This column reviews research related to acceleration. The author discusses myths about acceleration, truths about the use of acceleration, and strategies for acceleration in classrooms. Policy recommendations are provided for responsible school decision making. Based on 100 years of evidence, the author concludes that acceleration opportunities for gifted students throughout the schooling process is a basic right and a necessity to an appropriate education for them, a key tenet for inclusion in school district mission statements.
BenbowC. P. (1991). Meeting the needs of gifted students through use of acceleration. In WangM. C.ReynoldsM. C.WalbergH. J. (Eds.), Handbook of special education (4, pp. 23–36). Pergamon.
2.
BenbowC. P.StanleyJ. C. (Eds.), (1983a). Academic precocity: Aspects of its development. Johns Hopkins University Press.
3.
BenbowC. P.StanleyJ. C. (1983b). Constructing educational bridges between high school and college. Gifted Child Quarterly, 27(3), 111–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628302700303
4.
BrodyL. E.AssoulineS. G.StanleyJ. C. (1990). Five years of early entrants: Predicting successful achievement in college. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34(3), 138–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629003400402
5.
BrodyL. E.BenbowC. P. (1987). Accelerative strategies: How effective are they for the gifted?Gifted Child Quarterly, 31(3), 105–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628703100302
6.
BrodyL. E.StanleyJ. C. (1991). Young college students: Assessing factors that contribute to success. In SouthernW. T.JonesE. D. (Eds.), Academic acceleration of gifted children (pp. 102–132). Teachers College Press.
7.
CornellD. G.CallahanC. M.LoydB. H. (1991). Personality growth of female early college entrants: A controlled prospective study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35(3), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629103500305
8.
DaurioS. P. (1979). Educational enrichment versus acceleration: A review of the literature. In GeorgeW. C.CohnS. J.StanleyJ. C. (Eds.), Educating the gifted, acceleration and enrichment (pp. 13–53). The Johns Hopkins University Press.
9.
GallagherJ. (1969). Gifted children. In EbelR. L. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of education research (4th ed., pp. 537–544). Macmillan.
10.
GallagherJ. J.GallagherS. A. (1994). Teaching the gifted child (4th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
11.
GrossM. U. M. (1994). Radical acceleration: Responding to academic and social needs of extremely gifted adolescents. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 5(4), 27–34. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ494767
12.
GrossM. U. M. (2004). Exceptionally gifted children. Routledge.
13.
GrossM. U. M.van VlietH. E. (2003). Radical acceleration of highly gifted children: An annotated bibliography of international research on highly gifted children who graduate from high school three or more years early. University of New South Wales.
JanosP. M.RobinsonN. M.LunneborgC. E. (1989). Markedly early entrance to college: A multi-year comparative study of academic performance and psychological adjustment. The Journal of Higher Education, 60(5), 496–518. https://doi.org/10.2307/1982264
16.
JonesE.SouthernT. (1992). Programming, grouping, and acceleration in rural school districts: A survey of attitudes and practices. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(2), 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629203600210
17.
KulikC. C.KulikJ. A. (1992a). Effects of ability grouping on secondary school students: A meta-analysis of evaluation findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19(3), 415–428. https://doi.org/10.2307/1162722
18.
KulikJ. A.KulikC. C. (1984). Synthesis of research on effects of accelerated instruction. Educational Leadership, 42(2), 84–89. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ308281
MarzanoR. (1999). An analysis of national standards in relationship to instructional time. McRel.
21.
National Education Commission on Time and Learning. (1994). Prisoners of time. Government Printing Office.
22.
RenzulliJ. S.SmithL. H.ReisS. M. (1982). Curriculum compacting: An essential strategy for working with gifted students. The Elementary School Journal, 82(3), 185-194. https://doi.org/10.1086/461256
23.
RichardsonT. M.BenbowC. P. (1990). Long-term effects of acceleration on the social-emotional adjustment of mathematically precocious youth. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 464–470. https://doi.org/10.103/0022-0663.82.3.464
24.
RobinsonN. M.JanosP. M. (1986). Psychological adjustment in a college-level program of marked academic acceleration. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 15(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02140783
25.
SchieverS. W.MakerC. J. (1997). Enrichment and acceleration: An overview and new directions. In ColangeloN.DavisG. A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 113–125). Allyn and Bacon.
26.
SouthernT.JonesE. (Eds.), (1991). The academic acceleration of gifted children. Teachers College Press.
27.
StanleyJ. C. (1979). The study and facilitation of talent for mathematics. In PassowA. H. (Ed.), The gifted and talented: Their education and development, 78th yearbook of the national society for the study of education (pp. 169–185). University of Chicago Press.
28.
Steenbergen-HuS.MakelM.Olszewski-KubiliusP. (2016). What one hundred years of research says about the effects of ability grouping and acceleration on K–12 students’ academic achievement: Findings of two second-order meta-analyses. Review of Educational Research, 20(10), 1–52. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316675417
29.
SwiatekM. A.BenbowC. P. (1991). A 10-year longitudinal follow-up of participants in a fast-paced mathematics course. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(2), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.2307/749590
30.
VanTassel-BaskaJ. (2003). Curriculum planning and instructional design for gifted learners. Love Publishing.
31.
VanTassel-BaskaJ.LittleC. (Eds.), (2024). Content-based curriculum for high-ability learners. Prufrock Press.
