This scoping review reflects on the extant research on parents of the gifted following the last critique of the literature offered by Jolly and Matthews in 2012. The method for the search followed the PRISMA-Scr protocol utilizing the SPIDER framework. Articles fell into two main themes of parental awareness and parental actions in the inductive content analysis. Using the a priori focus areas from the Jolly and Matthews article on the second-round content analysis, articles aligned with the five focus areas: examining attitudes and expectations of nontraditional families, studying the full range of satisfaction with school programming, investigating alignment of parental understanding of terms with researchers, determining how parental understandings translate into behaviors, and reviewing relationship dynamics that contribute to underachievement. There was insufficient evidence for a COVID-19 impact on publications. Findings reflect the importance of including international literature and lay the groundwork for a robust mixed-methods synthesis.
AdamsE. L.SmithD.CaccavaleL. J.BeanM. K. (2021). Parents are stressed! Patterns of parent stress across COVID-19. Psychiatry, 12, Article 626456. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.626456
2.
AfrilyasantiR.BasthomiY. (2022). A sudden shift: Students’, teachers’, and parents’ adaptation to learning during and after Covid-19 learning. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 12(2), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.12.02.14
3.
*AlamerS. M.PhillipsonS. N.PhillipsonS.Al FafiA. I. (2023). The Saudi gifted educational and learning environment: Parents and student perspectives. High Ability Studies, 34(1), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2022.2072273
4.
ArslanK.YurtalF. (2021). Maternal relationships and motivation in gifted children. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 10(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.1055978
5.
*AsikM.ZelyurtH. (2021). Investigation of parents' views regarding the recognition and education of specially talented individuals in early childhood period. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 11(4), 44–52. https://www.pegegog.net/
*BesnoyK. D.SwoszowskiN. C.NewmanJ. L.FloydA.JonesP.ByrneC. (2015). The advocacy experiences of parents of elementary age, twice-exceptional children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59(2), 108–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986215569275
8.
*BildirenA. (2018). Developmental characteristics of gifted children aged 0-6 years: Parental observations. Early Child Development and Care, 188(8), 997–1011. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2017.1389919
9.
BosettiL.PyrytM. C. (2007). Parental motivation in school choice: Seeking the competitive edge. Journal of School Choice, 1(4), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1300/15582150802098795
10.
*Çam-TosunF.TanS. (2021). Investigation of the gifted students’ education based on its cost. Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education, 22(3), 677–698. https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.773728
11.
*ChanD. W.ChanL. K.ChanA. C. (2013). Parenting gifted children among Hong Kong Chinese parents: What differences does westernization make?Roeper Review, 35(3), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2013.794891
12.
ChellapanL.MargrainV. (2013). “If you talk, you are just talking. If I talk is that bragging?” Perspectives of parents with young gifted children in New Zealand. Applied Physics Express: The New Zealand Journal of Gifted Education, 18(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.21307/apex-2013-002
13.
*CobbC. (2012). Speed bumps, roadblocks and tollbooths: How culturally and linguistically diverse parents navigate the highways and byways of giftedness in Ontario. British Journal of Special Education, 39(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8578.2012.00531.x
14.
*CobbC. (2015). Is French immersion a special education loophole? And does it intensify issues of accessibility and exclusion?International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18(2), 170–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.887052
15.
ColangeloN.DettmannD. F. (1983). A review of research on parents and families of gifted children. Exceptional Children, 50(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440298305000103
16.
CookeA.SmithD.BoothA. (2012). Beyond PICO: The SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qualitative Health Research, 22(10), 1435–1443. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312452938
17.
CsikszentmihalyiM.CsikszentmihalyiI. S. (1993). Family influences on the development of giftedness. In BockG. R.AckrillK. (Eds.), Ciba Foundation Symposium 178–The origins and development of high ability (pp. 187–206). John Wiley & Sons.
18.
*DemirS. (2023). Identification of the academic differences of gifted children from the perspective of parents: Needs assessment for differentiation. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 11(3), 313–323. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.1290094
19.
