This study presents an optimization methodology for nonlinear energy sinks (NES) aimed at attenuating longitudinal vibration in marine propulsion systems. A cubic-stiffness NES model integrated with propulsion dynamics was validated through the harmonic balance and Runge-Kutta methods. An enhanced Harris Hawks Optimization (HHO) algorithm simultaneously minimizes force transmission and maximizes energy dissipation. The optimized NES effectively reduces vibrations across multiple resonances. Sensitivity analysis identifies the mass ratio as the dominant parameter, while nonlinear stiffness plays a key role in balancing the two objectives. These findings establish practical design guidelines for NES in marine propulsion, demonstrating that effective vibration suppression can be achieved with minimal added mass.
AlaboolHMAlarabiatDAbualigahL, et al. (2021) Harris hawks optimization: a comprehensive review of recent variants and applications. Neural Computing & Applications33(15): 8939–8980.
2.
CarltonJ (2012) Marine Propellers and Propulsion. 2nd edition. Butterworth-Heinemann.
3.
ChenYWangLHuaHX (2017) Longitudinal vibration of marine propeller-shafting system induced by inflow turbulence. Journal of Fluids and Structures68: 264–278.
4.
ChenHYMaoXYDingH, et al. (2020) Elimination of multimode resonances of composite plate by inertial nonlinear energy sinks. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing135: 106383.
5.
ChenYYangXDLiangF (2025) Nonlinear flutter suppression of marine risers exposed to internal and external annular flows by nonlinear energy sink. Applied Mathematical Modelling148: 116272.
6.
CillisASarrouyEMatteiPO, et al. (2019) Investigation on the use of a passive nonlinear absorber for the reduction of vibration in the mast of a floating offshore wind turbine. INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings, Institute of Noise Control Engineering259(6): 3857–3868.
7.
CostaSNJHassmannCHGBalthazarJM, et al. (2009) On energy transfer between vibrating systems under linear and nonlinear interactions. Nonlinear Dynamics57: 57–67.
8.
DaiWShiBYangJ, et al. (2023) Enhanced suppression of longitudinal vibration transmission in propulsion shaft system using nonlinear tuned mass damper inerter. Journal of Vibration and Control29(11–12): 2528–2538.
9.
DantasMJHBalthazarJM (2008) On energy transfer between linear and nonlinear oscillators. Journal of Sound and Vibration315: 1047–1070.
10.
ForestieroA (2017) Bio-inspired algorithm for outliers detection. Multimedia Tools and Applications76(24): 25659–25677.
11.
GendelmanOVGorlovDManevitchL, et al. (2005) Dynamics of coupled linear and essentially nonlinear oscillators with substantially different masses. Journal of Sound and Vibration286(1–2): 1–19.
12.
GendelmanOVStarosvetskyYFeldmanM (2008) Attractors of harmonically forced linear oscillator with attached nonlinear energy sink I: description of response regimes. Nonlinear Dynamics51: 31–46.
13.
GengXFDingHWeiKX, et al. (2020) Suppression of multiple modal resonances of a cantilever beam by an impact damper. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics41(3): 383–400.
14.
Georgiadis VakakisAFMcFarlandDMBergmanLF, et al. (2005) Shock isolation through passive energy pumping caused by nonsmooth nonlinearities. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos15: 1989–2001.
15.
HuangXSuZZhangZ, et al. (2018) Vibration transmission suppression for propeller-shaft system by hub-embedded damping ring under broadband propeller force. Nonlinear Dynamics91(4): 2651–2666.
16.
JiangXMcFarlandDMBergmanLA, et al. (2003) Steady-state passive nonlinear energy pumping in coupled oscillators: theoretical and experimental results. Nonlinear Dynamics33: 87–102.
KhandujaNBhushanB (2021) Recent advances and application of metaheuristic algorithms: a survey (2014–2020). In: MalikHIqbalAJoshiP, et al. (eds) Metaheuristic and Evolutionary Computation: Algorithms and Applications. Studies in Computational Intelligence. Springer, pp. 207–228.
19.
LiuGLuKZouD, et al. (2017) Development of a semi-active dynamic vibration absorber for longitudinal vibration of propulsion shaft system based on magnetorheological elastomer. Smart Materials and Structures26(7): 075009.
20.
LiuNLiCYinC, et al. (2018) Application of a dynamic antiresonant vibration isolator to minimize the vibration transmission in underwater vehicles. Journal of Vibration and Control24(17): 3819–3829.
21.
LiuZWWuKDingQ, et al. (2020) Engine misfire diagnosis based on the torsional vibration of the flexible coupling in a diesel generator set: simulation and experiment. Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies8: 163–178.
22.
LiuLYuYChenY (2024) Wind-vortex-induced vibrations of a deepwater jacket pipe and vibration suppression using a nonlinear energy sink. Journal of Ocean University of China23(3): 633–642.
23.
LuYChenHHeY, et al. (2025) Shaking table test and simulation study on CS-NES vibration control of offshore wind turbine. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering197: 109548.
24.
MaKLiuYWangX, et al. (2024) A comparative study on the torsional vibration suppression of rotor system using variable steady state nonlinear energy sink. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals185: 115144.
