Brewing Public Engagement With Pint of Science USA

Abstract

Amid complex global challenges and the need for informed public discourse, science outreach is more important than ever. The Pint of Science International Festival, held annually each May, convenes scientists, educators, and philosophers with the public in an informal pub setting to foster dialogue on contemporary scientific topics. Since 2012, it has welcomed over 785,000 attendees across 500 cities in 27 countries. Established in 2014, Pint of Science USA has expanded to 16 cities by 2025. This report highlights the festival’s U.S. growth, shares the 2025 National Team’s experiences, and provides a map for future growth in the United States.

Keywords

science communication science outreach Pint of Science volunteering science literacy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allum

Sibley

Sturgis

Stoneman

(2014). Religious beliefs, knowledge about science and attitudes towards medical genetics. Public Understanding of Science, 23(7), 833–849.

Aman

(2020). Transfer of knowledge through international scientific mobility: Introduction of a network-based bibliometric approach to study different knowledge types. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(2), 565–581. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00028

Aman

(2022). Internationally mobile scientists as knowledge transmitters: A lexical-based approach to detect knowledge transfer. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 73(10), 1418–1431. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24641

Arthur

Roberts

Rae

Marrison

McCleary

Abbott

Musso

(2021). Ocean outreach in Australia: How a national research facility is engaging with community to improve scientific literacy [Community case study]. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, 610115. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.610115

Bardach

S. H.

Barber

J. M.

Schmitt

F. A.

Van Eldik

L. J.

Boggess

M. B.

Yarbrough

Jones

K. C.

Jicha

G. A.

(2020). The effectiveness of community-based outreach events for the promotion of African American research participation. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, 34(4), 344–349. https://doi.org/10.1097/wad.0000000000000404

Bautista

Alfuraiji

Drangowska-Way

Gangwani

de Flamingh

Bourne

P. E.

(2022). Ten simple rules for improving communication among scientists. PLOS Computational Biology, 18(6), e1010130. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010130

The BMS Times. (2016). Pint of Science festival: Bringing scientists to a pub near you. https://thebmstimes.wordpress.com/2016/06/20/pint-of-science-festival-bringing-scientists-to-a-pub-near-you/

The Boston Calendar. (2018). Science by the Pint @ Aeronaut Brewery. https://www.thebostoncalendar.com/events/science-by-the-pint-aeronaut-brewery–4

Cuan-Baltazar

J. Y.

Muñoz-Perez

M. J.

Robledo-Vega

Pérez-Zepeda

M. F.

Soto-Vega

(2020). Misinformation of COVID-19 on the Internet: Infodemiology study. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 6(2), e18444. https://doi.org/10.2196/18444

10.

Daume

Galaz

(2016). “Anyone know what species this is?”—Twitter conversations as embryonic citizen science communities. PLOS ONE, 11(3), e0151387. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151387

11.

DeWaters

Powers

(2006, June). Improving science literacy through project based K 12 outreach efforts that use energy and environmental themes [Paper presentation]. 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, IL, United States. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2–158

12.

Edwards

Jones

C. B.

Perkins

S. E.

Corcoran

(2021). Passive citizen science: The role of social media in wildlife observations. PLOS ONE, 16(8), e0255416. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255416

13.

Friedman

D. P.

(2008). Public outreach: A scientific imperative. The Journal of Neuroscience, 28(46), 11743–11745. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.0005-08.2008

14.

Gagnon

N. L.

Komor

A. J.

(2017). Addressing an overlooked science outreach audience: Development of a science mentorship program focusing on critical thinking skills for adults working toward a high school equivalency degree. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(10), 1435–1442. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b01002

15.

Goldstein

C. M.

Murray

E. J.

Beard

Schnoes

A. M.

Wang

M. L.

(2021). Science communication in the age of misinformation. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 54(12), 985–990. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaaa088

16.

