This literature review uses a socio-cultural lens to explore how income, race, culture, and parenting practices interact to cause, complicate, and further exacerbate the gap in gifted student identification. The article reframes the aforementioned factors using Annette Lareau’s work on concerted cultivation and natural growth models as a theoretical explanation. The authors recommend the following to address gifted education enrollment inequity: enhanced preparation and training of gifted student identification for educators, education about culturally relevant teaching practices, and improvements to the curricula in schools serving minority and low-income students.
BeasleyS. T.Chapman-HilliardC.McClainS. (2016). Linking the emancipatory pedagogy of Africana/Black studies with academic identify outcomes among Black students attending PWIs. Africology: The Journal of Pan African Studies, 9(8), 9–25.
2.
BecknellC. E. (1987). Blacks in the workforce: A Black manager’s perspective. Horizon Communications.
CalarcoJ. M. (2018). Negotiating opportunities: How the middle class secures advantages in school. Oxford University Press.
5.
CardD.GiulianoL. (2016). Universal screening increases the representation of low-income and minority students in gifted education. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(48), 13678–13683. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1605043113
6.
ChristensenR. A. (1991). A personal perspective on Tribal-Alaska Native gifted and talented education. Journal of American Indian Education, 31(1), 10–14. https://www.jstor.org/stable/i24396373
7.
CollinsK. H.JosephN. M.FordD. Y. (2020). Missing in action: Black girls in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Gifted Child Today, 43(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217519880593
8.
DarbyD.SaatciogluA. (2015). Race, inequality of opportunity, and school choice. Theory and Research in Education, 13(1), 56–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878515572288
9.
DurkeeM. I.GazleyE. R.HopeE. C.KeelsM. (2019). Cultural invalidations: Deconstructing the “acting White” phenomenon among Black and Latinx college students. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 25(4), 451–460. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000288
10.
Ecker-LysterM.NiilekselaC. (2017). Enhancing gifted education for underrepresented students: Promising recruitment and programming strategies. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353216686216
11.
FishR. E. (2017). The racialized construction of exceptionality: Experimental evidence of race/ethnicity effects on teachers’ interventions. Social Science Research, 62, 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.08.007
12.
FordD. Y. (2012). Culturally different students in special education: Looking backward to move forward. Exceptional Children, 78(4), 391–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291207800401
13.
FordD. Y. (2014). Segregation and the underrepresentation of Blacks and Hispanics in gifted education: Social inequality and deficit paradigms. Roeper Review, 36(3), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2014.919563
14.
FordD. Y.GranthamT. C.WhitingG. W. (2008). Culturally and linguistically diverse students in gifted education: Recruitment and retention issues. Exceptional Children, 74(3), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290807400302
15.
GayG. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.
16.
GrissomJ. A.ReddingC. (2016). Discretion and disproportionality: Explaining the underrepresentation of high-achieving students of color in gifted programs. AERA Open, 2(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858415622175
HamiltonR.McCoachD. B.TutwilerM. S.SiegleD.GubbinsE. J.CallahanC. M.BrodersenA. V.MunR. U. (2018). Disentangling the roles of institutional and individual poverty in the identification of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(1), 6–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217738053
19.
HenfieldM. S.WooH.BangN. M. (2017). Gifted ethnic minority students and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216674556
20.
HowardG. R. (2016). We can’t teach what we don’t know: White teachers, multiracial schools. Teachers College Press.
21.
JeynesW. H. (2007). The relationship between parental Iivolvement and urban secondary school student academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Urban Education, 42(1), 82–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085906293818
22.
KarnesF. A.StephensK. R.WhortonJ. E. (2000). Certification and specialized competencies for teachers in gifted education programs. Roeper Review, 22(3), 201–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190009554035
23.
KriegbaumK.VillarrealB.WuV. C.HeckhausenJ. (2016). Parents still matter: Patterns of shared agency with parents predict college students academic motivation and achievement. Motivation Science, 2(2), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000033
24.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1990). Like lightening in a bottle: Attempting to capture the pedagogical excellence of successful teachers of Black students. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 3(4), 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839900030403
25.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1999). Preparing teachers for diverse student populations: A critical race theory perspective. Review of Research in Education, 24, 211–247. https://doi.org/10.2307/1167271
LakinJ. M.LohmanD. F. (2011). The predictive accuracy of verbal, quantitative, and nonverbal reasoning tests: Consequences for talent identification and program diversity. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(4), 595–623. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235321103400404
28.
LareauA. (2000). Home advantage: Social class and parental intervention in elementary education. Rowman & Littlefield.
29.
LareauA. (2002). Invisible inequality: Social class and childrearing in Black families and White families. American Sociological Review, 67(5), 747–776. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088916
30.
LareauA. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. University of California Press.
LareauA.WeiningerE.CoxA. (2018). Parental challenges to organizational authority in an elite school district: The role of cultural, social, and symbolic capital. Teachers College Record, 120(1), n1.
33.
LeeJ.BowenN. K. (2006). Parental involvement, cultural capital, and the achievement gap among elementary school children. American Educational Research Journal, 43(2), 193–218. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312043002193
34.
LewisA. E.DiamondJ. B. (2015). Despite the best intentions: How racial inequality thrives in good schools. Oxford University Press.
35.
LewisN. A.SekaquaptewaD. (2016). Beyond test performance: A broader view of stereotype threat. Current Opinions in Psychology, 11, 40–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.05.002
36.
