BenbowC.P. (1988). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability in intellectually talented preadolescents: Their nature, effects, and possible causes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 169–232.
2.
BenbowC.P.StanleyJ.C. (1983). Academic precocity: Aspects of its development. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
3.
CampbellD.T.StanleyJ.C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
4.
FoxL.H.BrodyL.E.TobinD. (Eds.). (1980). Women and the mathematical mystique. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
5.
GeorgeW.C.CohnS.J.StanleyJ.C. (Eds.). (1978). Educating the gifted: Acceleration and enrichment. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
6.
KeatingD.P. (1976). A Piagetian approach to intellectual precocity. In KeatingD.P. (Ed.), Intellectual talent: Research and development (pp. 90–99). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
7.
StanleyJ.C.GeorgeW.C.SolanoC.H. (1977). The gifted and the creative: A fifty-year perspective. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
8.
StanleyJ.C.KeatingD.P.FoxL.H. (Eds.). (1974). Mathematical talent: Discovery, description, and development. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
9.
StanleyJ.C.StanleyB.S.K. (1986). Highschool biology, chemistry, or physics learned well in three weeks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 237–250.