping and adaptive parameter auto disturbance rejection controller. Journal of Sound and Vibration363: 97–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2015.11.002.
32.
LiXGaoXXiaoJ, et al. (2023) Time-optimal general asymmetric S-curve profile with low residual vibration. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing188: 109978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109978.
33.
LiuYDongYTanJ (2018) Online-offline optimized motion profile for high-dynamic positioning of ultraprecision dual stage. Complexity2018(1): 4948368. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4948368.
34.
LiuTCuiJLiY, et al. (2023) Time-optimal asymmetric S-curve trajectory planning of redundant manipulators under kinematic constraints. Sensors23(6): 3074. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23063074.
35.
MercyTJacquodNHerzogR, et al. (2018) Spline-based trajectory generation for CNC machines. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics66(8): 6098–6107. https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2018.2874617.
36.
RewKHHaCWKimKS (2009) A practically efficient method for motion control based on asymmetric velocity profile. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture49(7–8): 678–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2009.01.008.
37.
SatoRShiraseK (2021) Analytical time constant design for jerk-limited acceleration profiles to minimize residual vibration after positioning operation in NC machine tools. Precision Engineering71: 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2021.02.009.
38.
WangXXunGTanS, et al. (2023) Time-varying LQ terminal control for compliant morphing structure using acceleration-based objective function. Journal of Sound and Vibration549: 117561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2023.117561.
39.
YangYWeiYLouJ, et al. (2017) Nonlinear dynamic analysis and optimal trajectory planning of a high-speed macro-micro manipulator. Journal of Sound and Vibration405: 112–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2017.05.047.
40.
YuDYDingZTianXQ (2022) Incomplete smooth S-curve acceleration and deceleration feedrate planning modeling and analysis. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology120: 7171–7185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09236-7.
41.
ZhouXZhengXZhengH, et al. (2026) A hybrid vibration suppression method based on PID control and input shaping in minimally invasive surgical robots. Measurement258: 119295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2025.119295.