GraneheimU. H.LindgrenB.-M.LundmanB. (2016). Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: A discussion paper. Nurse Education Today, 56, 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.06.002
*GürlenE.YurtçuM.TuranS. (2017). A study on determining the needs of gifted individuals based on parental views. Journal of Education, Culture and Society, 8(2), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs20172.193.207
JohnsonR.HodgesJ. (2023). Determining accessibility and availability of gifted information on school district websites. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 46(2), 194–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/01623532231162607
26.
JollyJ. L.MatthewsM. S. (2012). A critique of the literature on parenting gifted learners. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 35(3), 259–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353212451703
*JollyJ. L.MatthewsM. S.NesterJ. (2013). Homeschooling the gifted: A parent’s perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(2), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986212469999
30.
*Kadioglu AtesH. (2018). Problems of gifted and talented students regarding cursive handwriting: Parent opinions. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(2), 295–301. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.2.295
31.
KayaF.AydinF.SchepmanA.RodwayP.YetişensoyO.Demir KayaM. (2024). The roles of personality traits, AI anxiety, and demographic factors in attitudes toward artificial intelligence. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 40(2), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2151730
32.
*KayaN. G. (2020). Myths about creativity: A qualitative study on gifted students' parents. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 7(2), 93–98.
*KoshyV.BrownJ.JonesD.Portman SmithC. (2013). Exploring the views of parents of high ability children living in relative poverty. Educational Research, 55(3), 304–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2013.825167
35.
LevacD.ColquhounH.O’BrienK. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
36.
LouisB.LewisM. (1992). Parental beliefs about giftedness in young children and their relation to actual ability level. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(1), 27–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629203600107
37.
MakelM. C. (2009). Student and parent attitudes before and after the gifted identification process. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 33(1), 126–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320903300106
38.
*MatthewsM. S.JollyJ. L.MakelM. C.AlmhawesA.DanielsK. S.WojciechowskiJ. H. (2024). Considerations of academically talented students' homeschooling families for returning to traditional schools. Gifted Child Quarterly, 68(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862231222210
39.
MatthewsM. S.RitchotteJ. A.JollyJ. L. (2014). What’s wrong with giftedness? Parents’ perceptions of the gifted label. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 24(4), 372–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2014.990225
40.
*MatthewsM. S.WileyO.StylesA. (2023). Conceptual replication of parental influences on the academic motivation of gifted students: A self-determination theory perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46(4), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/01623532231199265
41.
*MaviD.AyyildizP.OzdemirM. (2022). A glance through the parental lens: Equity in the education of gifted children. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 23(3), 1555–1577. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.1068432
42.
McHughM. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282.
43.
*MercimekB. (2022). The views of gifted and non-gifted students' parents about their children's digital multitasking performances. MSKU Journal of Education, 9(2), 601–614. https://doi.org/10.21666/muefd.935130
44.
*MollenkopfD. L.Matyo-CeperoJ.LewisJ. D.IrwinB. A.JoyJ. (2021). Testing, identifying, and serving gifted children with and without disabilities: A multi-state parental perspective. Gifted Child Today, 44(2), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217520986589
45.
MorawskaA.SandersM. R. (2008). Parenting gifted and talented children: What are the key child behaviour and parenting issues. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 42(9), 819–827. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048670802277271
46.
*MorrisseyA. M. (2011). Maternal scaffolding of analogy and metacognition in the early pretence of gifted children. Council for Exceptional Children, 77(3), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291107700306
47.
*MunR. U.EzzaniM. D.YeungG. (2021). Parent engagement in identifying and serving diverse gifted students: What is the role of leadership?Journal of Advanced Academics, 32(4), 533–566. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202x211021836
48.
*Olszewski-KubiliusP.CorwithS. (2018). Poverty, academic achievement, and giftedness: A literature review. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217738015
49.
*ÖpenginE. (2021). Investigating stakeholder opinions on a resource room program for gifted students. Kastamonu Education Journal, 29(2), 334–347. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.747979
50.
