The aim of this study is to provide an approach to predicting human influence on a compliant mechanical structure using a substructuring technique. Substructuring techniques allow us to obtain detailed information on the vibrational behaviour of an assembly of structures by characterization of each structure separately. In this manuscript, a hand-arm system is coupled with a vibrating structure using a substructuring technique. A lightweight and compliant vibrating beam is used to demonstrate the concept. To demonstrate the feasibility of accurately predicting the hand-arm systems’ influence on the beam, we selected one position and tested it using four push forces. The characteristics of the hand-arm system for each configuration were coupled with the dynamic characteristics of the beam only over a frequency range of [5; 300] Hz. For each of the four configurations, the coupling predicts the influence of the hand on the vibrational behaviour of the beam. Reliable predictions were obtained for the vibrational behaviour of the assembly. The results indicate that the substructuring approach predicted the vibrational behaviour of the hand-arm-beam assembly with less than 3% error.
AdewusiSARakhejaSMarcottePBoileauPE (2008) On the discrepancies in the reported human hand-arm impedance at higher frequencies. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics38: 703–714.
2.
AldienYMarcottePRakhejaSBoileauPE (2005) Mechanical impedance and absorbed power of hand-arm under xh-axis vibration and role of hand forces and posture. Industrial Health43: 495–508.
3.
AldienYMarcottePRakhejaSBoileauPE (2006) Influence of hand-arm posture on biodynamic response of the human hand-arm exposed to zh-axis vibration. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics36: 45–59.
4.
AvitabileP (2003) Twenty Years of Structural Dynamic Modification: A Review. Sound and Vibration37: 14–25.
5.
BesaAJValeroFJSuñerJLCarballeiraJ (2007) Characterization of the mechanical impedance of the human hand arm system: The influence of vibration direction, hand arm posture and muscle tension. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics37: 225–231.
6.
BoileauPERakhejaSYangXStiharuI (1997) Comparison of biodynamic response characteristics of various human body models as applied to seated vehicle drivers. Noise and Vibration Worldwide28: 7–15.
7.
Burström L (1990) Absorption of Vibration Energy in the Human Hand-Arm. PhD Thesis, Lulea University of Technology.
8.
BurströmL (1997) The influence of biodynamic factors on the mechanical impedance of the hand and arm. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health69: 437–446.
9.
CraigRBamptonM (1968) Coupling of Substructures for Dynamic Analysis. AIAA Journal6: 1313–1319.
10.
Daikoku M and Ishikawa F (1990) Mechanical impedance and vibration model of hand – arm system, Proceedings of the Fifth International conference on Hand-Arm Vibration, Kanzawa, Japan.
11.
De KlerkDRixenDJVoormeerenSN (2008) General Framework for Dynamic Substructuring: History, Review, and Classification of Techniques. AIAA Journal46: 1169–1181.
12.
DongRGRakhejaSSchopperAWHanBSmutzWP (2001) Hand-transmitted vibration and biodynamic response of the human hand–arm: a critical review. Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering29: 391–441.
13.
DongRGWelcomeDEMcDowellTWWuJZ (2006) Measurement of biodynamic response of human hand-arm system. Journal of Sound and Vibration294: 807–827.
14.
DongRGWelcomeDEMcDowellTWWuJZ (2008a) Analysis of handle dynamics-induced errors in hand biodynamic measurements. Journal of Sound and Vibration318: 1313–1333.
15.
DongRGWelcomeDEWuJZMcDowellTW (2008b) Development of hand-arm system models for vibrating tool analysis and test rig construction. Noise Control Engineering Journal56: 35–44.
16.
DongRGWelcomeDEXuXSWarrenCMcDowellTWWuJZ (2012) Mechanical impedances distributed at the fingers and palm of the human hand in three orthogonal directions. Journal of Sound and Vibration331: 1191–1206.
17.
DongRGWuJZWelcomeDE (2005) Recent advances in biodynamics of hand-arm system. Industrial Health43: 449–471.
18.
EwinsDJ (2000) Modal Testing: theory, practice and application, 2nd edition. Philadelphia: Research Studies Press.
