This paper concerns quality improvement of modal models estimated by the use of “standard” modal analysis methods. The authors proposed application of the Least Squares Frequency Domain method making use of the Gauss—Newton algorithm to the quality improvement of stabilization diagrams as well as application of the Balanced Realization method to identify and remove spurious poles from stabilization diagrams. Formulated algorithms were implemented in the Matlab environment and verified for data measured on real structures. Created software supports critical stages of modal analysis, which results in quality improvement of estimated modal models and higher credibility of drawn conclusions.
Antoni, J., Garibaldi, L., Marchesiello, S. and Sidhamed M., 2004, “New separation technique for output-only modal analysis,” Shock and Vibration11, 227—242.
2.
Balmès, E., 1996, “Frequency domain identification of structural dynamics using the pole/residue parameterization,” in 14th International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC), Dearborn, MI, February 12—15.
3.
Balmès, E., 1997, Structural Dynamics Toolbox for Use with Matlab, User's Guide, Version 3, Scientific Software Group, Sèvres , France, (www.sdtools.com).
4.
Basseville, M., Benveniste, A., Goursat, M., Hermans, L., Mevel, L. and Van der Auweraer, H., 2001, “Outputonly subspace-based structural identification: from theory to industrial testing Practice,” ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control123, 2—8.
5.
Beauchamp, K.G., 1978, Signal Processing by the Use of Analogue and Digital Methods (in Polish), WNT, Warsaw .
6.
Benveniste, A. and Fuchs, J., 1985, “Single sample modal identification of a nonstationary stochastic process,” IEEE Transactions of Automatic ControlAC-30 (1), 66—74.
7.
Benveniste, A., and Mevel, L., 2005, “Nonstationary consistency of covariance based subspace methods,” www.irisa.fr/distribcom/benveniste/pub .
8.
Brickner, R., Andersen, P. and Moller, N., 2000, “An indicator for separation of structural and harmonic modes in output-only modal testing,” in Proceedings of the International Conference — IMAC 18, San Antonio, TX, February 7—10, pp. 1649—1654.
9.
Chen, Z. and Mechefske, C.K., 2001, “Model order selection: A practical approach ,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing15(2), 265—273.
10.
Cooper, J.E., 2004, “On the use of weighted least squares for time domain modal parameter identification,” Shock and Vibration11, 457—465.
11.
Djuric, P.M., 1994, “Model selection based on asymptotic Bayes theory ,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Seventh SP workshop on SSAP, Quebec, Canada, June 26—29.
12.
Drexel, M.V., Ginsberg, J.H. and Zaki B.R., 2003, “State space implementation of the algorithm of mode isolation,” Journal of Vibration and Acoustics125, 205—213.
13.
Goethals, I. and De Moor, B., 2002, “Model reduction and energy analysis as a tool to detect spurious modes,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering (ISMA) , Leuven, Belgium, September 16—18, pp. 1307—1314.
14.
Gontier, C., 2005, “Energetic classifying of vibration modes in subspace stochastic modal analysis,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing19, 1—19.
15.
Góral, G. and Uhl T., 2002, “Application of classifying neural network to model order selection” (in Polish), in 11 th International Symposium on Structure Dynamics, Rzeszow —Arlamow, September 25—27.
16.
Hannen, E.J. and Quinn, B.G., 1979, “The determination of the order of an autoregression ,” Journal of Royal Statistical Society41, 190—195.
17.
Heylen, W., Lammens, S. and Sas P., 1994, Modal Analysis Theory and Testing, KUL, Leuven.
18.
Iwaniec, J., 2005, Methods of Quality Improvement of Modal Model Parameters Estimation (in Polish), ITE, Radom .
19.
Iwaniec, J., Uhl, T., 2003, “Application of the nonlinear least squares frequency domain method to the estimation of modal model parameters,” Machine Dynamics Problems27(2), 37—54.
20.
Iwaniec, J., Kurowski, P., Lisowski, W., 2004, “Application of balanced realization method to modal model reduction” (in Polish), in Contemporary Issues of Modal Analysis, ITE, Radom.
21.
Mevel, L., Sam, A. and Goursat, M., 2004, “Blind model identification for large aircrafts ,” in Proceedings of 22nd International Modal Analysis Conference IMAC XXII, Dearborn, MI, January 26—29.
22.
Moore, B.C., 1981, “Principal component analysis in linear systems: controllability, observability and model reduction,” IEEE Transactions of Automatic Control, AC-26(1), 17—32.
23.
Norton, J.P., 1986, An Introduction to Identification, Academic Press, London.
24.
Peeters, B. and De Roeck, G., 1999, “Reference-based stochastic subspace identification for output-only modal analysis,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing13(6), 855—878.
25.
Ren, W. and De Roeck, G., 2002, “Structural damage identification using modal data. I: simulation verification,” Journal of Structural Engineering128, 87—95.
26.
Rissanen, J., 1978, “Modeling by the shortest data description ,” Automatica, 14, 465—471.
27.
Scionti, M., Lanslots, J., Goethals, I., Vecchio, A., Van der Auweraer, H., Peeters, B. and De Moor, B., 2003, “Tools to improve detection of structural changes from in-flight flutter data,” in Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Recent Advances in Structural Dynamics (ISVR), Southampton, UK, July 14— 16.
28.
Uhl, T., 1997, Computer Aided Identification of Mechanical Structure Models (in Polish), WNT, Warszawa .
29.
Uhl, T., Lisowski, W., Mendrok, K., Kurowski, P. and Bednarz, J., 2005, R54a Raport: Operational Modal Analysis of the Wanda Bridge in Krakow (in Polish), AGH University ofScience and Technology , Krakow.
30.
Van Overschee, P. and De Moor, B., 1996, Subspace Identification for Linear Systems— Theory—Implementation— Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston/ London/Dordrecht.
31.
Verboven, P., Parloo, E., Guillaume, P. and Van Overmeire, M. , 2002, “Autonomous structural health monitoring. Part I: Modal parameter estimation and tracking,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 16(4) 637— 657.
