Compared with conventional linear isolators, quasi-zero stiffness (QZS) isolators offer superior load-bearing capacity and low-frequency vibration isolation performance. This study proposes a QZS isolator based on a continuous structure, in which negative stiffness is achieved through the second-order antisymmetric buckling behavior of inclined beams in an X-shaped structure, while a folded beam serves as the positive stiffness component to realize QZS characteristics. The static behavior of the proposed QZS isolator, formed by combining the negative and positive stiffness components, is thoroughly investigated via numerical simulations and experimental tests. Particular attention is given to the influence of the geometric parameters of the X-shaped structure. A nonlinear single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) model incorporating quadratic and cubic stiffness terms is established, and the harmonic balance method (HBM) is employed to calculate the transmissibility and assess the isolation performance. Results demonstrate that the QZS isolator can effectively reduce both the resonance frequency and the onset frequency of isolation. Nonlinear phenomena such as stiffness softening and harmonic resonance are also examined, revealing that increased excitation amplitude and reduced damping ratio intensify the system’s nonlinearity.
BaiJYeTJinG, et al. (2025) Theoretical and experimental investigation of a two-stage X-structure vibration isolation system with inerter coupling for marine equipment. Ocean Engineering323: 120351.
2.
BianJJingX (2020) Analysis and design of a novel and compact X-structured vibration isolation mount (X-Mount) with wider quasi-zero-stiffness range. Nonlinear Dynamics101(4): 2195–2222.
3.
BrinkmeyerASanterMPirreraA, et al. (2012) Pseudo-bistable self-actuated domes for morphing applications. International Journal of Solids and Structures49(9): 1077–1087.
4.
CaiCZhouJWuL, et al. (2020) Design and numerical validation of quasi-zero-stiffness metamaterials for very low-frequency band gaps. Composite Structures236: 111862.
5.
CarrellaABrennanMJWatersTP (2007) Static analysis of a passive vibration isolator with quasi-zero-stiffness characteristic. Journal of Sound and Vibration301: 678–689.
6.
ChaiZSongXZangJ, et al. (2023) Nonlinear vibration isolation of spacecraft system by a bionic variable-stiffness device enhanced by electromagnetic component. Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica36(6): 921–932.
7.
ChaiYBianJLiM (2024) A novel quasi-zero-stiffness isolation platform via tunable positive and negative stiffness compensation mechanism. Nonlinear Dynamics112(1): 101–123.
8.
ChangYZhouJWangK, et al. (2021) A quasi-zero-stiffness dynamic vibration absorber. Journal of Sound and Vibration494: 115859.
9.
ChangYZhouJWangK, et al. (2022) Theoretical and experimental investigations on semi-active quasi-zero-stiffness dynamic vibration absorber. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences214: 106892.
10.
ChenDZiHLiY, et al. (2021) Low frequency ship vibration isolation using the band gap concept of sandwich plate-type elastic metastructures. Ocean Engineering235: 109460.
11.
ChongXWuZLiF (2022) Vibration isolation properties of the nonlinear X-combined structure with a high-static and low-dynamic stiffness: theory and experiment. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing179: 109352.
12.
DetrouxTRensonLMassetL, et al. (2015) The harmonic balance method for bifurcation analysis of large-scale nonlinear mechanical systems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering296: 18–38.
13.
DuPLiuYChenW, et al. (2021) Fast and precise control for the vibration amplitude of an ultrasonic transducer based on fuzzy PID control. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control68: 2766–2774.
14.
FanHYangLTianY, et al. (2020) Design of metastructures with quasi-zero dynamic stiffness for vibration isolation. Composite Structures243: 112244.
15.
GuHJiHZhangS, et al. (2023) Displacement sensing with quasi-zero stiffness structure and flexoelectricity. Smart Materials and Structures32(3): 035024.
HanHSorokinVTangL, et al. (2022) Lightweight origami isolators with deployable mechanism and quasi-zero-stiffness property. Aerospace Science and Technology121: 107319.
18.
HongHKimWKimW, et al. (2024) Machine learning-driven design optimization of buckling-induced quasi-zero stiffness metastructures for low-frequency vibration isolation. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces16(14): 17965–17972.
19.
HuXZhouC (2022) The effect of various damping on the isolation performance of quasi-zero-stiffness system. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing171: 108944.
20.
IbrahimRA (2008) Recent advances in nonlinear passive vibration isolators. Journal of Sound and Vibration314: 371–452.
21.
KimHTawfickSHKingWP (2022) Modeling and design of zero‐stiffness elastomer springs using machine learning. Advanced Intelligent Systems4(12): 2200225.
