Gifted and talented (GT) learners in most classroom settings endure unchallenging curriculum, a slow pace of instruction, and a state of ignorance by many of their general education teachers. The authors wanted to know how in-service teachers, preservice teacher candidates, and preservice education students viewed GT learners. The authors also wanted to know how their respondents felt about teacher training specific to the nature and needs of GT learners. Information was gathered via pre/postcourse questionnaires to describe existing beliefs and assumptions that individuals in various phases of teacher development held regarding GT learners. Findings suggest that the preconceived beliefs held by individuals about GT learners guide the willingness and approaches used to teach children more so than specific training in the nature/needs of learners.
BainS. K.BlissS. L.ChoateS. M.Sager BrownK. (2007). Serving children who are gifted: Perceptions of undergraduates planning to become teachers. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30, 450-478.
2.
CallahanC. M. (2009). Myth 3: A family of identification myths: Your sample must be the same as the population. There is a “silver bullet” in identification. There must be “winners” and “losers” in identification and programming. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 239-241.
3.
Cochran-SmithM.ZeichnerK. M. (2007). Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
CooperC. R. (2009). Myth 18: It is fair to teach all children the same way. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 283-285.
5.
CroftL. (2003). Teachers of the gifted: Gifted teachers? In ColangeloN.DavisG. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 558-571). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
6.
Darling-HammondL. (1997). The right to earn: A blueprint for creating schools that work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7.
Darling-HammondL.BransfordJ. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
8.
FeldhusenH. (1981). Teaching gifted, creative, and talented students in an individualized classroom. Gifted Child Quarterly, 25, 108-111.
9.
FeldhusenJ. F. (1995). Talent development during the high school years. Gifted Education International, 10, 60-64.
10.
FeldhusenJ. F. (1997). Educating teachers for work with talented youth. In ColangeloN.DavisG. A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 547-552). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
11.
GearG. (1978). Effects of training on teachers’ accuracy in the identification of gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 22, 90-97.
12.
GraffamB. (2006). A case study of teachers of gifted learners: Moving from prescribed practice to described practitioners. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50, 119-131.
13.
HanninanG. E. (1988). A study of teacher-training in gifted education. Roeper Review, 10, 139-144.
14.
HansenJ.FeldhusenJ. (1994). Comparison of trained and untrained teachers of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 115-121.
15.
Hertberg-DavisH. (2009). Myth 7: Differentiation in the regular classroom is equivalent to gifted programs and is sufficient: Classroom teachers have the time, the skill, and the will to differentiate adequately. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 251-253.
16.
Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110–315. §, 2, 122 Stat. 3133 (2008).
17.
HultgrenH. W.SeeleyK. R. (1982). Training teachers of the gifted: A research monograph on teacher competencies. Denver, CO: University of Denver, School of Education.
18.
JohnsenS. K.VanTassel-BaskaJ.RobinsonA. (2008). Using the National Gifted Education Standards for university teacher preparation programs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
19.
KaplanS. N. (2009). Myth 9: There is a single curriculum for the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 257-258.
20.
MakerC. J. (1975). Training teachers for the gifted and talented. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
21.
McCoachD. B.SiegleD. (2007). What predicts teachers’ attitudes toward the gifted?Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 246-255.
22.
MillsC. (2003). Characteristics of effective teachers of gifted students: Teacher background and personality styles of students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 272-281.
23.
MoonS. M. (2009). Myth 15: High-ability students don’t face problems and challenges. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 274-276.
24.
National Association for Gifted Children/Council for Exceptional Children. (2006). Initial knowledge and skill standards for gifted education. Available from http://www.cectag.org
25.
PetersonJ. S. (2009). Myth 17: Gifted and talented individuals do not have unique social and emotional needs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 280-282.
26.
ReisS. M.RenzulliJ. S. (2009). Myth 1: The gifted and talented constitute one single homogeneous group and giftedness is a way of being that stays in the person over time and experiences. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 233-235.
27.
SchönD. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
28.
StoryC. M. (1985). Facilitator of learning: A microethnographic study of the teacher of the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29, 155-159.
29.
StrongeJ. H.TuckerP. D.HindmanJ. L. (Eds.). (2004). Handbook for qualities of effective teachers. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
30.
TomlinsonC. (2005). Quality curriculum and instruction for highly able students. Theory Into Practice, 44, 160-166.
31.
TomlinsonC.KaplanS.PurcellJ.LeppienJ.BurnsD.StricklandC. (2005). The parallel curriculum in the classroom: Essays for application across the content area, K-12. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
32.
WorrellF. C. (2009). Myth 4: A single test score or indicator tells us all we need to know about giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 242-244.
