The rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has supercharged the proliferation of multimodal disinformation or so-called “deepfakes.” Through a two-wave online experiment among U.S. residents, we tested media literacy interventions that varied by message content (warning, technique tips, combined) and media format (text, infographic, video) on their effectiveness in combating deepfakes. Findings showed technique tips on how to identify deepfakes improved deepfake detection, perceived AI literacy, and self-efficacy, while the video format was most effective in elevating perceived AI literacy. One week later, the detection accuracies remained consistently high across the board, but perceived AI literacy and self-efficacy decreased in some conditions.
AhmedS.NgS. W. T.BeeA. W. T. (2023). Understanding the role of fear of missing out and deficient self-regulation in sharing of deepfakes on social media: Evidence from eight countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1127507. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1127507
2.
Allaire-DuquetteG.HasniA.DrouinJ. N.GroleauA.MahhouA.LegaultA.KhayatA.CarignanM.-E.Ayotte-BeaudetJ.-P. (2025). Primary school pupils’ ability to detect fake science news following a news media literacy intervention: Exploration of their success rate, evaluation strategies, self-efficacy beliefs, and views of science news. Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 5(2), Article e2509. https://doi.org/10.30935/jdet/15963
3.
AlonA. T.RahimiI. D.TaharH. (2025). The impact of presentation modalities on perceived accuracy and sharing of fake news: The tole of perceived diagnosticity and involvement. Online Information Review, 49, 955–973. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-07-2024-0445
4.
AppelM.PrietzelF. (2022). The detection of political deepfakes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 27(4), zmac008. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmac008
5.
ApukeO. D.OmarB.Asude TuncaE. (2022). Literacy concepts as an intervention strategy for improving fake news knowledge, detection skills, and curtailing the tendency to share fake news in Nigeria. Child & Youth Services, 44(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/0145935X.2021.2024758
6.
ArecharA. A.AllenJ.BerinskyA. J.ColeR.EpsteinZ.GarimellaK.GullyA.LuJ. G.RossR. M.StagnaroM. N.ZhangY.PennycookG.RandD. G. (2023). Understanding and combatting misinformation across 16 countries on six continents. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(9), 1502–1513. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01641-6
7.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman and Company.
BirrerA.JustN. (2024). What we know and don’t know about deepfakes: An investigation into the state of the research and regulatory landscape. New Media & Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241253138
10.
ChaikenS.TropeY. (Eds.). (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. Guilford Press.
11.
ClaytonK.BlairS.BusamJ. A.ForstnerS.GlanceJ.GreenG.KawataA.KovvuriA.MartinJ.MorganE.SandhuM.SangR.Scholz-BrightR.WelchA. T.WolffA. G.ZhouA.NyhanB. (2020). Real solutions for fake news? Measuring the effectiveness of general warnings and fact-check tags in reducing belief in false stories on social media. Political Behavior, 42, 1073–1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09533-0
12.
CrooksS. M.CheonJ.InanF.AriF.FloresR. (2012). Modality and cueing in multimedia learning: Examining cognitive and perceptual explanations for the modality effect. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1063–1071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.01.010
FordT. W.YankoskiM.FaccianiM.WeningerT. (2023). Online media literacy intervention in Indonesia reduces misinformation sharing intention. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 15(2), 99–123. https://doi.org/10.23860/JMLE-2023-15-2-8
16.
GrohM.EpsteinZ.FirestoneC.PicardR. (2022). Deepfake detection by human crowds, machines, and machine-informed crowds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(1), Article e2110013119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2110013119
17.
GuessA. M.LernerM.LyonsB.MontgomeryJ. M.NyhanB.ReiflerJ.SircarN. (2020). A digital media literacy intervention increases discernment between mainstream and false news in the United States and India. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(27), 15536–15545. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1920498117
18.
GwebuK. L.WangJ.ZiflaE. (2022). Can warnings curb the spread of fake news? The interplay between warning, trust and confirmation bias. Behaviour & Information Technology, 41(16), 3552–3573. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2021.2002932
19.
HameleersM. (2024). Is the alarm on deception ringing too loudly? The effects of different forms of misinformation warnings on risk perceptions of misinformation exposure. European Journal of Communication, 39(4), 360–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231241271015
20.
HoppT. (2022). Fake news self-efficacy, fake news identification, and content sharing on Facebook. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 19(2), 229–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2021.1962778
21.
HuangG.JiaW.YuW. (2024). Media literacy interventions improve resilience to misinformation: A meta-analytic investigation of overall effect and moderating factors. Communication Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502241288103
22.
