This study investigated 601 stories in a segment called Earth KARE on a local TV newscast to determine how such a theme of coverage presented the environment. Despite previous findings of the prominence of science in media coverage of the environment, Earth KARE presented the environment as a government story, both in terms of news sources (40 percent) and arena of action (54 percent). The majority of station resources—use of reporters, video, and chitchat—also was allocated to government stories. The constraints faced by news directors in efficiently producing a daily thematic segment with good audience draw may create a reliance on (and deference to) the planned, reliable information provided by government and secondarily by business.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, A.1991. Source strategies and the communication of environmental affairs. Media, Culture & Society13:459-476.
2.
Andsager, J.
, and L. Smiley. 1997. Evaluating the public information function: How media agents framed the silicone breast implant controversy. Paper presented to the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, 30 July-2 August, Chicago.
3.
Atwater, T.
, and F. Fico. 1986. Source reliance and use in reporting state government: A study of print and broadcast practices. Newspaper Research Journal8 (1): 53-61.
4.
Berkowitz, D.1987. TV news sources and news channels: A study in agenda-building. Journalism Quarterly3:507-513.
5.
Berkowitz, D.1990. Refining the gatekeeping metaphor for local television news. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media34 (1): 55-68.
6.
Breed, W.1958. Mass communication and sociocultural integration. Social Forces37:109-116.
7.
Brown, J.
, C. Bybee, S. Wearden, and D. Straughan. 1987. Invisible power: Newspaper news sources and the limits of diversity. Journalism Quarterly64 (1): 45-54.
8.
Buttel, F.1992. Environmentalization: Origins, processes, and implications for rural social change. Rural Sociology57 (1): 1-27.
9.
Carroll, R. L.1985. Content values in TV news programs in small and large markets. Journalism Quarterly62:877-882.
10.
Chang, E. E.
1995. The video news release: Public relations and the television news business. Paper presented to the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, August, Washington, DC.
11.
Cooper, M.
, and Soley, L.1990. All the right sources. Mother Jones, February-March, 20-27, 45-48.
12.
Corbett, J. B.1992. Rural and urban newspaper coverage of wildlife: Conflict, community and bureaucracy. Journalism Quarterly69 (4): 929-937.
13.
Corbett, J. B.1993. Atmospheric ozone: Global or local issue? Coverage in Canadian and U.S. newspapers. Canadian Journal of Communication18:81-87.
14.
Corbett, J. B. 1994. Media, bureaucracy and the success of social protest: Media coverage of environmental movement groups. Ph.D. diss., University of Minnesota.
15.
DeMott, J.
, and E. Tom. 1990. The press corps of spaceship earth: A trend analysis, 1968-88. Newspaper Research Journal11 (4): 12-23.
16.
Dennis, E. E.
1991. In context: Environmentalism in the system of news. In Media and the environment, edited by C. L. LaMay and Everett E. Dennis. Washington, DC: Island.
17.
Detjen, J.
1997. The changing work environment of environmental reporters. Manuscript.
18.
Donohue, G. A.
, P. J. Tichenor, and C. N. Olien. 1995. A guard dog perspective on the role of media. Journal of Communication45 (2): 115-132.
19.
Drew, D.1972. Roles and decision making of three television beat reporters. Journal of Broadcasting16 (2): 165-173.
20.
Dunlap, R. E.
, and R. Scarce. 1991. The poll—poll trends: Environmental problems and protection. Public Opinion Quarterly55:651-672.
21.
Einsiedel, E.
1988. The Canadian press and the environment. Paper presented at International Association for Mass Communication Research, Barcelona, Spain.
22.
Fishman, M.
1980. Manufacturing the news. Austin: University of Texas Press.
23.
Foundation for American Communications
. 1993. The press and the environment: How journalists evaluate environmental reporting. Survey released by the Foundation for American Communications.
24.
Frazier, L.1995. Video news releases overcome era of criticism, but use and value questions still unresolved. Southern Public Relations Journal1 (2): 13-17.
25.
Friedman, S. M.
, S. Dunwoody, and C. L. Rogers. 1986. Scientists and journalists: Reporting science as news. New York: Free Press.
26.
Gandy, O. H. Jr.
1982. Beyond agenda setting: Information subsidies and public policy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
27.
Gans, H.
1979. Deciding what's news: A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. New York: Pantheon.
28.
Gigliotti, L. M.1992. Environmental attitudes: 20 years of change?Journal of Environmental Education24 (1): 15-26.
29.
Gitlin, T.
1980. The whole world is watching. Berkeley: University of California Press.
30.
Greenberg, M. R.
