The digital age creates new challenges for journalists and science communicators that threaten to undermine their shared goals of providing trustworthy content to audiences. To tackle 21st Century problems such as misinformation, falls in public trust and the diversity of online sources, the traditional models of journalism and sci-comm need to adapt, expanding their approaches and ethics to a new information environment.
BrossardDLewensteinB (2010) A critical appraisal of models of public understanding of science: Using practice to inform theory. In: KahlorLStoutP (eds) Communicating Science: New Agendas in Communication. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 11–39.
DixonGNClarkeCE (2013) Heightening uncertainty around certain science: Media coverage, false balance, and the autism-vaccine controversy. Science Communication35(3): 358–382.
11.
DunwoodyS (2016) Science journalism. In: BucchiMTrenchB (eds) Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 27–39.
12.
FreelonDWellsC (2020) Disinformation as political communication. Political Communication37: 145–146.
13.
GrimmJ (2009) ‘Teach the controversy’: The relationship between sources and frames in reporting the intelligent design debate. Science Communication31(2): 167–186.
LutkinC (2014) The Top Ten Scientific Problems with Biological and Chemical Evolution. Leicester: Chartwell Press.
19.
MarasS (2013) Objectivity in Journalism. New York, NY: Wiley.
20.
MarwickAEboydd (2011) I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society13(1): 114–133.
21.
OreskesNConwayEM (2010) Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Press.