Greer

Alexander

Baldwin

T. O.

Freeze

H. H.

Thompson

Hunt

Snowflack

D. R.

(2018). The art of science communication—A novel approach to science communication training. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 19(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v19i1.1547

17.

Hassan

S.-U.

Iqbal

Aljohani

N. R.

Alelyani

Zuccala

(2020). Introducing the “alt-index” for measuring the social visibility of scientific research. Scientometrics, 123(3), 1407–1419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03447-z

18.

Jucan

M. S.

Jucan

C. N.

(2014). The power of science communication. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 149, 461–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.08.288

19.

Juncu

Livaudais

(2016). An analysis of the GPS R&D program as a case study illustrating DOD R&D and its associated successes to justfiy the continued investments into sustainment of DOD R7D budgets. https://calhoun.nps.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/ba4798da-fcc6-441a-95a6-20a929b12928/content

20.

Kahan

D. M.

Peters

Wittlin

Slovic

Ouellette

L. L.

Braman

Mandel

(2012). The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Climate Change, 2(10), 732–735.

21.

Kahn

MacGarvie

(2024). New evidence on international postdocs in the US: Less pay, different experiences. Research Policy, 53(9), 105077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2024.105077

22.

Kassab

(2019). Does public outreach impede research performance? Exploring the “researcher’s dilemma” in a sustainability research center. Science and Public Policy, 46(5), 710–720. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scz024

23.

The Lancet Infectious Diseases. (2020). The COVID-19 infodemic. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 20(8), 875. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30565-X

24.

McCann

B. M.

Cramer

C. B.

Taylor

L. G.

(2015). Assessing the impact of education and outreach activities on research scientists. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 19(1), 65–78.

25.

McClain

Neeley

(2015). A critical evaluation of science outreach via social media: Its role and impact on scientists [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research, 3, 300. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.5918.2

26.

Mondal

Parvanov

E. D.

Singla

R. K.

Rayan

R. A.

Nawaz

F. A.

Ritschl

Eibensteiner

Siva Sai

Cenanovic

Devkota

H. P.

Hribersek

Klager

Kletecka-Pulker

Völkl-Kernstock

Khalid

G. M.

Lordan

Găman

M.-A.

Shen

. . .Atanasov

A. G.

(2022). Twitter-based crowdsourcing: What kind of measures can help to end the COVID-19 pandemic faster? Frontiers in Medicine, 9, 961360. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.961360

27.

Mueller-Herbst

J. M.

Xenos

M. A.

Scheufele

D. A.

Brossard

(2020). Saw it on Facebook: The role of social media in facilitating science issue awareness. Social Media + Society, 6(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120930412

28.

Neuman

(2015, January 29). Scientists, general public have divergent views on science, report says. NPR. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2015/01/29/382464912/scientists-general-public-have-divergent-views-on-science-report-says#:~:text=Hourly%20News-,Scientists%2C%20General%20Public%20Have%20Divergent%20Views%20On%20Science%2C%20Report%20Says,climate%20change%20and%20human%20evolution

29.

NPR: Short Wave. (2020, September 7). 2020 Pint of Science festival will be virtual because of COVID-19. https://www.npr.org/2020/09/07/910399204/2020-pint-of-science-festival-will-be-virtual-because-of-covid-19

30.

NPR: WUSF BBC Newshour. (2015, May 18). Science and suds meet at sold-out “Pint of Science” events. https://www.wusf.org/university-beat/2015-05-18/science-and-suds-meet-at-sold-out-pint-of-science-events

31.

Özkent

(2022). Social media usage to share information in communication journals: An analysis of social media activity and article citations. PLOS ONE, 17(2), e0263725. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263725

32.

Paradis

Knoll

M. A.

Shah

Lambert

Delouya

Bahig

Taussky

(2020). Twitter: A platform for dissemination and discussion of scientific papers in radiation oncology. American Journal of Clinical Oncology, 43(6), 442–445. https://doi.org/10.1097/coc.0000000000000685

33.

Paul

Motskin

(2016). Engaging the public with your research. Trends in Immunology, 37(4), 268–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2016.02.007

34.

