With the development of aerospace technology, more and more scientific activities are carried out in the universe. Due to the microgravity environment of space, the control of the 6-DOF platform is different from those on the earth. First, a virtual prototype model of the 6-DOF non-contact platform was built in ADAMS. The dynamics model was developed based on the Newton–Euler method. Then, the 6-DOF backstepping sliding mode controller and disturbance observer were designed in MATLAB/Simulink. Finally, by combining the virtual prototype model in ADAMS and the control system in MATLAB, the co-simulation model was proposed. According to the simulation results, the 6-DOF backstepping sliding mode controller can well complete the positioning, 3D trajectory tracking, and vibration isolation tasks of non-contact 6-DOF platform. Quantitatively, the spatial error of backstepping sliding mode controller’s 3D trajectory tracking is only 50% of the ordinary sliding mode control and it is 20% of the nonlinear propotional-derivative-integral.
AcarMAYilmazC (2013) Design of an adaptive–passive dynamic vibration absorber composed of a string–mass system equipped with negative stiffness tension adjusting mechanism. Journal of Sound & Vibration332(2): 231–245.
2.
ArshidEKhorshidvandAR (2018) Free vibration analysis of saturated porous FG circular plates integrated with piezoelectric actuators via differential quadrature method. Thin-Walled Structures125: 220–233.
3.
DanhLTAhnKK (2014) Active pneumatic vibration isolation system using negative stiffness structures for a vehicle seat. Journal of Sound and Vibration333(5): 1245–1268.
4.
DingZZhaoFLangY, et al. (2019) Anti-disturbance neural-sliding mode control for inertially stabilized platform with actuator saturation. IEEE Access7: 92220–92231.
5.
GongZDingLYueH, et al. (2019) System integration and control design of a maglev platform for space vibration isolation. Journal of Vibration and Control25(11): 1720–1736.
6.
HaghighiDAMobayenS (2018) Design of an adaptive super-twisting decoupled terminal sliding mode control scheme for a class of fourth-order systems. ISA Transactions75: 216–225.
7.
HansenCSnyderSQiuX, et al. (2012) Active Control of Noise and Vibration. London: CRC press.
8.
KongYHuangH (2018) Vibration isolation and dual-stage actuation pointing system for space precision payloads. Acta Astronautica143: 183–192.
9.
LiJLWangJBHeW (2019a) Electromechanical co-simulation analysis for contactless positioning and vibration isolation platform. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science)53(1): 146–157.
10.
LiMZhangYWangY, et al. (2019b) The pointing and vibration isolation integrated control method for optical payload. Journal of Sound and Vibration438: 441–456.
11.
LiJHeW (2019) Modeling and analysis of a biaxial noncontact lorentz force actuator. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics55(4): 1–9.
12.
LiLTanLKongL, et al. (2018) The influence of flywheel micro vibration on space camera and vibration suppression. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing100: 360–370.
13.
LiuCJingXDaleyS, et al. (2015) Recent advances in micro-vibration isolation. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing56: 55–80.
14.
LiuJ (2017) Sliding Mode Control Using MATLAB. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Academic Press.
15.
LuoQLiDJiangJ (2016) Analysis and optimization of microvibration isolation for multiple flywheel systems of spacecraft. Aiaa Journal54(5): 1719–1731.
16.
MobayenS (2016) Design of LMI‐based sliding mode controller with an exponential policy for a class of underactuated systems. Complexity21(5): 117–124.
17.
QiNZhangWGaoJ, et al. (2011) The primary discussion for the ground simulation system of spatial microgravity. Aerospace Control29(3): 95–100.
18.
WangCChenYZhangZ (2018) Simulation and experiment on the performance of a passive/active micro-vibration isolator. Journal of Vibration and Control24(3): 453–465.
19.
WangCXieXChenY, et al. (2016) Investigation on active vibration isolation of a Stewart platform with piezoelectric actuators. Journal of Sound and Vibration383: 1–19.
20.
WangMHuYSunY, et al. (2020) An adjustable low-frequency vibration isolation stewart platform based on electromagnetic negative stiffness. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences181: 105714.
21.
WuQYueHLiuR, et al. (2014a) Parametric design and multiobjective optimization of maglev actuators for active vibration isolation system. Advances in Mechanical Engineering6: 215358.
22.
WuQYueHLiuR, et al. (2014b) Simulation of multi-closed loop control with feed forward control of micro-vibration isolation platform. In: ASME 2014 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, V04AT04A006-V004AT004A006, Montreal, QC, Canada, 14–20 November 2014.
23.
YangFZhaoYMuX, et al. (2020) A Novel 2-DOF Lorentz force actuator for the modular magnetic suspension platform. Sensors20(16): 4365.
24.
YingWYuKJianJ, et al. (2015) Dynamic modeling and robust nonlinear control of a six-DOF active micro-vibration isolation manipulator with parameter uncertainties. Mechanism Machine Theory92: 407–435.
25.
YuYChenSWangY (2017) Cascade active disturbance rejection optimal control for microgravity active vibration isolation system. In: 2017 32nd Youth Academic Annual Conference of Chinese Association of Automation (YAC), Hefei, China, 19–21 May 2017 IEEE, pp. 602–607.
26.
YunYWangLZhangB, et al. (2017) Design, experiments and multidisciplinary optimization of 2 degrees-of-freedom electromagnetic actuator for application in space vibration isolation. Advances in Mechanical Engineering9(12): 1687814017745675.
27.
ZhangXZhaoYGuoK, et al. (2017a) An adaptive B-spline neural network and its application in terminal sliding mode control for a mobile satcom antenna inertially stabilized platform. Sensors17(5): 978.
28.
ZhangYkDongWbLiuW, et al. (2017b) Verification of the microgravity active vibration isolation system based on parabolic flight. Microgravity Science Technology29(6): 415–426.
