Effective program models are needed for low-income youth. This article describes one successful summer enrichment program, University for Young People’s Project Promise, and outlines three key components of a Partnership for Promoting Potential in Low-Income Gifted Students (Partnership Model), which is based on Lee, Olszewski-Kubilius, and Peternel’s model. The Partnership Model provides a multi-generational perspective and framework for designing and enhancing summer enrichment programs.
BorlandJ. H.SchnurR.WrightL. (2000). Economically disadvantaged students in a school for the academically gifted: A postpositivist inquiry into individual and family adjustment. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 13-32. doi:10.1177/001698620004400103
2.
CeciS. J.PapiernoP. B. (2005). The rhetoric and reality of gap closing: When the “have-nots” gain but the “haves” gain even more. American Psychologist, 60, 149-160. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.2.149
3.
Center for Talent Development. (2014). Summer programs for academically talented students completing grades Pre-K through 12th grade. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Center for Talent Development. Retrieved from http://www.ctd.northwestern.edu/summer/
4.
ClasenD. R. (2006). Project STREAM: A 13-year follow-up of a pre-college program for middle-and high-school underrepresented gifted. Roeper Review, 29, 55-63. doi:10.1080/02783190609554385
HendersonA. T.MappK. L. (2002). A new wave of evidence: The impact of school, family, and community connections on student achievement. Austin, TX: National Center for Family & Community Connections With Schools. Retrieved from http://www.sedl.org/connections/resources/evidence.pdf
JohnsenS. K.FeuerbacherS.WitteM. M. (2007). Increasing the retention of gifted students from low-income backgrounds in university programs for the gifted: The UYP project. In VanTassel-BaskaJ. (Ed.), Serving gifted learners beyond the traditional classroom (pp. 55-79). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
11.
KaulC. R. (2014). Long-term effects of a summer enrichment program on low-income gifted students (Master’s thesis). ProQuest Dissertations and theses data-base (UMI No. 1566278).
12.
KitanoM. K. (2003). Gifted potential and poverty: A call for extraordinary action. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 26, 292-303. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ787899.pdf
13.
LeeS.-Y.Olszewski-KubiliusP.PeternelG. (2009). Follow-up with students after 6 years of participation in Project EXCITE. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 137-156. doi:10.1177/0016986208330562
14.
LeeS.-Y.Olszewski-KubiliusP.PeternelG. (2010). Achievement after participation in a preparatory program for verbally talented students. Roeper Review, 32, 150-163. doi:10.1080/02783193.2010.485301
15.
Olszewski-KubiliusP. (2007). Working with promising learners form poverty: Lessons learned. In VanTassel-BaskaJ.StambaughT. (Eds.), Overlooked gems: A national perspective on low-income promising learners. Proceedings from the national leadership conference on low-income promising learner (pp. 43-46). National Association for Gifted Children. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED494579.pdf
16.
Olszewski-KubiliusP.ClarenbachJ. (2012). Unlocking emergent talent: Supporting high achievement of low-income, high ability students. Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED537321.pdf
17.
Olszewski-KubiliusP.ThomsonD. L. (2010). Gifted programming for poor or minority urban students: Issues and lessons learned. Gifted Child Today, 33, 58-64. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ898573.pdf
18.
Olszewski-KubiliusP.ThomsonD. L. (in press). Talent development framework for gifted education. Gifted Child Today, 38(1).
19.
Purdue College of Education. (2014). Gifted education resource institute. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University. Retrieved from http://www.geri.education.purdue.edu/
20.
StambaughT. (2007). Next steps: An impetus for future directions in research, policy, and practice for low-income promising learners. In VanTassel-BaskaJ.StambaughT. (Eds.), Overlooked gems: A national perspective on low-income promising learners. Proceedings from the national leadership conference on low-income promising learner (pp. 83-88). Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED494579.pdf
21.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12, 3-54. doi:10.1177/1529100611418056
22.
VanTassel-BaskaJ. (1984). The benefits of summer programing for gifted adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 8, 73-82.
23.
VanTassel-BaskaJ. (1998). Excellence in educating gifted & talented learners. Denver, CO: Love Publishing.
William & Mary. (2014). Center for gifted education. Williamsburg, VA: William & Mary School of Education. Retrieved from http://education.wm.edu/centers/cfge/
WorrellF. C.SzarkoJ. E.GabelkoN. H. (2000). Multi-year persistence of nontraditional students in an academic talent development program. Journal of Advanced Academics, 12, 80-89. doi:10.4219/jsge-2000-646