19.
GriffinMJ (1990) Handbook of Human Vibration, London: Academic Press.
20.
GriffinMJ (1994) Foundations of hand-transmitted vibration standards. Nagoya Journal of Medical Science57(Suppl.): 147–164.
21.
GurramRRakhejaSBrammerAJ (1995) Driving-point mechanical impedance of the human hand-arm system: synthesis and model development. Journal of Sound and Vibration180: 437–458.
22.
HurtyWC (1960) Vibrations of Structural Systems by Component Mode Synthesis. Journal of Engineering Mechanics/American Society of Civil Engineers86: 51–69.
23.
Imregun M and Robb D (1992), Structural Modification via FRF Coupling Using Measured Data. Proceedings of the Tenth International Modal Analysis Conference, Society for Experimental Mechanics, pp. 1095–1099.
24.
International Organization for Standardization 5982 (ISO-5982) (2001) Mechanical vibration and shock – Range of idealized values to characterize seated-body biodynamic response under vertical vibration. International Standard ISO-5982.
25.
International Organization for Standardization 5349 (ISO-5349) (2001) Mechanical vibration – Measurement and evaluation of human exposure to hand-transmitted vibration. International Standard ISO-5349.
26.
International Organization for Standardization 10068 (ISO-10068) (2012) Mechanical vibration and shock, mechanical impedance of the human hand – arm system at the driving point, International Standard ISO-10068.
27.
JahnRHesseM (1986) Applications of hand-arm models in the investigation of the interaction between man and machine. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health12: 343–346.
28.
Jetmundsen B (1986) On frequency domain methodologies for prescribed structural modification and subsystem synthesis. PhD Thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, New York.
29.
JetmundsenBBielawaRFlanellyW (1988) Generalized Frequency Domain Substructure Synthesis. Journal of the American Helicopter Society33: 55–65.
30.
Lewis CH (2000) Evaluating the vibration isolation of soft seats using an active anthropodynamic dummy. Proceedings of 35th UK Group Meeting on Human Responses to Vibration, Southampton, England, pp. 249–259.
31.
MacNealR (1971) Hybrid Method of Component Mode Synthesis. Computers and Structures1(4): 581–601.
32.
MansfieldNJ (2005) Human Response to Vibration, Boca Raton: CRC Press.
33.
Marcotte P, Adewusi S, Boutin J, Nélisse H, Rakheja S and Boileau PE (2007) Modeling the contributions of handle dynamics on the biodynamic response of the human hand-arm system. 11th International Conference on Hand-Arm Vibration, Bologna.
34.
MarcottePAldienYBoileauPERakhejaSBoutinJ (2005) Effect of handle size and hand-handle contact force on the biodynamic response of the hand-arm system under zh–axis vibration. Journal of Sound and Vibration283: 1071–1091.
35.
MarcottePBoutinJJasinskiJ (2010) Development of a hand-arm mechanical analogue for evaluating chipping hammer vibration emission values. Journal of Sound and Vibration329: 1068–1980.
36.
MishoeJWSuggsCW (1977) Hand-arm vibration. Part II. Vibrational responses of the human hand. Journal of Sound and Vibration53: 545–558.
37.
RakhejaSWuJZDongRGSchopperAW (2002) A comparison of biodynamic models of the human hand-arm system for applications to hand-held power tools. Journal of Sound and Vibration249: 55–82.
38.
Reynolds DD and Falkenberg RJ (1982) Three- and four-degrees of freedom models of the vibration response of the human hand. In: Brammer AJ and Taylor W (eds) Vibration Effects on the Hand and Arm in Industry pp. 117–132.
39.
ReynoldsDDFalkenbergRJ (1984) A study of hand vibration on chipping and grinding operators. Part II: four-degree-of-freedom lumped parameter model of the vibration response of the human hand. Journal of Sound and Vibration95: 499–514.
40.
ReynoldsDDSoedelW (1977) Dynamic response of the hand – arm system to a sinusoidal input. Journal of Sound and Vibration21: 339–353.
