This meta-analysis examined special education professional development (PD) designed to improve outcomes for students with disabilities or to train teachers on evidence-based instruction and interventions in special education. The primary focus was on the impact of special education PD on teachers’ skills, beliefs, and knowledge. A secondary aim was to examine the impact on student outcomes. Results indicated that PD had a greater effect on teacher-related measures (g = 0.53) compared with student measures (g = 0.17). All studies included active participation opportunities and PD topics covered literacy, behavioral support, explicit instruction, and data-based decision-making. The findings emphasize the importance for PD to apply content knowledge to evidence-based practices in special education.
AlldayR. A.Neilsen-GattiS.HudsonT. M. (2013). Preparation for inclusion in teacher education pre-service curricula. Teacher Education and Special Education, 36(4), 298–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406413497485
AudS.HussarW.PlantyM.SnyderT.BiancoK.FoxM.FrohlichL.KempJ.DrakeL. (2010). The condition of education 2010 (NCES 2010-028). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
4.
BennerG. J.FildermanM. J.Barnard-BrakL.PennefatherJ.SmithJ. L. M.StryckerL. A. (2023). Evidence of efficacy of the Integrated Literacy Study Group professional learning program to enhance reading instruction for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Psychology in the Schools, 60, 1182–1198. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22773
5.
BlankR.de las AlasN. (2009). Effects of teacher professional development on gains in student achievement. Report Prepared for the Council of Chief State School Officers.
6.
BosC. S.MatherN.NarrR. F.BaburN. (1999). Interactive, collaborative professional development in early literacy instruction: Supporting the balancing act. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14(4), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1207/sldrp1404_4
7.
BrockM. E.CarterE. W. (2017). A meta-analysis of educator training to improve implementation of interventions for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 38(3), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516653477
BrownellM. T.JonesN. D.SohnH.StarkK. (2020). Improving teaching quality for students with disabilities: Establishing a warrant for teacher education practice. Teacher Education and Special Education, 43(1), 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406419880351
10.
BrykA. S.GomezL. M.GrunowA.LeMahieuP. G. (2015). Learning to improve: How America’s schools can get better at getting better. Harvard Education Press.
11.
CookB. G.BuysseV.KlingnerJ.LandrumT. J.McWilliamR. A.TankersleyM.TestD. W. (2015). CEC’s standards for classifying the evidence base of practices in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 36(4), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514557271
DesimoneL. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
14.
DidionL.FildermanM. (2024, June13). Examining teacher outcomes and professional development (TOPD): A database for systematic review. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/H6KAU
15.
DidionL.FildermanM. J.ChowJ. C.WexlerJ.VitaleJ.HartE. J.PayneS. B.OlmsteadC.RogersD. B. (2025). The effects of high-quality professional development on teachers’ skills, beliefs, and knowledge: A meta-analysis. Preprint available on the Open Science Framework. Under resubmission. https://osf.io/preprints/osf/ukjbz_v1
16.
DidionL.TosteJ. R.FildermanM. J. (2020). Teacher professional development and student reading achievement: A meta-analytic review of the effects. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 13(1), 29–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2019.1670884
17.
GeselS. A.LeJeuneL. M.ChowJ. C.SinclairA. C.LemonsC. J. (2021). A meta-analysis of the impact of professional development on teachers’ knowledge, skill, and self-efficacy in data-based decision-making. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 54(4), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221942097019
18.
GleserL. J.OlkinI. (2009). Stochastically dependent effect sizes. In CooperH.HedgesL. V.ValentineJ. C. (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 357–376). Russell Sage Foundation.
HedgesL. V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6(2), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.2307/1164588
23.
HedgesL. V.TiptonE.JohnsonM. C. (2010). Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with dependent effect size estimates. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(1), 39–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.5
24.
HemmeterM. L.SnyderP. A.FoxL.AlginaJ. (2016). Evaluating the implementation of the Pyramid Model for Promoting Social-Emotional Competence in early childhood classrooms. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 36(3), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121416653386
25.
HughesC. A.MorrisJ. R.TherrienW. J.BensonS. K. (2017). Explicit instruction: Historical and contemporary contexts. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32(3), 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12142
26.
KennedyM. J.HirschS. E.RodgersW. J.BruceA.LloydJ. W. (2017). Supporting high school teachers’ implementation of evidence-based classroom management practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.12.009
27.
KuriyanA. B. (2015). The effectiveness of an online workshop on behavior management as a professional development tool for teachers [Doctoral dissertation, Florida International University]. ProQuest Dissertation Publishing.
28.