HwangY.RyuJ. Y.JeongS.-H. (2021). Effects of disinformation using deepfake: The protective effect of media literacy education. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 24(3), 188–193. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0174
KuruO. (2025). Literacy training vs. psychological inoculation? Explicating and comparing the effects of predominantly informational and predominantly motivational interventions on the processing of health statistics. Journal of Communication, 75(1), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqae032
25.
LechelerS.KeerM.SchuckA. R. T.HänggliR. (2015). The effects of repetitive news framing on political opinions over time. Communication Monographs, 82(3), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2014.994646
26.
LehnertK.TillB. D.CarlsonB. D. (2013). Advertising creativity and repetition: Recall, wearout and wearin effects. International Journal of Advertising, 32(2), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJA-32-2-211-231
27.
LevineT. R. (2014). Truth-default theory (TDT): A theory of human deception and deception detection. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(4), 378–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X14535916
28.
LuC.HuB.BaoM.-M.WangC.BiC.JuX.-D. (2024). Can media literacy intervention improve fake news credibility assessment? A meta-analysis. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 27(4), 240–252. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2023.0324
29.
LuH.YuanS. (2024). “I know it’s a deepfake”: The role of AI disclaimers and comprehension in the processing of deepfake parodies. Journal of Communication, 74(5), 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqae022
30.
LuoM.HancockJ.MarkowitzD. (2022). Credibility perceptions and detection accuracy of fake news headlines on social media: Effects of truth-bias and endorsement cues. Communication Research, 49(2), 171–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220921321
31.
MaertensR.RoozenbeekJ.BasolM.van der LindenS. (2021). Long-term effectiveness of inoculation against misinformation: Three longitudinal experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 27(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000315
32.
MayerR. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
MolinaM. D.SundarS. S. (2019). Technological affordances can promote misinformation. In KatzJ. E.MaysK. K. (Eds.), Journalism and truth in an age of social media (pp. 182–197). Oxford University Press.
35.
O’KeefeD. J. (2003). Message properties, mediating states, and manipulation checks: Claims, evidence, and data analysis in experimental persuasive message effects research. Communication Theory, 13(3), 251–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00292.x
36.
PennycookG.EpsteinZ.MoslehM.ArecharA. A.EcklesD.RandD. G. (2021). Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online. Nature, 592, 590–595. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03344-2
37.
PotterW. J. (2004). Theory of media literacy: A cognitive approach. Sage.
QianS.ShenC.ZhangJ. (2022). Fighting cheapfakes: Using a digital media literacy intervention to motivate reverse search of out-of-context visual misinformation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 28(1), zmac024. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmac024
ScheibenzuberC.HoferS.NistorN. (2021). Designing for fake news literacy training: A problem-based undergraduate online-course. Computers in Human Behavior, 121, 106796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106796
42.
ShinJ.Chan-OlmstedS. (2022). User perceptions and trust of explainable machine learning fake news detectors. International Journal of Communication, 17, 518–540.
43.
SilverblattA.EliceiriE. M.EliceiriE. M. E. (1997). Dictionary of media literacy. Greenwood Publishing Group.
44.
SundarS. S.MolinaM. D.ChoE. (2021). Seeing is believing: Is video modality more powerful in spreading fake news via online messaging apps?Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 26(6), 301–319. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab010
TullyM.VragaE. K. (2018). A mixed methods approach to examining the relationship between news media literacy and political efficacy. International Journal of Communication, 12, 766–787.
47.
VaccariC.ChadwickA. (2020). Deepfakes and disinformation: Exploring the impact of synthetic political video on deception, uncertainty, and trust in news. Social Media + Society, 6(1), 2056305120903408. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120903408
48.
Van MerriënboerJ. J. G.SwellerJ. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 147–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-005-3951-0
49.
VragaE. K.BodeL.TullyM. (2022). The effects of a news literacy video and real-time corrections to video misinformation related to sunscreen and skin cancer. . Health Communication, 37(13), 1622–1630. http://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1910165
50.
WangB.RauP.-L. P.YuanT. (2023). Measuring user competence in using artificial intelligence: Validity and reliability of artificial intelligence literacy scale. Behaviour & Information Technology, 42(9), 1324–1337. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2022.2072768
51.
WeikmannT.GreberH.NikolaouA. (2025). After deception: How falling for a deepfake affects the way we see, hear, and experience media. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 30(1), 187–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612241233539
52.
ZhangL.IyendoT. O.ApukeO. D.GeverC. V. (2025). Experimenting the effect of using visual multimedia intervention to inculcate social media literacy skills to tackle fake news. Journal of Information Science, 51, 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515221131797
53.
ZhangX.KoM.CarpenterD. (2016). Development of a scale to measure skepticism toward electronic word-of-mouth. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.042
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
