To understand public perceptions of pandemic messaging, we surveyed U.S. adults for 36 consecutive weeks starting on March 12, 2020. Using a repeated cross-section design, we tracked intentions to engage in protective behaviors, demographics, and four message perceptions: exhaustion, overload, repetition, and exaggeration. Exhaustion increased over time and became negatively related to intentions (rising negativity model). Exaggeration was stable across the 36 weeks, yet had the strongest negative relationship with intentions and that relationship increased over time (fixed model with increasing negative relationship). Overload and repetition were positively related to intentions, but the relationships faded over time (fading positivity model).
BalaR.SrivastavaA.NingthougjamG. D.PotsangbamT.OinamA.AnalC. L. (2021). An observational study in Manipur State, India on preventive behavior influenced by social media during the COVID-19 pandemic mediated by cyberchondria and information overload. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, 54(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.20.465
2.
BallH.WozniakT. R. (2022). Why do some Americans resist COVID-19 prevention behavior? An analysis of issue importance, message fatigue, and reactance during COVID-19 messaging. Health Communication, 37, 1812–1819. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1920717
3.
BavelJ. J. V.BaickerK.BoggioP. S.CapraroV.CichockaA.CikaraM.CrockettM. J.CrumA. J.DouglasK. M.DruckmanJ. N.DruryJ.DubeO.EllemersN.FinkelE. J.FowlerJ. H.GelfandM.HanS.HaslamS. A.JettenJ.KitayamaS.. . .WillerR. (2020). (2020). Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behavior, 4, 460–447. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z
4.
BreytonM.SchultzE.SmithA.RouquetteA.ManciniJ. (2023). Information overload in the context of COVID-19 pandemic: A repeated cross-sectional study. Patient Education and Counseling, 110, 107672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2023.107672
5.
BreytonM.SmithA. B.RouquetteA.ManciniJ. (2020). Cancer information overload: Association between a brief version of the CIO scale and multiple cancer risk management behaviors. Patient Education & Counseling, 104(5), 1246–1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.09.016
6.
CalvilloD. P.RossB. J.GarciaR. J. B.SmelterT. J.RutchickA. M. (2020). Political ideology predicts perceptions of the threat of COVID-19 (and susceptibility to fake news about it). Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(8), 1119–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620940539
ChaeJ.LeeC. J.JensenJ. D. (2016). Correlates of cancer information overload: Focusing on individual ability and motivation. Health Communication, 31(5), 626–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.986026
9.
CinelliM.QuattrociocchiW.GaleazziA.ValensiseC. M.BrugnoliE.SchmidtA. L.ZolaP.ZolloF.ScalaA. (2020). The COVID-19 social media infodemic. Scientific Reports, 10, 16598. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73510-5
10.
CollinsL. M. (2006). Analysis of longitudinal data: The integration of theoretical model, temporal design, and statistical model. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 505–528. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190146
11.
COVID States Project. (2020). The state of the nation: A 50-state COVID-19 survey. The COVID States project. https://covidstates.org
12.
CummingsC. (2017). Cross-sectional design. In AllenM. (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of communication research methods (pp. 314–317). Sage.
13.
DeVellisR. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.
14.
DillardJ. P.ShenL. J. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72, 144–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750500111815
15.
Finney RuttenL. J.BlakeK. D.SkolnickV. G.DavisT.MoserR. P.HesseB. W. (2020). Data resource profile: The national cancer institute’s health information national trends survey (HINTS). International Journal of Epidemiology, 49(1), 17–17j. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyz083
16.
FinsetA.BosworthH.ButowP.GulbrandsenP.HulsmanR. L.PieterseA. H.StreetR.TschoetschelR.van WeertJ. (2020). Effective health communication—A key factor in fighting the COVID-19 pandemic. Patient Education & Counseling, 103(5), 873–876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.03.027
17.
FrewP. M.WilliamsV. A.ShapiroE. T.SanchezT.RosenbergE. S.FenimoreV. L.SullivanP. S. (2013). From (un)willingness to involvement: Development of a successful study brand for recruitment of diverse MSM to a longitudinal HIV research. International Journal of Population Research, 2013, 1–9.