25.
MalatkarPNayfehAH (2008) Authors’ response to the rebuttal by A.F. Vakakis and L.A. Bergman of “Steady state dynamics of a linear structure weakly coupled to an essentially nonlinear oscillator,” Vol. 47, 2007, pp. 167–179. Nonlinear Dynamics53: 169–171.
26.
MerzSKessissoglouNKinnsR, et al. (2010) Minimisation of the sound power radiated by a submarine through optimisation of its resonance changer. Journal of Sound and Vibration329(8): 980–993.
27.
MichaloliakosAWongWYDaviesR, et al. (2025) Stabilizing dynamic subsea power cables using bi-stable nonlinear energy sinks. Ocean Engineering334: 121613.
28.
SharmaSKKumarNAveshM, et al. (2024) Navigating tranquillity with H∞ controller to mitigate ship propeller shaft vibration. Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies12: 1–11.
29.
SongMHNamTKLeeJU (2020) Self-excited torsional vibration in the flexible coupling of a marine propulsion shafting system employing Cardan shafts. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering8: 348.
30.
StarosvetskyYGendelmanOV (2008) Attractors of harmonically forced linear oscillator with attached nonlinear energy sink. II: optimization of a nonlinear vibration absorber. Nonlinear Dynamics51: 47–57.
31.
StewartGLacknerM (2013) Offshore wind turbine load reduction employing optimal passive tuned mass damping systems. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology21(4): 1090–1104.
32.
TaghipourJDardelM (2015) Steady state dynamics and robustness of a harmonically excited essentially nonlinear oscillator coupled with a two-DOF nonlinear energy sink. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing62: 164–182.
33.
TamuraYKawadaTSasazawaY (1997) Effect of ship noise on sleep. Journal of Sound and Vibration205(4): 417–425.
34.
VakakisAFGendelmanOVBergmanLA, et al. (2001) Nonlinear Targeted Energy Transfer in Mechanical and Structural Systems. Springer.
35.
ViguieRKerschenG (2009) Nonlinear vibration absorber coupled to a nonlinear primary system: a tuning methodology. Journal of Sound and Vibration326: 780–793.
36.
WangHLDingH (2023) Research on nonlinear energy sink vibration reduction of floating raft system. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Nonlinear Dynamics, Vibration and Control. Springer Nature Singapore.
37.
WangHLWangXDingH (2024a) Low frequency multimode vibration suppression of floating raft system based on NES cells. Marine Structures96: 103629.
38.
WangHLWangXDingH, et al. (2024b) Experimental, theoretical and optimization studies on multimode vibration reduction of floating raft system based on NES cells. Ocean Engineering311: 118897.
YangKZhangYWDingH, et al. (2017) The transmissibility of nonlinear energy sink based on nonlinear output frequency-response functions. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation44: 1–526.
41.
ZengWQiaoHGuoC, et al. (2025a) Inerter-based nonlinear energy sink for enhanced vibration reduction in floating wind turbines: parameter optimization and numerical validation. Ocean Engineering319: 120273.
42.
ZengWGuoCRenWX, et al. (2025b) Nonlinear energy sink for vibration reduction in offshore wind turbines under rotating blade-wind-wave loads: parameter selection and test verification. Renewable Energy251: 123435.
43.
ZhangSYTanGDengY, et al. (2024) Vibration mitigation of spar-buoy floating wind turbines using a nonlinear energy sink. Ocean Engineering304: 117883.
44.
ZhangSYTanGDengY, et al. (2025) Vibration suppression of spar-buoy floating wind turbines using a nonlinear stiffness combined inerter-based absorber. Ocean Engineering329: 121146.
45.
ZhaoLChangZZhengZ (2023) The vibration mitigation of jacket offshore platform based on inerter nonlinear energy sink. Ocean Engineering280: 114943.
46.
ZhengZChangZZhaoL (2023) Mitigating deepwater jacket offshore platform vibration under wave and earthquake loadings utilizing nonlinear energy sinks. Ocean Engineering283: 115096.
47.
ZhengZChangZZhaoL (2024) Mitigating jacket offshore platform vibration under wave loadings utilising nonlinear energy sinks. Ships and Offshore Structures19(9): 1323–1331.
48.
ZouDChenLQWangY, et al. (2016a) Coupled longitudinal–transverse dynamics of a marine propulsion shafting under primary and internal resonances. Journal of Sound and Vibration372: 299–316.
49.
ZouDChenLQWangY, et al. (2016b) Forced vibrations of a marine propulsion shafting with geometrical nonlinearity (primary and internal resonances). Mechanism and Machine Theory105: 304–319.
50.
ZouDLvFTaN, et al. (2020) Study on bearing force of marine propeller induced by longitudinal vibration of propulsion-shafting. Ships and Offshore Structures15(2): 162–173.
51.
ZuoHZhangJYuanGK, et al. (2022) Wind- and sea wave-induced response mitigations of offshore wind turbines using track nonlinear energy sinks. Structural Control and Health Monitoring e2990, in press. DOI: 10.1002/stc.2990.
