Scientific and technical communication to the public suffers not from problems of magnitude but from impediments to its production and consumption, especially inaccuracy, distortion, and deception. The author describes how ambiguity, self-interest, and exaggeration, for example, influence production quality, and how such factors as existing audience bias, lack of trust in scientific evidence, and resistance to change further complicate assimilation of messages about science.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barringer, F.
1998. Reporters, book deals, and conflicts. The New York Times, 8 May, A15.
2.
Colby, J. H.
1996. The picture is good at the DIA following New Era scam. The Detroit News, 20 January.
3.
Lieberman, B.1995. What the controversies over the health effects of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke tell us about the debates between objectivists and social constructionists. Qualitative Inquiry1 (2): 243-272.
4.
Mooney, L.1998. Smoking out bad science. The Wall Street Journal, 19 March.
5.
National Academy of Sciences
. 1998. Teaching about evolution and the nature of science. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
6.
Perret, G.
1996. Old soldiers never die: The life of General Douglas MacArthur. New York: Random House.
7.
Skrzycki, C.
1998. Stock recipe needs a grain of salt. The Washington Post, 16 March, A1.
8.
Vernon, P. E.
1984. Burt, Cyril L. (1883-1971). In Encyclopedia of psychology. Vol. 1. Edited by R. J. Corsini, 176. New York: John Wiley.
