Positive mentoring experiences for high school students with high academic ability who want more in-depth academic knowledge and real job expectations can contribute to individualized career guidance within the mentor’s profession. This study examined a governor’s school program that is designed as a residential mentorship program for high school students with high academic performance in the areas of engineering and marine science. Evaluation from mentors, mentees, and parents was collected after completing the program. Throughout the evaluations, we learned four lessons to develop a successful mentorship program. Setting goals and expectations, building effective communication, developing the right human resources and training, and building a developmental relationship were important elements to be considered for the development of the mentorship program.
BernsteinL.RappaportC. D.OlshoL.HuntD.LevinM. (2009). Impact evaluation of the U.S. Department of Education’s student mentoring program. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20094047/pdf/20094047.pdf
2.
BloomB. S. (1985). Developing talent in young people. Ballantine.
3.
CoplinB. (2012). 10 things employers want you to learn in college, revised: The skills you need to succeed. Ten Speed Press.
4.
DarlingN. (2005). Mentoring adolescents. In DuBoisD. L.KarcherM. J. (Eds.), Handbook of youth mentoring (pp. 177–190). SAGE.
5.
FengA. X. (2007). Developing personalized learning experiences: Mentoring for talent development. In VanTassel-BaskaJ. L. (Ed.), Serving gifted learners beyond the traditional classroom (pp. 189–212). Prufrock Press.
HarleyC. (2013). A win for science: The benefits of mentoring high school students in the lab. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 12, E1–E5.
9.
HousandB.HousandA. (2012). The role of technology in gifted students’ motivation. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 706–715. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21629
10.
KarcherM. J. (2005). The effects of school-based developmental mentoring and mentors’ attendance on mentees’ self-esteem, behavior, and connectedness. Psychology in the Schools, 42(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20025
11.
KarnesF.StephensK. (2005). Developing mentorship programs for gifted students. Prufrock Press.
12.
LaroseS.TarabulsyG. M. (2005). Academically at-risk students. In DuBoisD. L.KarcherM. J. (Eds.), Handbook of youth mentoring (pp. 440–453). SAGE.
LevE.KolassaJ.BakkenL. (2010). Faculty mentors’ and students’ perceptions of students’ research self-efficacy. Nurse Education Today, 30(2), 169–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2009.07.007
15.
LittleA.KearneyL. K.BritnerP. A. (2010). Students’ self-concept and perceptions of mentoring relationships in a summer mentorship program for talented adolescents. Roeper Review, 32(3), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2010.485307
16.
NashW. R.HaenslyP. A.RodgersV. J. S.WrightN. L. (1993). Mentoring: Extending learning for gifted students. In MakerC. J. (Ed.), Critical issues in gifted education (pp. 313–341). Pro-Ed.
17.
National Science Foundation. (2014). Science and engineering indicators 2014.
18.
NeumeisterK. S.BurneyV. H. (2019). Gifted program evaluation: A handbook for administrators and coordinators (2nd ed.). Prufrock Press.
19.
PleissM. K.FeldhusenJ. F. (1995). Mentors, role models, and heroes in the lives of gifted children. Educational Psychologist, 30(3), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3003_6
20.
RhodesJ. E. (2002). Stand by me: The risks and rewards of mentoring today’s youth. Harvard University Press.
21.
RossmanG. B.RallisS. F. (2012). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
22.
SmithT. S. (2013). Undergraduate curricular peer mentoring programs: Perspectives on innovation by faculty, staff, and students. Lexington Books.
23.
SmithW. S.ErbT. O. (1986). Effect of women science career role models on early adolescents’ attitudes toward scientists and women in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(8), 667–676. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660230802
24.
SosniakL. A. (2006). Retrospective interviews in the study of expertise and expert performance. In EricssonK. A.CharnessN.FeltovichP. J.HoffmanR. R. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 287–301). Cambridge University Press.
25.
StoutJ. G.DasguptaN.HunsingerM.McManusM. A. (2011). STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women’s self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021385
26.
StumboN.LewisP.BlegenA. (2008). Two mentorship case studies of high school and university students with disabilities: Milestones and lessons. Journal of Rehabilitation, 74(3), 45–51.
27.
SubotnikR. F.EdmistonA. M.CookL.RossM. D. (2010). Mentoring for talent development, creativity, social skills, and insider knowledge: The APA Catalyst Program. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21(4), 714–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X1002100406
WilsonZ. S.HolmesL.DegravellesK.SylvainM. R.BatisteL.JohnsonM.McGuireS. Y.PangS.-S.WarnerI. M. (2011). Hierarchical mentoring: A transformative strategy for improving diversity and retention in undergraduate STEM disciplines. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(1), 148–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9292-5