22.
KovacicIBrennanMJWatersTP (2008) A study of a nonlinear vibration isolator with a quasi-zero stiffness characteristic. Journal of Sound and Vibration315(3): 700–711.
23.
LiMChengWXieR (2021) A quasi-zero-stiffness vibration isolator using a cam mechanism with user-defined profile. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences189: 105938.
24.
LianXDengHHanG, et al. (2023) A low-frequency micro-vibration absorber based on a designable quasi-zero stiffness beam. Aerospace Science and Technology132: 108044.
25.
LinRHouLChenY, et al. (2023) A novel adaptive harmonic balance method with an asymptotic harmonic selection. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics44(11): 1887–1910.
26.
LiuCTangJYuK, et al. (2020a) On the characteristics of a quasi-zero-stiffness vibration isolator with viscoelastic damper. Applied Mathematical Modelling88: 367–381.
27.
LiuECFangXWenJH, et al. (2020b) 1/2 sub-harmonic resonance in bistable structure and its effect on vibration isolation characteristics. Acta Physica Sinica69(6): 064301.
28.
LiuSPengGJinK (2021) Design and characteristics of a novel QZS vibration isolation system with origami-inspired corrector. Nonlinear Dynamics106(1): 255–277.
29.
LiuXChenSWangB, et al. (2024) A compact quasi-zero-stiffness mechanical metamaterial based on truncated conical shells. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences277: 109390.
30.
LiuXChenSWangB, et al. (2025) A mechanical metamaterial with real-time tunable bandgap based on pneumatic actuation. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences289: 110045.
31.
MengQHouLWangA, et al. (2025a) Subharmonic response suppression of a quasi-zero stiffness system. Journal of Sound and Vibration594: 118674.
32.
MengQHouLLinR, et al. (2025b) On a quasi-zero stiffness vibration isolator with multiple zero stiffness points for mass load deviation. Applied Mathematical Modelling145: 116112.
33.
MiaoYZhengJ (2020) Optimization design of compliant constant-force mechanism for apple picking actuator. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture170: 105232.
34.
QiuJLangJHSlocumAH (2004) A curved-beam bistable mechanism. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems13(2): 137–146.
35.
SaeedNAEllabbanYYHouL, et al. (2024) Nonlinear interactions of an n-layer X-shape low-frequency vibration isolator equipped with a nonlinear vibration absorber at 1:1 internal resonance: analytical and numerical investigations. Physica Scripta99(10): 105207.
36.
SaeedNAEllabbanYYHouL, et al. (2025a) Nonlinear vibration of quasi-zero stiffness structure with piezoelectric harvester and RL-load: intra-well and inter-well oscillation modes under 1:1 internal resonance. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics46(8): 1451–1474.
37.
SaeedNAEllabbanYYHouL, et al. (2025b) Geometric nonlinear dynamics of a quasi-zero stiffness isolator integrated with an energy harvester: monostable, perfect zero-linear stiffness, and bistable oscillation modes. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals199: 116633.
38.
SaeedNAEllabbanYYHouL, et al. (2025c) Nonlinear dynamics of a bio-inspired 2-DOF low-frequency X-shaped vibration isolator with m-to-n layers driven harmonically under simultaneous primary and 1:1 internal resonances. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals190: 115786.
39.
ShanSKangSHRaneyJR, et al. (2015) Multistable architected materials for trapping elastic strain energy. Advanced Materials27(29): 4296–4301.
40.
WangPXuQ (2018) Design and modeling of constant-force mechanisms: a survey. Mechanism and Machine Theory119: 1–21.
41.
XiaoLSunXChengL, et al. (2024) A 3D-printed quasi-zero-stiffness isolator for low-frequency vibration isolation: modelling and experiments. Journal of Sound and Vibration577: 118308.
42.
YeKJiJCBrownT (2020) Design of a quasi-zero stiffness isolation system for supporting different loads. Journal of Sound and Vibration471: 115198.
43.
ZhangYZangYLiM, et al. (2017) Active-passive integrated vibration control for control moment gyros and its application to satellites. Journal of Sound and Vibration394: 1–14.
44.
ZhangQYanPWangH (2022) A curved-beam based quasi-constant force mechanism supporting large range and force-sensitive robotic manipulation. Mechanism and Machine Theory172: 104799.
45.
ZhaoXWangZZhengG (2022) Policy optimization for vibration isolator stiffness control during agile attitude maneuvers. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing165: 108279.
46.
ZhaoJZhouGZhangD, et al. (2023) Integrated design of a lightweight metastructure for broadband vibration isolation. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences244: 108069.