GardikiotisA.MalinakiE.Charisiadis-TsitlakidisC.ProtonotariouA.ArchontisS.LampropoulouA.MarakiI.PapatheodorouK.ZafeiriouG. (2021). Emotional and cognitive responses to COVID-19 information overload under lockdown predict media attention and risk perceptions of COVID-19. Journal of Health Communication, 26(6), 434–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2021.1949649
20.
GrossB. M. (1964). The managing of organizations: The administrative struggle. The Free Press of Glencoe.
21.
GuanM.LiY.ScolesJ. D.ZhuY. (2023). COVID-19 message fatigue: How does it predictive preventive behavioral intentions and what types of information are people tired of hearing about?Health Communication, 38(8), 1631–1640. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.2023385
22.
GuoN.ZhaoS. Z.WengX.WuY.LukT. T.WongJ. Y. H.LamT. H.WangM. P. (2021). Associations of COVID-19 online information sources and information overload with psychological distress symptoms: A population-based study. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 11, 1330–1338. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibab086
23.
HongH.KimH. J. (2020). Antecedents and consequences of information overload in the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(24), 9305. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249305
24.
HonigsbaumM. (2020). The pandemic century: A history of global contagion from the Spanish flue to COVID-19. WH Allen.
25.
HopwoodC. J.BleidornW.WrightA. G. C. (2022). Connecting theory to methods in longitudinal research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(3), 884–894. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211008407
26.
HornikR.KikutA.JeschE.WokoC.SiegelL.KimK. (2021). Association of COVID-19 misinformation with face mask wearing and social distancing in a nationally representative US sample. Health Communication, 36(1), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1847437
27.
HsiangS.AllenD.Annan-PhanS.BellK.BolligerI.ChongT.DruckenmillerH.HuangL. Y.HultgrenA.KrasovichE.LauP.LeeJ.RolfE.TsengJ.WuT. (2020). The effect of large-scale anti-contagion policies on the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature, 584, 262–267. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2404-8
28.
HuangQ.MaoB.JiaX.PengW. (2023). COVID-19 information overload mediated the effects of cross-channel information differences on health information elaboration. Journal of Health Communication, 28(7), 401–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2023.2217097
29.
HwangY.SoJ.JeongS. (2023). Does COVID-19 message fatigue lead to misinformation acceptance? An extension of the risk information seeking and processing model. Health Communication, 38(12), 2742–2749. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2022.2111636
JensenJ. D. (2008). Scientific uncertainty in news coverage of cancer research: Effects of uncertainty on scientists’ and journalists’ credibility. Human Communication Research, 34(3), 347–369.
32.
JensenJ. D.BernatJ. K.WilsonK.GoonwardeneJ. (2011). The delay hypothesis: The manifestation of media effects over time. Human Communication Research, 37, 509–528.
33.
JensenJ. D.CarcioppoloN.KingA. J.ScherrC. L.JonesC. L.NiederdeppeJ. (2014). The cancer information overload (CIO) scale: Establishing predictive and discriminant validity. Patient Education & Counseling, 94(1), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.09.016
34.
JensenJ. D.PokharelM.CarcioppoloN.UpshawS.JohnK. K.KatzR. A. (2020). Cancer information overload: Discriminant validity and relationship to sun safe behavior. Patient Education & Counseling, 103(2), 309–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2019.08.039
35.
JensenJ. D.PokharelM.ScherrC. L.KingA. J.BrownN.JonesC. (2017). Communicating uncertainty to the public: How amount and source of uncertainty impact fatalism, backlash, and overload. Risk Analysis, 37(1), 40–51.
36.
JiaX.AhnS.CarcioppoloN. (2023). Measuring information overload and message fatigue toward COVID-19 prevention messages in USA and China. Health Promotion International, 38(3), daac003. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daac003
37.
JonesC. L.JensenJ. D.ScherrC. L.BrownN. R.ChristyK.WeaverJ. (2015). The health belief model as an explanatory framework in communication research: Exploring parallel, serial, and moderated mediation. Health Communication, 30(6), 566–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2013.873363
38.
