Underachievement often begins in middle school for gifted students. Unfortunately, there is no single intervention that will ameliorate underachievement for all gifted students. To date, interventions aimed at reversing the underachieving behaviors of gifted middle school students have been inconsistent and inconclusive. To create an effective plan to reverse gifted underachievement, the field of gifted education must look closely at the research-based practices of special education. Functional Behavioral Analysis (FBA) is a viable way to accomplish this task. A team of individuals invested in the student’s success first target the source(s) of the student’s underachieving behavior, and then, together, they develop an individualized intervention plan. Although there is no magical cure for underachievement, steps can be taken to help middle school gifted students become achievers. This article will explore who the middle school gifted underachiever is and why he or she may begin to underachieve, review interventions that have been researched for this population, and provide a step-by-step plan for the reversal of gifted underachievement at the middle school level.
BaileyC. (2011). An examination of the relationships between ego development, Dabrowski’s theory of positive disintegration, and the behavioral characteristics of gifted adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55, 208-222. doi:10.1177/0016986211412180
2.
BrownC. S.LeaperC. (2010). Latina and European American girls’ experiences with academic sexism and their self-concepts in mathematics and science during adolescence. Sex Roles, 63, 860-870. doi:10:1007/s11199-010-9856-5
3.
BurkeM. D.Hagan-BurkeS.SugaiG. (2003). The efficacy of function-based interventions for students with learning disabilities who exhibit escape-maintained problem behaviors: Preliminary results from a single-case experiment. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 26, 15-25.
4.
ColvinG. (2004). Managing the cycle of serious acting-out behaviors. Eugene, OR: Behavior Associates.
5.
ComptonM. F. (1982). The gifted underachiever in the middle school. Roeper Review, 4, 23-25.
6.
DavisG. A.RimmS. B.SiegleD. (2011). Education of the gifted and talented (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
7.
DeauxK.BikmanN.GilkesA.VentuneacA.JosephY.PayneY. A. (2007). Becoming American: Stereotype threat effects in Afro-Caribbean immigrant groups. Social Psychology Quarterly, 70, 384-404.
8.
DiazE. I. (1998). Perceived factors influencing the academic underachievement of talented students of Puerto Rican descent. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 105-122.
9.
DrasgowE.MartinC. A.O’NeilR. E.YellM. L. (2013). Functional behavioral assessments, behavior intervention plans, and the collection of data on student progress. In YellM. L.MeadowsN. B.DrasowE.ShrinerJ. G. (Eds.), Evidence-based practices for education with students with emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 103-132). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
10.
DunlapG.Kern-DunlapL.ClarkeS.RobbinsF. R. (1991). Functional assessment, curricular revision, and severe behavior problems. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 387-397.
ErvinR. A.DuPaulG. J.KernL.FrimanP. C. (1998). Classroom-based functional and adjunctive assessments: Proactive approaches to intervention selection for adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 65-78.
13.
GerstenR.FuchsL. S.ComptonD.CoyneM.GreenwoodC.InnocentiM. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Council for Exceptional Children, 71, 149-164.
14.
Hagan-BurkeS.BurkeM. D.SugaiG. (2007). Using structural analysis and academic -based intervention for a student at risk of EBD. Behavioral Disorders, 32, 175-191.
15.
HébertT. H.ReisS. M. (1999). Culturally diverse high-achieving students in an urban high school. Urban Education, 34, 428-457.
16.
KanevskyL.KeighleyT. (2003). To produce or not to produce? Understanding boredom and the honor in underachievement. Roeper Review, 26, 20-28.
17.
LaneK. L.RogersL. A.ParksR. J.WeisenbachJ. L.MauA. C.MerwinM. T.BergmanW. A. (2007). Function-based interventions for students who are nonresponsive to primary and secondary prevention efforts: Illustrations at the elementary and middle school levels. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 15, 169-183.
18.
LaneK. L.WeisenbachJ. L.PhillipsA.WehbyJ. H. (2007). Designing, implementing, and evaluating function-based interventions using a systemic, feasible approach. Behavioral Disorders, 32, 122-139.
19.
LupartJ. L.PyrytM. C. (1996). “Hidden gifted” students: Underachiever prevalence and profile. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20, 36-53.
20.
MatthewsM. (2006). Gifted students dropping out: Recent findings from a southeastern state. Roeper Review, 28, 216-223.
21.
McCallR. B.EvahnC.KratzerL. (1992). High school underachievers: What do they achieve as adults?Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22.
McCoachD. B.SiegleD. (2003). The School Attitude Assessment Survey-Revised: A new instrument to identify academically able students who underachieve. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 414-429. doi:10.1177/0013164403063003005
23.
MooreJ.FordD. Y.MilnerH. (2005). Recruitment is not enough: Retaining African American students in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 51-67.
24.
O’NeilR. E.HornerR. H.AlbinR. W.SpragueJ.StoreyK.NewtonJ. S. (1997). Functional assessment and program development for problem behavior: A practical handbook. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
25.
PetersonJ. S. (2001). Successful adults who were once adolescent underachievers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45, 215-229.
26.
PetersonJ. S.ColangeloN. (1996). Gifted achievers and underachievers: A comparison of patterns found in school files. Journal of Counseling & Development, 74, 399-406.
27.
RayneriL. J.GerberB. L.WileyL. P. (2006). The relationship between classroom environment and the learning style preferences of gifted middle school students and impact on levels of performance. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50, 104-118.
28.
ReedC. F. (2004). Mathematically gifted in the heterogeneously grouped classroom: What is a teacher to do?The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 15(3), 89-95.
29.
ReisS. M.DiazE. I. (1999). Economically disadvantaged urban female students who achieve in school. The Urban Review, 31, 31-54.
30.
ReisS. M.McCoachD. B. (2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go?Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 152-170.
31.
RenzulliJ. S.ParkS. (2000). Gifted dropouts: The who and the why. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 261-271.
32.
RimmS.LoweB. (1988). Family environments of underachieving gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 353-358.
33.
RitchotteJ. (2015). Ungifting the gifted underachiever. Teaching for High Potential, 1, 16-18.
34.
RubensteinL. D.SiegleD.ReisS. M.McCoachD. B.BurtonM. G. (2012). A complex quest: The development and research of underachievement interventions for gifted students. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 678-694.
35.
SchmaderT. (2002). Gender identification moderates stereotype threat effects on women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 194-201.
36.
SiegleD.RubensteinL.MitchellM. S. (2014). Honors students’ perceptions of their high school experiences: The influence of teachers on student motivation. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58, 35-50. doi:10.1177/0016986213513496
37.
SteegeM. W.WatsonT. S. (2008). Best practices in functional behavioral assessment. In ThomasA.GrimesJ. (Eds.). Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 337-348). Bethesda, MD: National Association for School Psychologists.
38.
UmbreitJ.FerroJ.LiaupsinC. J.LaneK. L. (2007). Functional behavioral assessment and function-based intervention: An effective, practical approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Press.
39.
WeinerB. (1992). Human Motivation: Metaphors, theories and research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
40.
WhitmoreJ. R. (1980). Giftedness, conflict, and underachievement. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
41.
WoodB. K.UmbreitJ.LiaupsinC. J.GreshamF. M. (2007). A treatment integrity analysis of function-based intervention. Education & Treatment of Children, 30(4), 105-120.
42.
ZabloskiJ.MilacciF. (2012). Gifted dropouts: Phenomenological case studies of rural gifted students. Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research, 6, 175-190.
