Previous studies on poverty within the gifted population have shown that economically vulnerable gifted students are underrepresented in gifted programs. Moreover, the majority of published studies on this topic were conducted in Western cultures. We explored the psychological, cognitive, academic, social, and environmental supports for economically vulnerable students in the Arab culture. The sample consisted of 142 male and female students who were randomly selected from 10 middle schools in rural areas in Egypt. To assess the supports of gifted students, researchers developed a self-report questionnaire. Grade point average was used as an indicator of academic achievement. Results from cluster analysis showed that there were three profiles for low-income gifted students. Multiple regression analysis indicated that environmental, social, and psychological supports explained 44% of the variance in academic achievement. Environmental supports played the most effective role in predicting students’ academic achievement, followed by social and psychological supports.
AljughimanA.AyoubA. (2012). The effect of an enrichment program on developing analytical, creative, and practical abilities of elementary gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 35(1), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0162353212440616
2.
AljughimanA.AyoubA.AboudY. (2012). Determine the needs of gifted students in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and their differences in different environments. MAWIBA.
3.
AugustineC. H.McCombsJ. S.PanseJ. F.SchwartzH. L.SchweigJ.McEachinA.Siler-EvansK. (2016). Learning from summer: Effects of voluntary summer learning programs on low-income urban youth. RAND.
4.
AyoubA.AljughaimanA. (2016). A predictive structural model for gifted students’ performance: A study based on intelligence and its implicit theories. Learning and Individual Differences, 51(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.018.
5.
BegorayD.SlovinskyK. (1997). Pearls in shells: Preparing teachers to accommodate gifted low income populations. Roeper Review, 20(1), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199709553851
6.
BorlandJ. H.SchnurR.WrightL. (2000). Economically disadvantaged students in a school for the academically gifted: A postpositivist inquiry into individual and family adjustment. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(1), 13–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620004400103
CrossJ. R.FrazierA. D.KimM.CrossT. L. (2018). A comparison of perceptions of barriers to academic success among high-ability students from high- and low-income groups: Exposing poverty of a different kind. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(1), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217738050
9.
DevereuxS.AbdulaiA.CuestaJ.GupteJ.RagnoL. P.RoelenK.Sabates-WheelerR.SpadaforaT. (2018). Can social assistance (with a child lens) help in reducing urban poverty in Ghana?Evidence, challenges and the way forward (Innocenti Working Papers No. 2018-16). UNICEF Office of Research. https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/WP%202018-16.pdf
10.
EngleP. L.BlackM. M. (2008). The effect of poverty on child development and educational outcomes. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1136(1), 243–256.
GallegosA. M. (1973). The gifted poor. Educational Leadership, 30(8), 749–753.
14.
HamiltonR.McCoachD. B.TutwilerM. S.SiegleD.GubbinsE. J.CallahanC. M.MunR. U. (2018). Disentangling the roles of institutional and individual poverty in the identification of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(1), 6–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217738053
15.
HarrisB.PluckerJ. (2014). Achieving equity and excellence: The role of school mental health providers in shrinking excellence gaps. Gifted Child Today, 37(2), 111–118.
16.
HooperD.CoughlanJ.MullenM. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.
17.
HornC. V. (2015). Young scholars: A talent development model for finding and nurturing potential in underserved populations. Gifted Child Today, 38(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217514556532
18.
KaulC. R.JohnsenS. K.SaxonT. F.WitteM. M. (2016). Project promise: A long-term follow-up of low-income gifted students who participated in a summer enrichment program. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 39(1), 83–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353216640938
KitanoM. K. (2003). Gifted potential and poverty: A call for extraordinary action. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 26(4), 292–303. https://doi.org/10.4219/jeg-2003-305
21.
KitanoM. K.LewisR. B. (2007). Examining the relationships between reading achievement and tutoring duration and content for gifted culturally and linguistically diverse students from low-income backgrounds. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(3), 295–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320703000302
22.
LakinJ. M. (2018). Making the cut in gifted selection: Score combination rules and their impact on program diversity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(2), 210–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217752099
23.
LittleC. A.AdelsonJ. L.KearneyK. L.CashK.O’BrienR. (2018). Early opportunities to strengthen academic readiness: Effects of summer learning on mathematics achievement. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(1), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217738052
24.
MadrickJ. (2020). Invisible Americans: The tragic cost of child poverty. Knopf.
Olszewski-KubiliusP.ClarenbachJ. (2012). Unlocking emergent talent: Supporting high achievement of low-income, high ability students. National Association for Gifted Children.
28.
Olszewski-KubiliusP.CorwithS. (2018). Poverty, academic achievement, and giftedness: A literature review. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217738015
29.
PetersS. J.EngerrandK. G. (2016). Equity and excellence: Proactive efforts in the identification of underrepresented students for gifted and talented services. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(3), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216643165
30.
PetersS. J.Rambo-HernandezK.MakelM. C.MatthewsM. S.PluckerJ. A. (2017). Should millions of students take a gap year? Large numbers of students start the school year above grade level. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(3), 229–238.
31.
PluckerJ. A.HardestyJ.BurroughsN. (2013). Talent on the sidelines: Excellence gaps and America’s persistent talent underclass. Center for Education Policy Analysis, Neag School of Education, University of Connecticut.
32.
PluckerJ. A.PetersS. J. (2016). Excellence gaps in education: Expanding opportunities for talented youth. Harvard Education Press.
33.
PluckerJ. A.PetersS. J. (2018). Closing poverty-based excellence gaps: Conceptual, measurement, and educational issues. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217738566
34.
ReardonS. F. (2011). The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: New evidence and possible explanations. In MurnaneR.DuncanG. (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality and the uncertain life chances of low-income children (pp. 91–116). Russell Sage Foundation.
35.
RenzulliJ. R.SiegleD.ReisM. S.GavinM. K.ReedR. E. S. (2009). An investigation of the reliability and factor structure of four new scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21(1), 84–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X0902100105
36.
ShumowL. (1997). Daily experiences and adjustment of gifted low-income urban children at home and school. Roeper Review, 20(1), 35–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199709553848
37.
SimontonD. (2005). Genetics of giftedness: The implications of an emergenic epigenetic model. In SternbergR.DavidsonJ. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 312–326). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610455.018
38.
UNICEF. (2012). Measuring child poverty: New league tables of child poverty in the world’s rich countries (Innocenti Report Card 10). UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.
VanTassel-BaskaJ.FengA. X.de BruxE. (2007). A study of identification and achievement profiles of performance task-identified gifted students over 6 years. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 31(1), 7–34. https://doi.org/10.4219/jeg-2007-517
41.
VanTassel-BaskaJ.FengA. X.SwansonJ. D.QuekC.ChandlerK. (2009). Academic and affective profiles of low-income, minority, and twice-exceptional gifted learners: The role of gifted program membership in enhancing self. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20(4), 702–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X0902000406
42.
VanTassel-BaskaJ.JohnsonD.AveryL. D. (2002). Using performance tasks in the identification of economically disadvantaged and minority gifted learners: Findings from Project STAR. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46(2), 110–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620204600204
43.
VanTassel-BaskaJ.StambaughT. (2007). Overlooked gems: A national perspective on low-income promising learners. National Association for Gifted Children.
44.
VanTassel-BaskaJ.StambaughT. (2018). Introduction to the special issue on gifted students from low-income households. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217737619
WynerJ. S.BridgelandJ. M.DiIulioJ. J.Jr. (2007). Achievement trap: How America is failing millions of high-achieving students from lower-income families. http://www.jkcf.org/assets/1/7/Achievement_Trap.pdf
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