KearneyM. D.ChiangS. C.MasseyP. M. (2020). The Twitter origins and evolution of the COVID-19 “plandemic” conspiracy theory. Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) Misinformation Review, 1(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/PN7UPO
39.
KenskiK.GottfriedJ. A.JamiesonK. H. (2011). The rolling cross-section: Design and utility for political research. In BucyE. P.HolbertR. L. (Eds.), The sourcebook for political communication research (pp. 34–54). Routledge.
40.
KhaleelI.WimmerB. C.PetersonG. M.ZaidiS. T. R.RoehrerE.CummingsE.LeeK. (2019). Health information overload among health consumers: A scoping review. Patient Education & Counseling, 103(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2019.08.008
41.
KimK.LustriaM. L. A.BurkeD.KwonN. (2007). Predictors of cancer information overload: Findings from a national survey. Information Research, 12. InformationR.net/ir/12-4/paper326.html
42.
KinnickK.KrugmanD. M.CameronG. T. (1996). Compassion fatigue: Communication and burnout toward social problems. Journalism Quarterly, 73, 687–707.
43.
KittelB.KritzingerS.BoomgaardenH.PrainsackB.EberlJ. M.KalleitnerF.LeberneggN. S.PartheymüllerJ.PlesciaC.SchiestlD. W.SchloglL. (2021). The Austrian Corona Panel Project: Monitoring individual and societal dynamics amidst the COVID-19 crisis. European Political Science, 20, 318–344. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-020-00294-7
44.
KochT.ZerbackT. (2013). Helpful or harmful? How frequent repetition affects perceived statement credibility, Journal of Communication, 63(6), 9931010. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12063
45.
KoffmanJ.GrossJ.EtkindS. N.SelmanL. (2020). Uncertainty and COVID-19: How are we to respond?Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 113(6), 211–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/014076820930665
46.
KohK.-K.ChanL. L.TanE.-K. (2020). Messaging fatigue and desensitisation to information during pandemic. Archives of Medical Research, 51(7), 716–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2020.06.014
LeboM. J.WeberC. (2015). An effective approach to the repeated cross-sectional design. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 242–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12095
49.
LiaoH.-P.PanX.-F.YinX.-Q.LiuY.-F.LiJ.-Y.WangJ.-L. (2022). Decreased COVID-related adaptive behavior and increased negative affect: A multivariate latent growth curve model. Journal of Health Psychology, 27, 2115–2128. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F13591053211021651
50.
LillieH.PokharelM.BergstromM. J.JensenJ. D. (2021). Perspective change in a time of crisis: The emotion and critical reflection model. In O’HairD.O’HairM. J. (Eds.), Communicating science in times of crisis: Coronavirus (pp. 242–261). Wiley.
51.
LiuH.LiuW.YoganathanV.OsburgV. (2021). COVID-19 information overload and generation Z’s social media discontinuance intention during the pandemic lockdown. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, 120600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120600
52.
MaleckiK. M. C.KeatingJ. A.SafdarN. (2021). Crisis communication and public perception of COVID-19 risk in the era of social media. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 72(4), 697–702. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa758
53.
MaoB.JiaX.HuangQ. (2024). How do information overload and message fatigue reduce information processing in the era of COVID-19? An ability–motivation approach. Journal of Information Science, 50(5), 1242–1254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551522111804
54.
MenardS. (2008). Handbook of longitudinal research: Design, measurement, and analysis. Academic Press.
MohammedM.Sha’abanA.JatauA. I.YunusaI.IsaA. M.WadaA. S.ObamiroK.ZainalH.IbrahimB. (2022). Assessment of COVID-10 information overload among the general public. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 9, 184–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-020-00942-0
NelsonD.KrepsG.HesseB.CroyleR. T.WillisG.AroraN. K.RimerB. K.ViswanathK. V.WeinsteinN.AldenS. (2004). The Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS): Development, design, and dissemination. Journal of Health Communication, 9(5), 443–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730490504233
NiederdeppeJ.Gurmankin LevyA. (2007). Fatalistic beliefs about cancer prevention and three prevention behaviors. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers, & Prevention, 16, 998–1002. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-06-0608
61.