LembkeE. S.McMasterK. L.SmithR. A.AllenA.BrandesD.WagnerK. (2018). Professional development for data-based instruction in early writing: Tools, learning, and collaborative support. Teacher Education and Special Education, 41(2), 106–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406417730112
29.
McCollumJ. A.HemmeterM. L.HsiehW.-Y. (2013). Coaching teachers for emergent literacy instruction using performance-based feedback. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 33(1), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121411431003
30.
McLeskeyJ., Council for Exceptional Children, & Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform. (2017). High-leverage practices in special education. Council for Exceptional Children.
31.
MurrayD. W.RabinerD. L.KuhnL.PanY.SabetR. F. (2018). Investigating teacher and student effects of the Incredible Years Classroom Management Program in early elementary school. Journal of School Psychology, 67, 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.10.004
32.
National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). (2024). The Nation’s Report Card: 2024 mathematics and reading assessments. http://www.nationsreportcard.gov
33.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, § 115, Stat. 1425 (2002).
34.
PageM. J.McKenzieJ. E.BossuytP. M.BoutronI.HoffmannT. C.MulrowC. D.TetzlaffJ. M.AklE. A.BrennanS. E.ChouR.GlanvilleJ.GrimshawJ. M.HróbjartssonA.LaluM. M.LiT.LoderE. W.Mayo-WilsonE.McDonaldS.McGuinnessL. A.StewartL. A.ThomasJ.TriccoA. C.WelchV. A.WhitingP.MoherD. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372, Article n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
35.
PiastaS. B.JusticeL. M.O’ConnellA. A.MauckS. A.Weber-MayrerM.SchachterR. E.FarleyK. S.SpearC. F. (2017). Effectiveness of large-scale, state-sponsored language and literacy professional development on early childhood educator outcomes. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10(2), 354–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2016.1270378
36.
ReddyL. A.GloverT. A.DudekC. M.AlperinA.WiggsN. B.BronsteinB. (2022). A randomized trial examining the effects of paraprofessional behavior support coaching for elementary students with disruptive behavior disorders: Paraprofessional and student outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 92, 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2022.04.002
37.
ReddyL. A.ShernoffE.LekwaA. (2021). A randomized controlled trial of instructional coaching in high-poverty urban schools: Examining teacher practices and student outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 86, 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2021.04.001
38.
RodgersM. A.PustejovskyJ. E. (2021). Evaluating meta-analytic methods to detect selective reporting in the presence of dependent effect sizes. Psychological Methods, 26(2), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000300
39.
*SandilosL.GobleP.SchwartzS. (2020). Burnout and Teacher-child interactions: The moderating influence of SEL interventions in Head Start classrooms. Early Education and Development, 31(7), 1169–1185. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2020.1788331
40.
SimsS.Fletcher-WoodH. (2021). Identifying the characteristics of effective teacher professional development: A critical review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 32(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1772841
41.
SindelarP. T.BrownellM. T.BillingsleyB. (2010). Special education teacher education research: Current status and future directions. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33(1), 8–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/088840640935859
42.
*SnyderP.HemmeterM. L.McLeanM.SandallS.McLaughlinT.AlginaJ. (2018). Effects of professional development on preschool teachers’ use of embedded instruction practices. Exceptional Children, 84(2), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402917735512
43.
SteedE. A.DurandV. M. (2013). Optimistic teaching: Improving the capacity for teachers to reduce young children’s challenging behavior. School Mental Health: A Multidisciplinary Research and Practice Journal, 5(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-012-9084-y
44.
StelitanoL.PereraR.JohnstonW. R. (2019). Supporting students with high-incidence disabilities in U.S. schools: National findings from the American educator panels. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2992.html
45.
Tanner-SmithE. E.TiptonE. (2014). Robust variance estimation with dependent effect sizes: Practical considerations including a software tutorial in Stata and SPSS. Research Synthesis Methods, 5(1), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1091
46.
TiptonE.PustejovskyJ. E. (2015). Small-sample adjustments for tests of moderators and model fit using robust variance estimation in meta-regression. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 40(6), 604–634. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998615606099
*WeiserB.BussC.SheilsA. P.GallegosE.MurrayL. R. (2019). Expert reading coaching via technology: Investigating the reading, writing, and spelling outcomes of students in grades K-8 experiencing significant reading learning disabilities. Annals of Dyslexia, 69(1), 54–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-018-00175-1
49.
*WexlerJ.KearnsD. M.LemonsC. J.SheltonA.PollackM. S.StapletonL. M.ClancyE.HoganE.LyonC. (2022). Improving literacy instruction in co-taught middle school classrooms to support reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 68, Article 102040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.102040
