BeckL. (1989). Mentorships: Benefits and effects on career development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33, 23–28.
2.
BenbowC.P. (in press). Meeting the needs of gifted students through use of acceleration. In WangM.C.ReynoldsM.WalbergH. (Eds.), Handbook of Special Education: Research and Practice, Vol. 4. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
3.
BenbowC.P.ArjmandO. (1990). Predictors of high academic achievement in mathematics and science by mathematically talented students: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 430–431.
4.
5.
BrodyL.E.BenbowC.P. (1987). Accelerative strategies: How effective are they for the gifted?Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 105–110.
6.
FeldhusenJ.F. (1989). Synthesis of research on gifted youth. Educational Leadership, 46, 6–11.
7.
HowleyA. (1989). The progress of gifted students in a rural district that emphasized acceleration strategies. Roeper Review, 11, 205–207.
8.
KulikJ.A.KulikC.C. (1984). Effects of accelerated instruction on students. Review of Educational Research, 54, 409–425.
9.
National Council for Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics.Reston, VA: Author.
10.
RobinsonA. (1990). Cooperation or exploitation? The argument against cooperative learning for talented students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 9–27.
11.
SlavinR.E. (1990). Ability grouping, cooperative learning, and the gifted. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 3–8.
12.
SouthernW.T.JonesE.D.FiscusE.D. (1989). Practitioner objections to the academic acceleration of gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33, 29–35.
13.
StanleyJ.C.(in press). A better model for residential high schools for talented youth. Phi Delta Kappan.
14.
SwiatekM.A.BenbowC.P. (1990, November). A ten-year longitudinal follow-up of ability-matched accelerated and unaccelerated gifted students. Paper presented at the annual convention of the National Association of Gifted Children. Little Rock, AR.
15.
SwiatekM.A.BenbowC.P. (1991). A ten-year longitudinal follow-up of participants in a fast-paced mathematics course. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(2), 138–150.
16.
U.S. Department of Education (1986). What works.Washington, DC: Author.
17.
Van Tassel-BaskaJ. (1989). Appropriate curriculum for gifted learners. Educational Leadership, 46, 13–15.