*PeeblesJ. L.MendaglioS.McCowanM. (2023). The experience of parenting gifted children: A thematic analysis of interviews with parents of elementary-age children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 67(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862221120418
51.
*PhillipsonS. N.PhillipsonS.FrancisM. A. (2017). Validation of the family educational and learning capitals questionnaire: An Australian perspective. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40(4), 350–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353217734373
52.
ProbolusK. (2020). Gifted parents: The impact of giftedness on parenting cultures in the United States, 1920-1960. Dynamis, 40(2), 325–347. https://doi.org/10.30827/dynamis.v40i2.17969
53.
RenzulliJ. S. (1985). Are teachers of the gifted specialists? A landmark decision on employment practices in special education for the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29(1), 24–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628502900105
*RodaA. (2017). Parenting in the age of high-stakes testing: Gifted and talented admissions and the meaning of parenthood. Teachers College Record, 119(8), 1–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811711900804
*SenolF. B. (2023). An investigation of the educational problems of gifted children in the preschool period according to the perspectives of mothers. Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education, 24(1), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.933677
60.
StromR.StromS.StromP.CollinsworthP. (1994). Parent competence in families with gifted children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235329401800104
61.
*TayJ.SalazarA.LeeH. (2018). Parental perceptions of STEM enrichment for young children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 41(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353217745159
62.
TriccoA. C.LillieE.ZarinW.O’BrienK. K.ColquhounH.LevacD.MoherD.PetersM. D. J.HorsleyT.WeeksL.HempelS.AklE. A.ChangC.McGowanJ.StewartL.HartlingL.AldcroftA.WilsonM. G.GarrittyC.StrausS. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
63.
VanTassel-BaskaJ. (2006). A content analysis of evaluation findings across 20 gifted programs: A clarion call for enhanced gifted program development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(3), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620605000302
64.
VanTassel-BaskaJ.BrownE. (2022). An analysis of stakeholder perceptions of gifted programs: A report card on gifted program performance. Gifted Child Today, 45(3), 160–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/10762175221091859
*VialleW. (2017). Supporting giftedness in families: A resources perspective. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40(4), 372–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353217734375
67.
*WardmanJ. (2014). Full-year acceleration at high school: Parents support the social and emotional challenges of their children. Gifted and Talented International, 29(1–2), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2014.11678429
*WitteA. L.KiewraK. A.KassonS. C.PerryK. R. (2015). Parenting talent: A qualitative investigation of the roles parents play in talent development. Roeper Review, 37(2), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2015.1008091
71.
*WoodS. C. (2012). Examining parent and teacher perceptions of behaviors exhibited by gifted students referred for ADHD diagnosis using the Conners 3 (an exploratory study). Roeper Review, 34(3), 194–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2012.686426
72.
*YangY.LiuJ.XuC. (2023). Young gifted students' STEM learning experiences: A bioecological systems view. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 10(1), 11–32.
73.
*YaoZ.RawlinsonC.HamiltonR. (2024). Listen to the voices of gifted Chinese students in New Zealand: A culturally responsive framework. Gifted Child Quarterly, 68(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862231193700
74.
*Yiğit TekelK.EmirS. (2023). Examination of the relationship between awareness and irrational beliefs of parents with gifted children. Journal of Family Counseling and Education, 8(2), 152–169. https://doi.org/10.32568/jfce.1297904
75.
*YildizA.BaltaciS.AytekinC. (2019). A comparison of parents of gifted students and non-gifted students: A case of expectations from mathematics education. Çukurova Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 48(1), 452–497. https://doi.org/10.14812/cufej.404610
76.
*YoungM. H.BalliS. J. (2014). Gifted and talented education (GATE): Student and parent perspectives. Gifted Child Today, 37(4), 236–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217514544030
77.
ZhaiX.ChuX.ChaiC. S.JongM. S. Y.IstenicA.SpectorM.LiuJ.-B.YuanJ.LiY. (2021). A review of artificial intelligence (AI) in education from 2010 to 2020. Complexity, 2021, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8812542
78.
ZieglerA. (2005). The Actiotope model of giftedness. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 411–436). Cambridge University Press.
