Demonstration projects can be an effective tool in the diffusion of information and the promotion
of new technologies and practices. This article provides a review of knowledge to date. It outlines
the characteristics of demonstration projects, their goals, methods employed, and the means by
which they are evaluated, using energy technology examples. Further, it discusses how the
effectiveness of demonstration projects can be maximized and draws conclusions concerning
their application and usefulness.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baer, W. S., Johnson, L. L., & Merrow, E. W. ( 1977). Government-sponsored demonstrations of new technologies . Science, 196, 950-957.
2.
Boyd, D. W., Borison, A. B., & Morris, P. A. ( 1983). A framework for assessing EPRI roles in commercial demonstration projects. Palo Alto, CA: Electric Power Research Institute.
3.
Brown, M. A. (1988). Technology transfer strategtes of the U.S. Department of Energy's conservation program (Tech. Rep. No. ORNL/CON-277). Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
4.
Brown, M. A., Berry, L. G. , & Goel, R. K. ( 1989). Commercializing government-sponsored innovations: Lessons learned from twelve successful case studies (Tech. Rep. No. ORNL/ CON-275) . Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
5.
Brown, M. A., & Keating, K. (Eds.). (1989). The Hood River Conservation Project [Special issue]. Energy and Buildings, 13(1).
6.
Brown, M. A., & Snell, S. A. (1988). The energy-related inventions program: An assessment of recent commercial progress (Tech. Rep. No. ORNL/CON-252) . Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
7.
Choffray, J., & Lillien, G. L. (1980). Market planning for new industrial products. New York: Ronald Press .
8.
Cohen, A. M. (1974). Change and program evaluation in social organizations. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 2, 210-226.
9.
Currie, K. (1986). Demonstrations-theory and practice. In U.K. Department of Energy, The proceedings of the International Seminar on the Promotion of Demonstrated Energy Technologies (pp. 16-26). London: U.K. Department of Energy.
10.
Gilsinan, J. F. (1984). Information and knowledge development potential: The public vs. private sector jobs demonstration project. Evaluation Review, 8, 371-388.
11.
Hirst, E. (1987). Cooperation and community conservation: The Hood River Conservation Project (Tech. Rep. No. ORNL/CON-235). Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
12.
Magill, K. P., & Rogers, E. M. (1981). Federally sponsored demonstrations of technological innovations. Knowledge, 3, 23-42.
13.
Myers, S. (1978). The demonstration project as a procedure for accelerating the application of new technology . Washington, DC: Institute of Public Administration.
14.
Rogers, E. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
15.
Rutman, L. (1975). Evaluating explorations and demonstrations for planning in criminal justice. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 2, 460-468.
16.
Schipper, L. (1987). Energy conservation policies in the OECD. Energy Policy, 15(6), 538-548.
17.
Shama, A. (Ed.). (1981). Marketing solar energy innovations. New York: Praeger.
18.
Snell, S. A., Brown, M. A. , & Zerega, A. M. ( 1988). Technology transfer for DOE's Office of Transportation Systems: Assessments and strategies (Tech. Rep. No. ORNL/CON-244). Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory .
19.
U.K. Department of Energy. (1986). The proceedings of the International Seminar on the Promotion of Demonstrated Energy Technologies. London: Author .
20.
U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. (1989). National Energy Policy Act of 1989 (energy efficiency and renewable energy): Hearing before the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Part 1. 101st Congress, first session on S. 324 to establish a national energy policy to reduce global warming, and for other purposes, March 14, 1989 . Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
21.
Vollmer, J. J. (1986). Demonstration operations: Methodology. In U.K. Department of Energy, The proceedings of the International Seminar on the Promotion of Demonstrated Energy Technologies (pp. 57-67). London: U.K. Department of Energy.
