Artwork created by children can effectively communicate science content, especially for topics that are of universal concern for the public but may cause apprehension, like climate change. This commentary describes artwork from a youth art contest about climate change in which the winning art was displayed on public buses. Young artists learned about climate science while creating images that adults and youth easily engaged with in public spaces. Thus, we suggest that connecting youth with science through art, and then using youth-generated art to engage the general public in science learning can be an effective vehicle for science communication.
BurkittE. (2004). Drawing conclusions from children’s art. Psychologist, 17(10), 566–569.
6.
BuschK. C.OsborneJ. (2013). Can we get “there” from “here”? An argument for improved climate science education through Texas state adoption of the next generation science standards. Texas Education Review, 1, 196–208.
FalkJ.DierkingL. (2012). Lifelong science learning for adults: The role of free-choice experiences. Second International Handbook of Science Education, 24, 1063–1079.
9.
FisherS. R. (2016). Life trajectories of youth committing to climate activism. Environmental Education Research, 22(2), 229–247.
10.
FloraJ. A.SaphirM.LappeM.Roser-RenoufC.MaibachE. W.LeiserowitzA. A. (2014). Evaluation of a national high school entertainment education program: The Alliance for Climate Education. Climatic Change, 127, 419–434.
11.
HaynesK.TannerT. M. (2015). Empowering young people and strengthening resilience: Youth-centered participatory video as a tool for climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction. Children’s Geographies, 13(3), 357–371.
12.
HermanB.FeldmanA.Vernaza-HernandezV. (2017). Florida and Puerto Rico secondary science teachers’ knowledge and teaching of climate change science. International Journal of Science and Math Education, 15, 451–471.
13.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2007). Synthesis report: Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar4/syr/
LowmanM. (2014). Ecoliteracy in informal science education settings. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 12(8), 474–475.
18.
OversbyJ. (2015). Teachers’ learning about climate change education. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 167, 23–27.
19.
OzsoyS.AhiB. (2014). Elementary school students’ perceptions of the future environment through artwork. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14, 1570–1582.
SabherwalA.BallewM. T.LindenS. V. D.GustafsonA.GoldbergM. H.MaibachE. W.KotcherJ. E.SwimJ. K.RosenthalS. A.LeiserowitzA. (2020). The Greta Thunberg effect: Familiarity with Greta Thunberg predicts intentions to engage in climate activism in the United States. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 51(1), 1–13.
22.
SternP. (2012). Psychology: Fear and hope in climate messages. Nature Climate Change, 2, 572–573.
23.
TimmisK.TimmisJ.FranziskaJ. (2020). The urgent need for microbiology literacy in society: Children as educators. Microbial Biotechnology, 13(5), 1300–1303.
24.
TrottC. D. (2019). Reshaping our world: Collaborating with children for community-based climate change action. Action Research, 17(1), 42–62.
WiseB. (2010). The online learning imperative: A solution to three looming crises in education. Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 76(3), 52–58.