, P. M. Sandman, D. B. Sachsman, and K. L. Salomone. 1989. Network television news coverage of environmental risks. Environment31:16-20, 40-44.
31.
Griffin, R. J.
, and S. Dunwoody. 1995. Impacts of information subsidies and community structure on local press coverage of environmental contamination. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly72 (2): 271-284.
32.
Hackett, R. A.1985. A hierarchy of access: Aspects of source bias on Canadian TV news. Journalism Quarterly62:256-265, 277.
33.
Hansen, A.1990. Socio-political values underlying media coverage of the environment. Media Development37 (2): 3-6.
34.
Hansen, A.1991. The media and the social construction of the environment. Media, Culture & Society13:443-458.
35.
Herman, E. S.
, and N. Chomsky. 1988. Manufacturing consent. New York: Pantheon.
36.
Hilgartner, S.
, and S. L. Bosk. 1988. The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model. American Journal of Sociology94 (1): 53-78.
37.
Hunt, A.
1997. Is it really news? An analysis of video news releases. Paper presented at the conference of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, 30 July-2 August, Chicago.
38.
Liebler, C. M.
, and J. Bendix. 1996. Old-growth forests on network news: News sources and the framing of an environmental controversy. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly73 (1): 53-65.
39.
Martin, W. P.
, and M. Singletary. 1981. Newspaper treatment of state government releases. Journalism Quarterly58:93-96.
40.
McCartney, J.1997. News lite. American Journalism Review, June, 19-25.
41.
McEvoy, J.
1971. The American concern with environment. In Social behaviour, natural resources and the environment, edited by W. R. Burch. New York: Harper & Row.
42.
McGill, L.
, and A. Szanto. 1995. Headlines and sound bites: Is that the way it is?New York: Freedom Forum Media Studies Center.
43.
Mitchell, R. C.
, A. G. Mertig, and R. E. Dunlap. 1992. Twenty years of environmental mobilization. In American environmentalism: The U.S. environmental movement 1970-1990. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.
44.
Molotch, H.
, and M. Lester. 1975. Accidental news: The great oil spill as local occurrence and national event. American Journal of Sociology81:235-260.
45.
Morton, L. P.
, and J. Warren. 1992. Acceptance characteristics of hometown press releases. Public Relations Review18 (4): 385-390.
46.
Murch, A. W.1971. Public concern for environmental pollution. Public Opinion Quarterly35:100-106.
47.
Nelkin, D.
1987. Selling science: How the press covers science and technology. New York: W. H. Freeman.
48.
Olien, C. N.
, P. J. Tichenor, and G. A. Donohue. 1985. Media coverage and social movements. In Information campaigns: Balancing social values and social change, edited by C. T. Salmon. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
49.
Ottman, J. A.
1995. Green marketing: Challenges and opportunities for the new marketing age. Chicago: NTC.
50.
Paletz, D.
, and R. Entman. 1981. Media power politics. New York: Free Press.
51.
Roberts, C. L.
, and S. H. Dickson. 1984. Assessing quality in local TV news. Journalism Quarterly61:392-398.
52.
Sachsman, D. B.1976. Public relations influence on coverage of environment in San Francisco. Journalism Quarterly53 (1): 54-60.
53.
Schoenfeld, A. C.
, R. F. Meier, and R. J. Griffin. 1979. Constructing a social problem: The press and the environment. Social Problems27 (1): 38-61.
54.
Sigal, L. V.
1973. Reporters and officials. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
55.
Smith, C.1993. News sources and power elites in news coverage of the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Journalism Quarterly70:750-752.
56.
Sonenclar, B.1991. The VNR top ten. Columbia Journalism Review, March-April, 14.
57.
Stauber, J. C.
, and S. Rampton. 1995. Toxic sludge is good for you: Lies, damn lies and the public relations industry. Monroe, ME: Common Courage.
58.
Steele, J. E.1995. Experts and the operational bias of television news: The case of the Persian Gulf War. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly72 (4): 700-811.
59.
Stocking, S. H.1985. Effect of public relations efforts on media visibility of organizations. Journalism Quarterly62:358-366, 450.
60.
Tichenor, P. J.
, G. A. Donohue, and C. N. Olien. 1980. Community conflict and the press. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
61.
Trudel, M. R.1992. PR professional and TV producers: The new alliance for good television. Public Relations Quarterly37 (1): 22-23.
62.
Turk, J. V.1986. Information subsidies and media content: A study of public relations influence on the news. Journalism Monograph no. 100.
63.
Walters, L. M.
, and T. N. Walters. 1992. Environment of confidence: Daily newspaper use of press releases. Public Relations Review18 (1): 31-46.
