To study the dynamic response and the time-varying damage law of irregular and complex connected structures on the eastern annex of Xi’an Railway Station under earthquake actions, a finite element model (FEM) of the connected structure was established using SAP2000 software. The force law and damage mechanism of the upper structure under uneven settlement of the foundation were discussed, and the influence of earthquake action on development process of structural plastic hinges, internal forces of key components, inter-story shear force and inter-story displacement angle was analyzed. The research results show that uneven settlement of the foundation can increase the internal forces and damage degree of key components, and the small triangular area produces more plastic hinges, exhibiting obvious translational-torsional coupling effects. In addition, during the elastic-plastic loading stage, the maximum inter-story displacement angle of the connected structure is less than the maximum limit value specified, and the inter-story shear force in the small triangle area is more significantly affected by uneven settlement of the foundation. Due to the ability of sliding supports to release the relative displacement of connected structures, they can effectively alleviate the adverse effects of uneven settlement of supports on the seismic performance of connected structures.
AkyürekOSuksawangNGoTH (2019) Vibration control for torsionally irregular buildings by integrated control system. Engineering Structures201: 109775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109775
3.
AmrGYoung-JooLDo-SooM (2023) Seismic vulnerability of reinforced concrete frame structures: obtaining plan or vertical mass irregularity from structure use change. Journal of Structural Engineering150(3): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-12440
4.
BhosaleASDavisRSarkarP (2018) Seismic safety of vertically irregular buildings: performance of existing indicators. Journal of Architectural Engineering24(3): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000319
5.
BirrellMAstrozaRCarreñoR, et al. (2021) Bayesian parameter and joint probability distribution estimation for a hysteretic constitutive model of reinforcing steel. Structural Safety90: 102062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2020.102062
6.
DBJ61/T 182-2021 (2021) Specification for site investigation and engineering design on Xi’an ground fractures. Xi’an: Shaanxi Provincial Department of Housing and Urban Rural Development.
7.
El-DakhakhniWAshourA (2017) Seismic response of reinforced-concrete masonry shear-wall components and systems: state of the art. Journal of Structural Engineering143(9): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001840
8.
FajfarP (2012) A practical nonlinear method for seismic performance evaluation. Advanced Technology in Structural Engineering or Advanced Structural Engineering91: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1061/40492(2000)125
9.
GB 50010-2015 (2015) Code for Design of Concrete Structures. China Architecture & Building Press.
10.
GB 50011-2016 (2016) Code for Seismic Design of Buildings. China Architecture & Building Press.
11.
GB 50017-2017 (2017) Standard for Design of Steel Structures. China Architecture & Building Press.
12.
GuoWGuoLLZhaiZP, et al. (2022a) Seismic performance assessment of a super high-rise twin-tower structure connected with rotational friction negative stiffness damper and lead rubber bearing. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering152: 107039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.107039
13.
GuoHCZhangBMLiXL, et al. (2022b) Shaking table test on complex connected structure of east annex building of Xi'an railway station. Journal of Building Structures43(6): 155–164. https://doi.org/10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2020.0579
14.
IvanovMLChowWK (2023) Structural damage observed in reinforced concrete buildings in adiyaman during the 2023 Turkiye Kahramanmaras earthquakes. Structures28: 105578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105578
15.
JGJ/T 101-2015 (2015) Specification for Seismic Test of Buildings. China Architecture & Building Press.
16.
LiWTWangRZhangJM (2023) Influence of aboveground structure on connected underground structure seismic response within an integrated system. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology134: 105003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2023.105003
17.
LuXLChenLZZhouY, et al. (2009) Shaking table model tests on a complex high-rise building with two towers of different height connected by trusses. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings18: 765–788. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.460
18.
MaSLJiangSFWuC, et al. (2020) Identification of sudden stiffness change in the acceleration response of a nonlinear hysteretic structure. Shock Vibrat20: 3824216–3824220. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3824216
19.
MahmoudSAbdallahWHannaN, et al. (2016) Seismic response evaluation of connected super-tall structures. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Structures and Buildings169(11): 840–852. https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.15.00085
20.
MiceliEFerraraSCastaldoP (2024) Confinement effects within the seismic design of reinforced concrete frames: reliability assessment and comparison. Engineering Structures313: 118248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118248
21.
NishimuraAYamamotoHKimuraY, et al. (2011) Base-isolated super high-rise RC building composed of three connected towers with vibration control systems. Structural Concrete12: 94–108. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201100011
22.
PanYZhaoCJChangZW, et al. (2019) Shaking table test of connected structure with large-span special-shaped steel corridor. China Civil Engineering Journal52(2): 66–77. https://doi.org/10.15951/j.tmgcxb.2019.02.007
23.
PengFSLiJLLiuDW, et al. (2023) Seismic response analysis of connected dual-tower isolated structure under three-dimensional earthquakes. Ain Shams Engineering Journal14: 102538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2023.102538
24.
PoudelNChaulagainH (2024) Numerical investigation of nonlinear soil-structure interaction effects on response of irregular RC buildings. Results in Engineering22: 102161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102161
25.
PranabKDSekharCDTusharKD (2020) Seismic behavior of plan and vertically irregular structures: state of art and future challenges. Natural Hazards Review22(2): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000440
26.
WeiHHZhangBMTangYQ, et al. (2024) Seismic performance investigation of irregular and complex connected structures based on the influence of ground fissure activity. Journal of Building Engineering91: 109661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109661
27.
ZhangRJGuoTLiAQ (2024a) Experimental investigation into demountable dry connections for fully precast frame structures through shaking table tests. Thin-Walled Structures201: 112014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2024.112014
28.
ZhangXYWangYLLiuM, et al. (2024b) Nonlinear dynamical modeling and response analysis of complex structures based on assumed mode weighting. Engineering Structures312: 118226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118226
29.
ZhaoZPTangYCHongN, et al. (2024) Interaction-performance-driven design of negative-stiffness friction pendulum systems for aboveground structure-connected underground structure-soil system with ground motion effects. Journal of Building Engineering88: 108970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.108970
30.
ZhouYLuXLLuWS, et al. (2009) Shake table testing of a multi-tower connected hybrid structure. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration8: 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-009-8099-3
31.
ZhouYLuXLLuWS, et al. (2011) Study on the seismic performance of a multi-tower connected structure. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings20(3): 387–401. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.533
