The Risk Information-Seeking and Processing (RISP) model postulates that individuals who process risk information systematically are likely to hold stronger attitudes toward preventive behavior than those who process information heuristically. Therefore, individuals’ attitudes toward risk preventive behavior developed or changed through systematic processing are likely to be more persistent over time than those whose attitudes are based on heuristic processing. To examine this proposition, we conducted to a two-wave panel study in Hong Kong during the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings supported the proposition that processing influenced attitude strength, which influenced individuals’ attitude toward behavior a year later. Theoretical and practical implications were discussed.
AbelsonR. (1991). The case for measuring attitude strength in surveys. In TanurJ. (Ed.), Question about survey questions (pp. 177–203). Russell Sage Foundation.
2.
AbelsonR. (1995). Attitude extremity. In PettyR. E.KrosnickJ. A. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 25–42). Lawrence Erlbaum.
AjzenI.KruglanskiA. (2019). Reasoned action in the service of goal pursuit. Psychological Review, 126(5), 774–786. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000155
5.
AjzenI.SextonJ. (1999). Depth of processing, belief congruence, and attitude-behavior correspondence. In ChaikenS.TropeY. (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 117–138). Guilford.
6.
AlamodiA. A.Al-KattanK.ShareefM. A. (2021). The current global perspective of the knowledge-attitude-behavior of the general public towards the coronavirus disease-19 pandemic: Systematic review and meta-analysis on 67, 143 participants. PLOS ONE, 16(12). Article e0260240. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260240
BardenJ.TormalaZ. (2014). Elaboration and attitude strength: The new meta-cognitive perspective. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12078
DanceyC. P.ReidyJ. (2020). Statistics without maths for psychology (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
12.
DongX.GriffinR. J.YangJ.DunwoodyS. (2024). Risk information seeking and processing model. In SellnowT.SellnowD. (Eds.), Communicating risk and safety (pp. 413–452). De Gruyter.
13.
EaglyA. H.ChaikenS. (1993). The Psychology of Attitudes. Harcourt Brace.
14.
FishbeinM.AjzenI. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Psychology Press.
15.
FungT. K. F.GriffinR.DunwoodyS. (2018). Testing Links Among Uncertainty, Affect and Attitude Toward a Health Behavior in a Risky Setting. Science Communication, 40(1), 33–62. https://doi.org/10.3747/pdi.2016.00094
16.
GriffinR. J.DunwoodyS.NeuwirthK. (1999). Proposed model of the relationship of risk information seeking and processing to the development of preventive behaviors. Environmental Research, 80(2), S230–S245. https://doi.org/10.1006/enrs.1998.3940
17.
GriffinR. J.DunwoodyS.YangZ. J. (2013). Linking risk messages to information seeking and processing. In SalmonC. T. (Ed.), Communication yearbook36 (pp. 323–362). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2013.11679138/
18.
GriffinR. J.NeuwirthK.GieseJ.DunwoodyS. (2002). Linking the heuristic-systematic model and depth of processing. Communication Research, 29(6), 705–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365002237833
19.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
20.
HwangY.JeongS. (2023). Misinformation exposure and acceptance: The role of information seeking and processing. Health Communication, 38(3), 585–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1964187
21.
KimJ. H.KwokK. O.HuangZ.WongS. Y. S.ChanE. Y. Y. (2023). A longitudinal study of COVID-19 preventive behavior fatigue in Hong Kong: A city with previous pandemic experience. BMC Public Health, 23, Article 618. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15257-y
22.
KrosnickJ.PettyR. (1995). Attitude strength: An overview. In PettyR. E.KrosnickJ. A. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 1–24). Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
KrosnickJ. A.AbelsonR. P. (1991). Measures of attitude strength. In TanurJ. (Ed.), Questions about survey questions (pp. 177–203). Sage.
24.
KrosnickJ. A.SmithW. A. (1994). Attitude strength. In RamachandranV. S. (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of human behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 279–289). Academic Press.
25.
LedgerwoodA.CallahanS. P.ChaikenS. (2014). Changing minds: Persuasion in negotiation and conflict resolution. In DeutschM.ColemanP. T.MarcusE. C. (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (3rd ed., pp. 533–557). Jossey-Bass.
MatusK.SharifN.LiA.CaiZ.LeeW.SongM. (2023). From SARS to COVID-19: The role of experience and experts in Hong Kong’s initial policy response to an emerging pandemic. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01467-z
OuM.HoS. (2022). A Meta-Analysis of Factors Related to Health Information Seeking: An Integration from Six Theoretical Frameworks. Communication Research, 49(4), 567–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502211043024
31.
PearceK. (2020). What is social distancing and how can it slow the spread of COVID-19?Johns Hopkins University.
32.
PettyR.HaugtvedtC.SmithS. (1995). Elaboration as a determinant of attitude strength: Creating attitudes that are persistent, resistant, and predictive of behavior. In PettyR. E.KrosnickJ. A. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and Consequences (pp. 93–130). Lawrence Erlbaum.
33.
PettyR. E.BardemJ.WheelerS. C. (2009). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion: Developing health promotions for sustained behavioral change. In DiClementeR. J.CrosbyR. A.KeglerM. (Eds.), Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research (2nd ed., pp. 1–35). Jossey-Bass.
34.
SchlüterE.DavidovE.SchmidtP. (2006). The dynamics of authoritarianism and anomia: Applying autoregressive cross-lagged and latent growth models to a three-wave panel study. In MontfortK.OudH.SatorraA. (Eds.), Longitudinal models in the behavioral and related sciences (pp. 315–336). Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
TesserA.MartinL.MendoliaM. (1995). The impact of thought on attitude extremity and attitude-behavior consistency. In PettyR. E.KrosnickJ. A. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 73–92). Lawrence Erlbaum.
36.
TormalaZ.RuckerD. (2007). Attitude certainty: A review of past findings and emerging perspectives. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 469–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00025.x
37.
WoodW.NealD. (2016). Healthy through habit: Interventions for initiating and maintaining health behavior change. Behavioral Science and Policy, 2(1), 77–83.
YangZ.McComasK.GayG.LeonardJ.DannenbergA.DillonH. (2010). Applying the theory of planned behavior to study health decisions related to potential risks. Journal of Risk Research, 13(8), 1007–1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.488743
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
