“A Warning is Not Enough. Teach Me How to Spot Deepfakes.”: Testing Media Literacy Interventions for Combating Deepfakes

Abstract

The rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has supercharged the proliferation of multimodal disinformation or so-called “deepfakes.” Through a two-wave online experiment among U.S. residents, we tested media literacy interventions that varied by message content (warning, technique tips, combined) and media format (text, infographic, video) on their effectiveness in combating deepfakes. Findings showed technique tips on how to identify deepfakes improved deepfake detection, perceived AI literacy, and self-efficacy, while the video format was most effective in elevating perceived AI literacy. One week later, the detection accuracies remained consistently high across the board, but perceived AI literacy and self-efficacy decreased in some conditions.

Keywords

deepfakes disinformation literacy intervention warning

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahmed

S. W. T.

Bee

A. W. T.

(2023). Understanding the role of fear of missing out and deficient self-regulation in sharing of deepfakes on social media: Evidence from eight countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1127507. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1127507

Allaire-Duquette

Hasni

Drouin

J. N.

Groleau

Mahhou

Legault

Khayat

Carignan

M.-E.

Ayotte-Beaudet

J.-P.

(2025). Primary school pupils’ ability to detect fake science news following a news media literacy intervention: Exploration of their success rate, evaluation strategies, self-efficacy beliefs, and views of science news. Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 5(2), Article e2509. https://doi.org/10.30935/jdet/15963

Alon

A. T.

Rahimi

I. D.

Tahar

(2025). The impact of presentation modalities on perceived accuracy and sharing of fake news: The tole of perceived diagnosticity and involvement. Online Information Review, 49, 955–973. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-07-2024-0445

Appel

Prietzel

(2022). The detection of political deepfakes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 27(4), zmac008. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmac008

Apuke

O. D.

Omar

Asude Tunca

(2022). Literacy concepts as an intervention strategy for improving fake news knowledge, detection skills, and curtailing the tendency to share fake news in Nigeria. Child & Youth Services, 44(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/0145935X.2021.2024758

Arechar

A. A.

Allen

Berinsky

A. J.

Cole

Epstein

Garimella

Gully

J. G.

Ross

R. M.

Stagnaro

M. N.

Zhang

Pennycook

Rand

D. G.

(2023). Understanding and combatting misinformation across 16 countries on six continents. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(9), 1502–1513. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01641-6

Bandura

(1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman and Company.

Beaumont

(2024, June 19). “A lack of trust”: How deepfakes and AI could rattle the US elections. Al Jazeera. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/6/19/a-lack-of-trust-how-deepfakes-and-ai-could-rattle-the-us-elections

Birrer

Just

(2024). What we know and don’t know about deepfakes: An investigation into the state of the research and regulatory landscape. New Media & Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241253138

10.

Chaiken

Trope

(Eds.). (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. Guilford Press.

11.

Clayton

Blair

Busam

J. A.

Forstner

Glance

Green

Kawata

Kovvuri

Martin

Morgan

Sandhu

Sang

Scholz-Bright

Welch

A. T.

Wolff

A. G.

Zhou

Nyhan

(2020). Real solutions for fake news? Measuring the effectiveness of general warnings and fact-check tags in reducing belief in false stories on social media. Political Behavior, 42, 1073–1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09533-0

12.

Crooks

S. M.

Cheon

Inan

Ari

Flores

(2012). Modality and cueing in multimedia learning: Examining cognitive and perceptual explanations for the modality effect. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1063–1071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.01.010

13.

Doss

Mondschein

Shu

Wolfson

Kopecky

Fitton-Kane

V. A.

Bush

Tucker

(2023). Deepfakes and scientific knowledge dissemination. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 13429. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39944-3

14.

Erduran

(2024). Deepfakes and students’ deep learning: A harmonious pair in science. Science, 385(6712), eadr8354. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adr8354

15.

Ford

T. W.

Yankoski

Facciani

Weninger

(2023). Online media literacy intervention in Indonesia reduces misinformation sharing intention. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 15(2), 99–123. https://doi.org/10.23860/JMLE-2023-15-2-8

16.

Groh

Epstein

Firestone

Picard

(2022). Deepfake detection by human crowds, machines, and machine-informed crowds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(1), Article e2110013119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2110013119

17.

Guess

A. M.

Lerner

Lyons

Montgomery

J. M.

Nyhan

Reifler

Sircar

(2020). A digital media literacy intervention increases discernment between mainstream and false news in the United States and India. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(27), 15536–15545. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1920498117

18.

Gwebu

K. L.

Wang

Zifla

(2022). Can warnings curb the spread of fake news? The interplay between warning, trust and confirmation bias. Behaviour & Information Technology, 41(16), 3552–3573. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2021.2002932

19.

Hameleers

(2024). Is the alarm on deception ringing too loudly? The effects of different forms of misinformation warnings on risk perceptions of misinformation exposure. European Journal of Communication, 39(4), 360–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231241271015

20.

Hopp

(2022). Fake news self-efficacy, fake news identification, and content sharing on Facebook. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 19(2), 229–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2021.1962778

21.

Huang

Jia

(2024). Media literacy interventions improve resilience to misinformation: A meta-analytic investigation of overall effect and moderating factors. Communication Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502241288103

22.

Hwang

Ryu

J. Y.

Jeong

S.-H.

(2021). Effects of disinformation using deepfake: The protective effect of media literacy education. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 24(3), 188–193. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0174

23.