Lewis-McCoyR. H. (2014). Inequality in the promised land: Race, resources, and suburban schooling. Stanford University Press.
37.
LopezG. (2003). Parental involvement as racialized performance. In Interrogating racism in qualitative research methodology (Vol. 195, pp. 71–95). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED479264
38.
Lyken-SegosebeD.HinzS. E. (2015). The politics of parental involvement: How opportunity hoarding and prying shape educational opportunity. Peabody Journal of Education, 90(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956x.2015.988536
39.
MarlandS. P. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented, volume 1: Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education. U.S. Government Printing Office.
40.
MasseyD. S.DentonN. A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Harvard University Press.
41.
McBeeM. T. (2006). A descriptive analysis of referral sources for gifted identification screening by race and socioeconomic status. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2006-686
42.
McBeeM. T. (2010). Examining the probability of identification for gifted programs for students in Georgia elementary schools: A multilevel analysis path analysis study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(4), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986210377927
43.
Michael-ChadwellS. D. (2008). Teachers’ and parents’ perceptions concerning the underrepresentation of gifted African American students: A phenomenological study [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Phoenix].
44.
NaglieriJ. A.FordD. Y. (2003). Addressing the underrepresentation of gifted minority children using the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test (NNAT). Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(2), 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620304700206
Neal-BarnettA.StadulisR.SingerN.MurrayM.DemmingsJ. (2010). Assessing the effects of experiencing the acting white accusation. The Urban Review, 42(2), 102–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-009-0130-5
47.
OgbuJ. U. (2003). Black American students in an affluent suburb: A study of academic disengagement. Routledge.
OgbuJ. U.SimonsH. D. (1998). Voluntary and involuntary minorities: A cultural-ecological theory of school performance with some implications for education. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 29(2), 155–188. https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.1998.29.2.155
50.
Olszewski-KubiliusP. (2008). The role of the family in talent development. In PfeifferS. I. (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children: Psychoeducational theory, research, and best practices (pp. 53–70). Springer Science + Business Media.
51.
Olszewski-KubiliusP.ClarenbachJ. (2014). Closing the opportunity gap: Program factors contributing to academic success in culturally different youth. Gifted Child Today, 37(2), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217514520630
52.
Olszewski-KubiliusP.CorwithS. (2018). Poverty, academic achievement, and giftedness: A literature review. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217738015
53.
Olszewski-KubiliusP.LeeS.ThomsonD. (2014). Family environment and social development in gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(3), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986214526430
54.
Olszewski-KubiliusP.ThomsonD. (2003). Gifted education programs and procedures. In ReynoldsW. M.MillerG. E. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Educational Psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 487–510). John Wiley.
55.
PetersS. J.GentryM.WhitingG. W.McBeeM. T. (2019). Who gets served in gifted education? Demographic representation and a call for action. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(4), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219833738
56.
PetersS. J.Rambo-HernandezK.MakelM. C. (2019). Effect of local norms on racial and ethnic representation in gifted education. AERA Open, 5(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419848446
57.
PierceR. L.AdamsC. M.NeumeisterK. L. S.CassadyJ. C.DixonF. A.CrossT. L. (2007). Development of an identification procedure for a large urban school corporation: Identifying culturally diverse and academically gifted elementary students. Roeper Review, 29(2), 113–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190709554394
58.
PluckerJ. A.BurroughsN.SongR. (2010). Mind the (other) gap! The growing excellence gap in K-12 education. Center for Evaluation and Education Policy, Indiana University Bloomington.
RodaA. (2017). Parenting in the age of high-stakes testing: Gifted and talented admissions and the meaning of parenthood. Teachers College Record, 119(8), 1–53. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1143659
SkibaR.SimmonsA. B.RitterS.GibbA. C.RauschM. K.ChungC. (2008). Achieving equity in special education: History, status, and current challenges. Exceptional Children, 74(3), 264–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290807400301
63.
SperaC. (2005). A Review of the relationship among parenting practices, parenting styles, and adolescent school achievement. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 125–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-005-3950-1
64.
SteeleC. (2003). Stereotype threat and African-American student achievement. In PerryT.SteeleC.IIIHilliardA. (Eds.), Young, gifted, and black: Promoting achievement among African-American students (pp. 109–130). Beacon Press.
65.
StephensK. R.KarnesF. A. (2000). State definitions for the gifted and talented revisited. Exceptional Children, 66(2), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290006600206
66.
SwansonJ. D. (2006). Breaking through assumptions about low-income, minority gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(1), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620605000103
WildhagenT. (2011). Testing the “acting White” hypothesis: A popular explanation runs out of empirical steam. The Journal of Negro Education, 80(4), 445–463. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41341152
69.
WilsonW. J. (2011). When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor. Vintage.
70.
WorrellF. C.DixsonD. D. (2018). Recruiting and retaining underrepresented gifted students. In PfeifferS. I. (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children: Psychoeducational theory, research, and best practices (pp. 209–226). Springer.
71.
WrightB. L.FordD. Y.YoungJ. L. (2017). Ignorance or indifference? Seeking excellence and equity for under-represented students of color in gifted education. Global Education Review, 4(1), 45–60. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1137997.pdf
72.
YossoT. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361332052000341006
73.
ZhbanovaKRuleA.StichterM. (2015). Identification of gifted African American primary grade students through leadership, creativity, and academic performance in curriculum material making and peer-teaching: A case study. Early Childhood Education Journal, 43, 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-013-0628-z
