Policy Implications at the State and District Level with RtI for Gifted Students

Brown E. Avery L. Van Tassel-Baska J. Worley B. Stambaugh T. (2006). A five-state analysis of gifted education policy. Roeper Review, 29, 11–23.

Callahan C. M. (2005). Making the grade or achieving the goal? Evaluating learner and program outcomes in gifted education. In Karnes F. A. Bean S. M. (Eds.), Methods and materials for teaching the gifted (2nd ed., pp. 211–244). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

Clune W. H. (1993). The best path to systemic educational policy: Standard/centralized or differentiated/decentralized. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 233–254.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, Pub. Law 108–446 (December 3, 2004).

Mellard D. F. Johnson E. (2008). RTI: A practitioner's guide to implementing response to intervention. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

National Association of State Directors of Special Education. (2007). Response to intervention: Research for practice. Alexandria, VA: Author.

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (1993). National excellence: A case for developing America's talent. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Van Tassel-Baska J. (2003). Curriculum planning and instructional design for gifted learners. Denver: Love.

Van Tassel-Baska J. Feng A. (2004). Designing and utilizing evaluation for gifted program improvement. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

Van Tassel-Baska J. Brown E. (2009). An analysis of gifted education curricular models. In Karnes F. A. Bean S. M. (Eds.), Methods and materials for teaching the gifted (3rd ed., pp 79–105). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

Westberg K. Archambault F. Dobyns S.M. Jr. Slavin T. (1993). The classroom practices observation study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 120–146.