The overall goal of the study was to delineate educational and career aftereffects of the long-held aims behind the formation of specialized science high schools and to provide insight into the educational practices that appear to be most strongly associated with these ideal outcomes.
AlmarodeJ. T.SubotnikR. F.CroweE.TaiR. H.LeeG. M.NowlinF. (2014). Specialized high schools and talent search programs: Incubators for adolescents with high ability in STEM disciplines. Journal of Advanced Academics, 25, 307-331.
2.
ColangeloN.AssoulineS. G.GrossM. U. M. (Eds.). (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students (Vol. 2). Iowa City: University of Iowa.
3.
ColangeloN.DavisG. A. (2003). Handbook of gifted education. New York, NY: Pearson Education.
4.
HattieJ. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
5.
HattieJ. A. C. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
6.
KirschnerP.SwellerJ.ClarkR. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75-86.
7.
KlahrD.NigamM. (2004). The equivalence of learning paths in early science instruction: Effect of direct instruction and discovery learning. Psychological Science, 15, 661-667.
8.
KulikC.-L.KulikJ. A. (1982). Effects of ability grouping on secondary school students: A meta-analysis of evaluation findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 415-428.
9.
KulikJ. A.KulikC.-L. (1984). Effects of accelerated instruction on students. Review of Educational Research, 54, 409-425.
10.
MarzanoR. J.PickeringD. J.PollockJ. E. (2004). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Curriculum and Development.
11.
NyeB.KonstantanopoulosS.HedgesL. V. (2004). How large are teacher effects?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, 237-257.
12.
SandersW. L.HornS. P. (1998). Research findings from the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS) database: Implications for educational evaluation and research. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12, 247-256.
13.
SubotnikR. F.EdmistonA.LeeG. M.AlmarodeJ.TaiR. H. (2012). Exploring intensive educational experiences for adolescents talented in science. In ZieglerA.PerlethC. (Eds.), Excellence: Essays in honour of Kurt A. Heller (pp. 143-157). Zürich, Switzerland: LIT Verlag Gmbh.
SubotnikR. F.TaiR. H.AlmarodeJ.CroweE. (2013). What are the value added contributions of selective secondary schools of mathematics, science and technology to the preparation of scientists?Talent Development & Excellence, 5(1), 87-97.
16.
SubotnikR. F.TaiR. H.RickoffR.AlmarodeJ. (2010). Specialized public high schools of science, mathematics, and technology and the STEM pipeline: What do we know now and what will we know in 5 years?Roeper Review, 32, 7-16. doi:10.1080/02783190903386553
17.
WenglinskyH. (2000). How teaching matters: Bringing the classroom back into discussions of teacher quality. Princeton, NJ: Milken Family Foundation and Educational Testing Service.
