Systematic and Sustained: Powerful Approaches for Enhancing Deep Mathematical Thinking

Burns D. E. Purcell J. H. Hertberg H. (2006). Curriculum for gifted education students. In Purcell J. H. Eckert R. D. (Eds.), Designing services and programs for high-ability learners (pp. 87–111). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Coleman M. R. (2001). Curriculum differentiation: Sophistication. Gifted Child Today, 24(2), 24–25.

Gallagher J. Gallagher S. (1994). Teaching the gifted child (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Jones M. G. Jones B. D. Hargrove T. Y. (2003). The unintended consequences of high-stakes testing. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Moon T. R. Brighton C. M. Callahan C. M. (2003). State standardized testing programs: Friend or foe in gifted education? Roeper Review, 25, 49–61.

No Child Left Behind Act, 20 U.S.C. §6301 (2001).

Schmidt W. H. McKnight C. C. Raizen S. A. (1997). A splintered vision: An investigation of U.S. science and mathematics education. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.

Scot T. P. Callahan C. M. Urquhart J. (2009). Paint-by-number teachers and cookie-cutter students: The unintended effects of high-stakes testing on the education of gifted students. Roeper Review, 31, 40–52.

Tretter T. R. (2003). Gifted students speak: Mathematics problem-solving insights. Gifted Child Today, 26(3), 22–33.