CohenL. M. (1996). Mapping the domains of ignorance and knowledge in gifted education. Roeper Review, 18(3), 183–189.
2.
DelisleJ. (1995). First things first. Gifted Child Today, 18(6), 10–11.
3.
DettmerP. (1991). Gifted program advocacy: Overhauling bandwagons to build support. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35(4), 165–171.
4.
GallagherJ. J. (1994). Current and historical thinking on education for gifted and talented students (Report No. 303 217). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED 372 584)
5.
GoreeK. (1996). Accepting the challenge: Making the most out of inclusive settings. Gifted Child Today, 19(2), 22–23, 43
6.
KarnesF. A.MarquardtR. G. (1991). Gifted children and the law: Mediation, due process, and court cases.Dayton, OH: Ohio Psychology Press.
7.
KarnesF. A.RileyT. L. (1991). Public relations strategies for gifted education. Gifted Child Today, 14(6), 35–37.
8.
RenzulliJ. S. (1993). Introduction: Research and you can make a difference. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16(2), 97–102.
9.
RileyT. L.KarnesF. A. (1993). Joining together with other associations: Strategies for cooperation. Roeper Review, 15(4), 250–251.
10.
WebbJ. T.MeckstrothE. A.TolanS. A. (1982). Guiding the gifted child: A practical source for parents and teachers.Columbus, OH: Ohio Psychology Publishing Co.