The authors propose formalizing an entity for the sciences and science communication that is akin to public art in the humanities: public science. Public science might be able to play a role in enhancing and supporting society’s relationship with science by embedding science content into everyday experiences. The authors examine one project and its potential impact in public science. From Earth to the Universe has placed astronomy images in “nontraditional” science communication venues such as parks and airports. From Earth to the Universe could serve as a model for a type of public science, an attempt to make science accessible to nonexperts in public spaces.
Arcand, K.K., & Watzke, M. ( 2010). Bringing the universe to the street: A preliminary look at informal learning implications for a large-scale non-traditional science outreach project. JCOM: Journal of Science Communication, 9, 1-13.
2.
Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A. W., & Feder, M. A. (Eds.). (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places and pursuits. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
3.
Cole, P.R., & Cutting, J.M. ( 1996). The inside story of science city: An outdoor public science exhibition. Curator: The Museum Journal, 39, 245-261.
4.
Crettaz von Roten, F. ( 2011). In search of a new public for scientific exhibitions or festivals: The track of casual visitors. JCOM: Journal of Science Communication, 10, 1-8.
5.
Diamond, S. ( 2008). Participation, flow, and the redistribution of authorship: The challenges of collaborative exchange and new media curatorial practice . In C. Paul (Ed.), New media in the white cube and beyond: Curatorial models for digital art (pp. 135-162). Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
Hooper-Greenhill, E. ( 2006). The power of museum pedagogy. In H. H. Genoways (Ed.), Museum philosophy for the twenty-first century (pp 235-245). Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.
7.
Krysa, J. ( 2008). Distributed curating and immateriality. In C. Paul (Ed.), New media in the white cube and beyond: Curatorial models for digital art (pp. 87-105). Berkeley : University of California Press.
8.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. ( 1993). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Lubowich, D. ( 2010). Music and astronomy under the stars. In J. Barnes, D. A. Smith , M. G. Gibbs, & J. G. Manning (Eds.), ASP conference series: Vol. 431. Science education and outreach: Forging a path to the future (pp. 47-53). San Francisco, CA: Astronomical Society of the Pacific .
10.
Norsted, B.A. ( 2010). Take me out to the ball game: Science outreach to non-traditional audiences. In J. Barnes, D. A. Smith, M. G. Gibbs, & J. G. Manning (Eds.), ASP conference series: Vol. 431. Science education and outreach: Forging a path to the future (pp. 170-173). San Francisco, CA: Astronomical Society of the Pacific.
11.
Riise, J. ( 2008). Bringing science to the public. In D. Cheng, M. Claessens , T. Gascoigne, J. Metcalfe, B. Schiele, & S. Shi (Eds.), Communicating science in social contexts (pp. 301-309). Brussels, Belgium: Springer.
12.
Russo, P., & Christensen, L. L. (Eds.). (2010). International Year of Astronomy 2009: Final report. Paris, France: International Astronomical Union. ISBN: 978-3-923524-65-5
13.
Smith, L., Smith, J.K., Arcand, K.K., Smith, R.K., Bookbinder, J., & Keach, K. ( 2011). Aesthetics and astronomy: Studying the public’s perception and understanding of imagery from space. Science Communication, 33, 201-238. doi:10.1177/1075547010379579
14.
Stafford, B.M. ( 1999). Artful science: Enlightenment entertainment and the eclipse of visual education. Cambridge: MIT Press.