Johnson

(2023). What are deepfakes? How fake AI-powered audio and video warps our perception of reality. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/guides/tech/what-is-deepfake

24.

Kuru

(2025). Literacy training vs. psychological inoculation? Explicating and comparing the effects of predominantly informational and predominantly motivational interventions on the processing of health statistics. Journal of Communication, 75(1), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqae032

25.

Lecheler

Keer

Schuck

A. R. T.

Hänggli

(2015). The effects of repetitive news framing on political opinions over time. Communication Monographs, 82(3), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2014.994646

26.

Lehnert

Till

B. D.

Carlson

B. D.

(2013). Advertising creativity and repetition: Recall, wearout and wearin effects. International Journal of Advertising, 32(2), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJA-32-2-211-231

27.

Levine

T. R.

(2014). Truth-default theory (TDT): A theory of human deception and deception detection. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(4), 378–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X14535916

28.

Bao

M.-M.

Wang

X.-D.

(2024). Can media literacy intervention improve fake news credibility assessment? A meta-analysis. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 27(4), 240–252. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2023.0324

29.

Yuan

(2024). “I know it’s a deepfake”: The role of AI disclaimers and comprehension in the processing of deepfake parodies. Journal of Communication, 74(5), 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqae022

30.

Luo

Hancock

Markowitz

(2022). Credibility perceptions and detection accuracy of fake news headlines on social media: Effects of truth-bias and endorsement cues. Communication Research, 49(2), 171–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220921321

31.

Maertens

Roozenbeek

Basol

van der Linden

(2021). Long-term effectiveness of inoculation against misinformation: Three longitudinal experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 27(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000315

32.

Mayer

R. E.

(2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

33.

MIT Media Lab. (n.d.). Detect DeepFakes: How to counteract misinformation created by AI. MIT Media Lab. https://www.media.mit.edu/projects/detect-fakes/overview/

34.

Molina

M. D.

Sundar

S. S.

(2019). Technological affordances can promote misinformation. In Katz

J. E.

Mays

K. K.

(Eds.), Journalism and truth in an age of social media (pp. 182–197). Oxford University Press.

35.

O’Keefe

D. J.

(2003). Message properties, mediating states, and manipulation checks: Claims, evidence, and data analysis in experimental persuasive message effects research. Communication Theory, 13(3), 251–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00292.x

36.

Pennycook

Epstein

Mosleh

Arechar

A. A.

Eckles

Rand

D. G.

(2021). Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online. Nature, 592, 590–595. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03344-2

37.

Potter

W. J.

(2004). Theory of media literacy: A cognitive approach. Sage.

38.

Purdue University. (n.d.). Scientific news literacy. Purdue Libraries. https://guides.lib.purdue.edu/c.php?g=986194&p=7132183

39.

Qian

Shen

Zhang

(2022). Fighting cheapfakes: Using a digital media literacy intervention to motivate reverse search of out-of-context visual misinformation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 28(1), zmac024. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmac024

40.

Sample

(2020, January 13). What are deepfakes—and how can you spot them? The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/jan/13/what-are-deepfakes-and-how-can-you-spot-them

41.

Scheibenzuber

Hofer

Nistor

(2021). Designing for fake news literacy training: A problem-based undergraduate online-course. Computers in Human Behavior, 121, 106796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106796

42.

Shin

Chan-Olmsted

(2022). User perceptions and trust of explainable machine learning fake news detectors. International Journal of Communication, 17, 518–540.

43.

Silverblatt

Eliceiri

E. M.

Eliceiri

E. M. E.

(1997). Dictionary of media literacy. Greenwood Publishing Group.

44.

Sundar

S. S.

Molina

M. D.

Cho

(2021). Seeing is believing: Is video modality more powerful in spreading fake news via online messaging apps? Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 26(6), 301–319. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab010

45.

Torkington

(2024, January 13). These are the 3 biggest emerging risks the world is facing. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/01/ai-disinformation-global-risks/

46.

Tully

Vraga

E. K.

(2018). A mixed methods approach to examining the relationship between news media literacy and political efficacy. International Journal of Communication, 12, 766–787.

47.

Vaccari

Chadwick

(2020). Deepfakes and disinformation: Exploring the impact of synthetic political video on deception, uncertainty, and trust in news. Social Media + Society, 6(1), 2056305120903408. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120903408

48.

Van Merriënboer

J. J. G.

Sweller

. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 147–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-005-3951-0

49.

Vraga

E. K.

Bode

Tully

(2022). The effects of a news literacy video and real-time corrections to video misinformation related to sunscreen and skin cancer. . Health Communication, 37(13), 1622–1630. http://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1910165

50.

Wang

Rau

P.-L. P.

Yuan

(2023). Measuring user competence in using artificial intelligence: Validity and reliability of artificial intelligence literacy scale. Behaviour & Information Technology, 42(9), 1324–1337. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2022.2072768

51.

Weikmann

Greber

Nikolaou

(2025). After deception: How falling for a deepfake affects the way we see, hear, and experience media. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 30(1), 187–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612241233539

52.

Zhang

Iyendo

T. O.

Apuke

O. D.

Gever

C. V.

(2025). Experimenting the effect of using visual multimedia intervention to inculcate social media literacy skills to tackle fake news. Journal of Information Science, 51, 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515221131797

53.

Zhang

Carpenter

(2016). Development of a scale to measure skepticism toward electronic word-of-mouth. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.042

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

5.88 MB