This paper describes an adaptive system for controlling the tonal vibration of a single-degree-of-freedom system with nonlinear damping. The adaptive control system consists of a force actuator in parallel with the suspension, which includes the nonlinear damper, and a velocity sensor mounted on the mass. The adaptation of the controller is done once every period of the excitation. Because the response of the nonlinear system changes with excitation level, conventional adaptive algorithms, with a linear model of the plant, can be slow to converge and may not achieve the desired performance. An on-line observer is used to obtain a describing function model of the plant, which can vary with the excitation level. This allows the adaptive control algorithm to converge more quickly than using a fixed plant model, although care has to be taken to ensure that the dynamics of the observer do not interfere with the dynamics of the adaptive controller.
AkhtarMTAbeMKawamataM (2005) A new structure for feedforward active noise control systems with improved online secondary path modeling. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing13: 1082–1088.
2.
AkhtarMTAbeMKawamataM (2006) A new variable step size LMS algorithm-based method for improved online secondary path modeling in active noise control systems. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing14: 720–726.
3.
AkhtarMTAbeMKawamataM (2008) Online secondary path modeling in multichannel active noise control systems using variable step size. Signal Processing88: 2019–2029.
4.
BohnCCortabarriaAHärtelV (2004) Active control of engine-induced vibrations in automotive vehicles using disturbance observer gain scheduling. Control Engineering Practice12: 1029–1039.
5.
CariniAMalatiniS (2008) Optimal variable step-size NLMS algorithms with auxiliary noise power scheduling for feedforward active noise control. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing16: 1383–1395.
6.
ChenWH (2004) Disturbance observer based control for nonlinear systems. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics9: 706–710.
7.
ConoverWB (1956) Fighting noise with noise. Noise Control2: 78–92.
8.
Costa MH, Bermudez JCM and Bershad NJ (1999) Statistical analysis of the FXLMS algorithm with a nonlinearity in the secondary-path. In: ISCAS ’99: Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, 1999… Volume 163, pp.166–169.
9.
Davis MW (1984) Refinement and evaluation of helicopter real-time self-adaptive active vibration controller algorithms. Washington DC, USA: NASA Contractor Report 3821.
10.
DuttonKThompsonSBarracloughB (1997) The Art of Control Engineering, London, UK: Addison-Wesley.
11.
ElliottSJ (2001) Signal Processing for Active Control, London, UK: Academic Press.
12.
Elliott SJ, Ghandchi Tehrani M and Langley RS (2015) Nonlinear damping and quasi-linear modelling. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society: A (September 2015).
13.
FellowesAWilsonTKembleG (2011) Wing box non-linear structural damping. In: Proceedings of International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics (IFASD), 26–30 June 2011, Paris, France.
14.
GeorgeNVPandaG (2013) Advances in active noise control: A survey, with emphasis on recent nonlinear techniques. Signal Processing93: 363–377.
15.
Ghandchi TehraniMElliottSJ (2014) Extending the dynamic range of an energy harvester using nonlinear damping. Journal of Sound and Vibration333: 623–629.
16.
HammondCE (1983) Wind tunnel results showing rotor vibratory loads reduction using higher harmonic blade pitch. Journal of American Helicopter Society28: 10–15.
17.
IwasakiMShibataTMatsuiN (1999) Disturbance-observer-based nonlinear friction compensation in table drive system. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics4: 3–8.
18.
Jacklin AS (1998) Comparison of five system identification algorithms for rotorcraft higher harmonic control. NASA Report TP-1998-207687, Washington D.C., USA.
19.
Johnson W (1982) Self-Tuning regulators for multicyclic control. NASA Technical Paper 1996, Washington D.C., USA.
20.
KempfCJKobayashiS (1999) Disturbance observer and feedforward design for a high-speed direct-drive positioning table. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology7: 513–526.
21.
KuoSMHsien-TsaiW (2005) Nonlinear adaptive bilinear filters for active noise control systems. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers52: 617–624.
22.
KuoSMMorganDR (1995) Active Noise Control Systems: Algorithms and DSP Implementations, New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
23.
LaalejHLangZQDaleyS (2012) Application of non-linear damping to vibration isolation: an experimental study. Nonlinear Dynamics69: 409–421.
24.
LangZQJingXJBillingsSA (2009) Theoretical study of the effects of nonlinear viscous damping on vibration isolation of SDOF systems. Journal of Sound and Vibration323: 352–365.
Lueg P (1936) Process of silencing sound oscillations. US Patent No. US 2,043,416, filed 08 March 1934, patented 09 June 1936.
27.
Molusis JA (1984) The importance of nonlinearity on the higher harmonic control of helicopter vibration. American Helicopter Society, 39th Annual Forum, St. Louis, MO, Connecticut, USA, pp. 624–647.
28.
PattDLiuLChandrasekarJ (2005) Higher-harmonic-control algorithm for helicopter vibration reduction revisited. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics28: 918–930.
29.
RayleighJWS (1896) The Theory of Sound, New York, NY: Macmillan.
30.
SahibMAKamilRMarhabanMH (2012) Nonlinear FXLMS algorithm for active noise control systems with saturation nonlinearity. IEEJ Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Engineering7: 598–606.
31.
ShahruzSM (2000) Performance enhancement of a class of nonlinear systems by disturbance observers. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics5: 319–323.
32.
ShahruzSM (2009) Active vibration suppression in multi-degree-of-freedom systems by disturbance observers. Journal of Vibration and Control15: 1207–1228.
33.
ShahruzSMCloetCTomizukaM (2002) Suppression of effects of non-linearities in a class of non-linear systems by disturbance observers. Journal of Sound and Vibration249: 405–415.
34.
SicuranzaGLCariniA (2006) Nonlinear multichannel active noise control. In: MarshallSSicuranzaGL (eds) Advances in Nonlinear Signal and Image Processing, New York, NY: Hindawi Publishing Corporation, pp. 169–203.
35.
SicuranzaGLCariniA (2012) On the BIBO stability condition of adaptive recursive FLANN filters with application to nonlinear active noise control. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing20: 234–245.
36.
SuttonTJElliottSJ (1995) Active attenuation of periodic vibration in nonlinear systems using an adaptive harmonic controller. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics117: 355–362.
37.
TaoGKokotovićPV (1996) Adaptive Control of Systems With Actuator and Sensor Nonlinearities, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
38.
TesfayeAHo SeongLTomizukaM (2000) A sensitivity optimization approach to design of a disturbance observer in digital motion control systems. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics5: 32–38.
39.
Tobias OJ and Seara R (2002) Performance comparison of the FXLMS, nonlinear FXLMS and leaky FXLMS algorithms in nonlinear active control applications. 3–6 September, Signal Processing Conference 2002, 11th European, Toulouse, France: IEEE.
40.
WhiteMTTomizukaMSmithC (2000) Improved track following in magnetic disk drives using a disturbance observer. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics5: 3–11.
41.
WidrowBStearnsSD (1985) Adaptive Signal Processing, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
42.
WordenKTomlinsonGR (2010) Nonlinearity in Structural Dynamics: Detection, Identification and Modelling, London, UK: CRC Press.
43.
ZhangLLanHSerW (2003) A robust online secondary path modeling method with auxiliary noise power scheduling strategy and norm constraint manipulation. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing11: 45–53.
44.
ZhangMLanHSerW (2001) Cross-updated active noise control system with online secondary path modeling. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing9: 598–602.
45.
ZhangQ-ZGanW-SZhouY-l (2005) A model predictive algorithm for active control of nonlinear noise processes. Shock and Vibration12: 227–237.