ObamiroK.LeeK. (2019). Information overload in patients with atrial fibrillation: Can the cancer information overload (CIO) scale be used?Patient Education & Counseling, 102(3), 550–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2018.10.005
62.
OccaA.MorganS. E.PengW.MaoB.McFarlaneS. J.GrinfederK.ByrneM. (2020). Untangling interactivity’s effects: The role of cognitive absorption, perceived visual informativeness, and cancer information overload. Patient Education & Counseling, 104(5), 1059–1065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.10.007
63.
PooleM. S.Van de VenA. H.DooleyK. J.HolmesM. E. (2000). Organizational change and innovation processes: Theory and methods for research. Oxford University Press.
64.
RamírezA. S.Arellano CarmonaK. (2018). Beyond fatalism: Information overload as a mechanism to understand health disparities. Social Science & Medicine, 219, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.10.006
65.
RamondtS.RamírezA. S. (2019). Assessing the impact of the public nutrition information environment: Adapting the cancer information overload scale to measure diet information overload. Patient Education & Counseling, 102(1), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2018.07.020
66.
RatcliffC. L. (2021). Characterizing reactance in communication research: A review of conceptual and operational approaches. Communication Research, 48, 1033–1058. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0093650219872126
67.
RatcliffC. L.JensenJ. D.ScherrC. L.KrakowM.CrossleyK. (2019). Loss/gain framing, dose, and reactance: A message experiment. Risk Analysis, 39(12), 2640–2652.
68.
RatcliffC. L.WongB.JensenJ. D.KaphingstK. A. (2021). The impact of communicating uncertainty on public responses to precision medicine research. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 55(11), 1048–1061.
RomerD.JamiesonK. H. (2020). Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of COVID-19 in the U.S. Social Science & Medicine, 263, 113356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113356
71.
SarkhelS.BakhlaA. K.PraharajS. K.GhosalM. K. (2020). Information overload regarding COVID-19: Adaptation and validation of the cancer information overload scale. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 62, 481–487. https://doi.org/10.4103%2Fpsychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_974_20
SoJ. (2013). A further extension of the extended parallel process model (E-EPPM): Implications of cognitive appraisal theory of emotion and dispositional coping style. Health Communication, 28(1), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2012.708633
74.
SoJ.KimS.CohenH. (2017). Message fatigue: Conceptual definition, operationalization, and correlates. Communication Monographs, 84(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2016.1250429
75.
SoroyaS. H.FarooqA.MahmoodK.IsoahoJ.ZaraS. (2021). From information seeking to information avoidance: Understanding the health information behavior during a global health crisis. Information Processing & Management, 58(2), 102440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102440
76.
StephensK. K.MandhanaD. M.KimJ. J.LiX.GlowackiE. M.CruzI. (2017). Reconceptualizing communication overload and building a theoretical foundation. Communication Theory, 27(3), 269–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12116
77.
StephensK. K.RainsS. A. (2011). Information and communication technology sequences and message repetition in interpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 38, 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210362679
78.
SuttonJ.RenshawS. L.ButtsC. T. (2020). The first 60 days: American public health agencies’ social media strategies in the emerging COVID-19 pandemic. Health Security, 18(6), 454–461. https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2020.0105
ThompsonC. M.LinH.ParsloeS. (2018). Misrepresenting health conditions through fabrication and exaggeration: An adaption and replication of the false alarm effect. Health Communication, 33(5), 562–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1283563
WellsC.ShahD.PevehouseJ.FoleyJ.LukitoJ.PelledA.YangJ. (2019). The temporal turn in communication research: Time series analyses using computational approaches. International Journal of Communication, 13, 23. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/10635
84.
WickensC. D. (1974). Temporal limits of human information processing: A developmental study. Psychological Bulletin, 81(11), 739–755. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037250
XuX.LinC. A.ChenH. (2023). Exploring COVID-19 vaccine misinformation exposure, beliefs, fear, and information avoidance via the Stimulus–Organism–Response Framework. Science Communication, 45, 824–850. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470231207611
87.
ZimmermannB. M. (2024). Swiss residents’ information behavior perceptions during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal qualitative study. Social Science & Medicine, 344, 116647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116647
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
