In public discourse on the environment, scientific knowledge is often mediated by metaphors. In this article, the authors are concerned with the role of metaphors in the communication of biodiversity loss. More specifically, their examination focuses on such popular metaphors as “the library of life,” “biotic holocaust,” and “the Holy Grail” and on the role of these metaphors in putting biodiversity loss on the global environmental agenda. These metaphors reflect two opposite narratives on environmental politics: the apocalyptic narrative of species extinction and the new narrative of hope that looks at genetic engineering.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baumann, M., J. Bell, F. Koechlin, and M. Pimbert, eds. 1996. The life industry: Biodiversity, people and profits. London: Intermediate Technology.
2.
Black, M.1962. Models and metaphors: Studies in language and philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
3.
Bono, J.1990. Science, discourse, and literature. The role/rule of metaphor in science. In Literature and science: Theory & practice, edited by S. Peterfreund, 59-89. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
4.
Bowker, G.2000. Biodiversity datadiversity. Social Studies of Science30 (5): 643-683.
5.
Bucchi, M.1998. Science and the media: Alternative routes in scientific communication. London: Routledge.
6.
Cheng, V.1995. 328 useful drugs are said to lie hidden in tropical forests. The New York Times, 27 June, p. C4-c4.
7.
Chiappe, D. L.1998. Similarity, relevance, and the comparison process. Metaphor and Symbol13 (1): 17-30.
8.
Collins, C., and S. Kephart. 1995. Science as news: The emergence and framing of biodiversity. Mass Communication Review22 (1-2): 21-45.
9.
Ehrlich, P. R.1992. Environmental deterioration, biodiversity and the preservation of civilization. Environmentalist12 (1): 9-14.
10.
Evans, P.1992. Environment post Rio: What is this thing called life?The Guardian, 21 August, p. 23-23.
11.
Evans, P.1993. Agenda: Survival has become a matter of economics. The Guardian, 21 May, p. 19-19.
12.
Fernandez, J., ed. 1991. Beyond metaphor: The theory of tropes in anthropology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
13.
Gray, K.1993. The ambivalence of property. In Threats without enemies: Facing environmental insecurity, edited by G. Prins, 150-170. London: Earthscan.
14.
Haila, Y.1999. Biodiversity and the divide between culture and nature. Biodiversity and Conservation8:165-181.
15.
Hajer, M.1995. The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
16.
Hannigan, J.1995. Environmental sociology: A social constructionist perspective. London: Routledge.
17.
Hellsten, I.2000. Dolly: Scientific breakthrough or Frankenstein's monster? Scientific and journalistic metaphors of cloning. Metaphor and Symbol15 (4): 213-221.
18.
Hesse, M.1970. The explanatory function of metaphor. In Logic, methodology and philosophy in science, edited by Y. Bar-Hillel, 249-259. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North-Holland.
19.
Heywood, V. H., and R. T. Watson, eds. 1995. Global biodiversity assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Jeffries, M.1997. Biodiversity and conservation. London: Routledge.
21.
Kaennel, M.1998. Biodiversity: A diversity in definition. In Assessment of biodiversity for improved forest planning, edited by P. Bachmann et al., 71-81. Joensuu, Finland: European Forest Institute.
22.
Kay, L.1999. In the beginning was the word? The genetic code and the book of life. In The science studies reader, edited by M. Bagioli, 224-233. London: Routledge.
23.
Killingsworth, M. J., and J. S. Palmer. 1992. Ecospeak: Rhetoric and environmental politics in America. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
24.
Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
25.
Lewis, T.2000. Media representations of “sustainable development.”Science Communication21:244-273.
26.
Livesey, S.1999. McDonald's and the Environmental Defense Fund: A case study of a green alliance. Journal of Business Communication36 (1): 5-39.
27.
Luoma, J. R.1991.Taxonomy, lacking in prestige, may be nearing a renaissance. The New York Times, 10 December, p. C4-C4.
28.