Pew Research Center. (2015). Public and scientists’ views on science and society. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2015/01/29/public-and-scientists-views-on-science-and-society/

35.

Pew Research Center. (2024). Public trust in scientists and views on their role in policymaking. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2024/11/14/public-trust-in-scientists-and-views-on-their-role-in-policymaking/

36.

Pint of Science U.S. (2025). Pint of Science U.S. about. https://pintofscience.us/about/

37.

Pint of Science U.K. (2022). Pint of Science: Creative reactions. https://pintofscience.co.uk/creativereactions/

38.

Ravinetto

Singh

J. A.

(2023). Responsible dissemination of health and medical research: Some guidance points. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, 28(3), 144–147. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2022-111967

39.

Richter

Thomas

(2018). Science in the eye of the beer-holder—How to put on an effective Pint of Science: The Adelaide experience. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 19(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v19i1.1539

40.

Robinson

M. T.

Jatupornpimol

Sachaphimukh

Lönnkvist

Ruecker

Cheah

P. Y.

(2017). The first Pint of Science festival in Asia. Science Communication, 39(6), 810–820. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547017739907

41.

Roche

Fairfield

J. A.

Gallagher

Á.

Bell

(2020). Bright club: Establishing a science comedy variety night in Ireland. Science Communication, 42(1), 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547019890347

42.

Rouzer

S. K.

Kalinowski

L. M.

Kaseda

E. T.

(2023). The importance of promoting scientific advocacy & outreach for trainees. Neuropsychopharmacology, 48(5), 713–715. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-023-01530-6

43.

Rust

N. C.

(2025). The unexpected value of communicating science to the public. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 26, 572–573.

44.

Saeed

Traub

Nicolas

Demartini

Papotti

(2022, October 17). Crowdsourced fact-checking at Twitter: How does the crowd compare with experts? [Conference session]. 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, Atlanta, GA, United States. https://doi.org/10.1145/3511808.3557279

45.

Scalice

Dolci

Brochu

Merriman

Davis

Billings

Voytek

M. A.

(2019). FameLab USA: Improving science communication skills for early career scientists. Astrobiology, 19(4), 614–623. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2017.1809

46.

Smith

Arbeit

C. A.

Thompson

Yamaner

M. I.

(2024). National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES): Graduate enrollment and postdoctoral appointments in science, engineering, and health rise, driven largely by increases in the number of women and temporary visa holders. U.S. National Science Foundation. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf25316

47.

Tuttle

M. J.

Cejas

Kang

Muchaamba

Goncarovs

Ozakman

Aziz

Orelle

(2023). Promoting science literacy and awareness across the globe: The role of scientists as science ambassadors. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 24(2), e00041–00023. https://doi.org/doi:10.1128/jmbe.00041-23

48.

UIC Today. (2014, May 15). Join UIC researchers in a Pint of Science at local tavern. https://today.uic.edu/join-uic-researchers-in-a-pint-of-science-at-local-tavern/

49.

United for Medical Research. (2025). NIH’S role in sustaining the U.S. economy. https://www.unitedformedicalresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/UMR_NIH-Role-in-Sustaining-US-Economy-FY2024-2025-Update.pdf

50.

U.S. National Science Foundation. (2025a). On the origins of Google. https://www.nsf.gov/news/origins-google

51.

U.S. National Science Foundation. (2025b). Pocket-sized progress: Smartphones and NSF innovations. https://www.nsf.gov/science-matters/pocket-sized-progress-smartphones-nsf-innovations

52.

Varner

(2014). Scientific outreach: Toward effective public engagement with biological science. BioScience, 64(4), 333–340. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biu021

53.

Woitowich

N. C.

Hunt

G. C.

Muhammad

L. N.

Garbarino

(2022). Assessing motivations and barriers to science outreach within academic science research settings: A mixed-methods survey. Frontiers in Communication, 7, 907762. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.907762