Films about infectious disease epidemics regularly pretend to present science at work but ironically traffic in its near opposite—a kind of “witchcraft science.” Although Hollywood can hardly be expected to cease the practice, such films present an opportunity for science to explain its true character and capabilities to a wider audience and deserve closer attention from scientists and members of the science policy community.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Foreman, C. H.
1994. Plagues, products and politics: Emergent public health hazards and national policymaking. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
2.
Garrett, L.
1994. The coming plague: Newly emerging diseases in a world out of balance. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
3.
Institute of Medicine
. 1992. Emerging infections: Microbial threats to health in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
4.
Morse, S. S.
, ed. 1993. Emerging viruses. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
Preston, R.
1994. The hot zone. New York: Random House.
6.
Rosenberg, C. E.
1962. The cholera years: The United States in 1832, 1949, and 1866. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
Russell, C.1986. Centers for disease control: 40 years of demystifying illness. Washington Post, 4 September, A15.
8.
Schwartz, J.1995. Media's portrayal of Ebola virus sparks outbreak of wild scenarios. Washington Post, 4 May, A3.
9.
Weinraub, B.1995. Wrestling a virus to the screen. New York Times, 19 March, H15.