Maasen, S.1994. Who is afraid of metaphors? In Biology as society, society as biology: Metaphors, edited by S. Maasen, E. Mendelsohn, and P. Weingart, 11-35. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
29.
Maasen, S., and P. Weingart. 1995. Metaphors—Messengers of meaning: A contribution to an evolutionary sociology of science. Science Communication17:9-31.
30.
Maasen, S., and P. Weingart. 2000. Metaphors and the dynamics of knowledge. London: Routledge.
31.
Macnaghten, P., and J. Urry. 1998. Contested natures. London: Sage Ltd.
32.
Mayr, E.1982. The growth of biological thought: Diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
33.
Mazur, A., and J. Lee. 1993. Sounding the global alarm: Environmental issues in the US national news. Social Studies of Science23:681-720.
34.
Muir, S. A.1994. The web and the spaceship: Metaphors of the environment. ETC: A Review of General Semantics51:145-153.
35.
Murray, M.1993. The value of biodiversity. In Threats without enemies: Facing environmental insecurity, edited by G. Prins, 66-84. London: Earthscan.
36.
Myers, N.1993. For dear life. The Guardian, 10 June, pp. 12-13.
37.
Myers, N.1995. Biodiversity: Bugs in the system. The Guardian, 19 October, p. 8-8.
38.
Myerson, G., and Y. Rydin. 1996. The language of environment: A new rhetoric. London: UCL Press.
39.
Papineau, D.1992. In the footsteps of the dodo. Book review of E. O. Wilson's The Diversity of Life. The New York Times, 4 October, p. 7-7:1-1.
40.
Pearce, D., and D. Moran. 1994. The economic value of biodiversity. London: Earthscan.
41.
Radford, T.1994. Till death us do part. The Guardian, 2 June, p. S6-S6.
42.
Radford, T.1995. World losing three species every hour. The Guardian, 18 February, p. 8-8.
43.
Radford, T.1997. Alarm grows as mankind wipes out species in their thousands. The Guardian,24 October, p. 1-1.
44.
Reid, W. V., A. Sittenfeld, S. A. Laird, D. H. Janzen, C. A. Meyer, M. A. Collin, R. Gamaz, and C. Juma. 1993. Biodiversity prospecting: Using genetic resources for sustainable development. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
45.
Schneider, K.1992. U.S. to reject pact on protection of wildlife and global resources. The New York Times, 29 May, p. 1-1.
46.
Shiva, V.1993. The greening of the global reach. In Global ecology: A new arena of political conflict, edited by W. Sachs, 149-156. London: Zed.
47.
Stevens, W.1991. Species loss: Crisis or false alarm?The New York Times, 20 August, p. C1-C1.
48.
Takacs, D.1996. The idea of biodiversity: Philosophies of paradise. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
49.
Tuxill, J.1998. Losing strands in the web of life. Worldwatch Paper 141. Washington, DC: Worldwatch Institute.
50.
UK Systematics Forum. 1998. The web of life: A strategy for systematic biology in the United Kingdom. London: UK Systematics Forum.
51.
Väliverronen, E.1998. Biodiversity and the power of metaphor in environmental issues. Science Studies11 (1): 19-34.
52.
von Weiszäcker, C.1996. Biodiversity newspeak. In The life industry: Biodiversity, people and profits, edited by M. Baumann, J. Bell, F. Koechlin, and M. Pimbert, 53-68. London: Intermediate Technology.
53.
Weingart, P., A. Engels, and P. Pansegrau. 2000. Risks of communication: Discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media. Public Understanding of Science9:261-283.
54.
Weingart, P., and P. Pansegrau. 1999. Reputation in science and prominence in the media: The Goldhagen debate. Public Understanding of Science8:1-16.
55.
Wilson, E. O., ed. 1988. Biodiversity. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
56.
Wilson, E. O., ed. 1992. The diversity of life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57.
World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our common future. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
58.
Yoon, C. K.1995. Monumental inventory of insects in a Costa Rican forest is under way. The New York Times, 11 July, p. C4-C4.
