Scientists overwhelmingly agree that climate change exists and is caused by human activity. It has been argued that communicating the consensus can counter climate scepticism, given that perceived scientific consensus is a major factor predicting public belief that climate change is anthropogenic. However, individuals may hold different models of science, potentially affecting their interpretation of scientific consensus. Using representative surveys in the United Kingdom, France, Germany and Norway, we assessed whether the relationship between perceived scientific consensus and belief in anthropogenic climate change is conditioned by a person’s viewing science as ‘the search for truth’ or as ‘debate’. Results show that perceived scientific consensus is higher among climate change believers and moreover, significantly predicts belief in anthropogenic climate change. This relationship is stronger among people holding a model of science as the ‘search for truth’. These results help to disentangle the effect of implicit epistemological assumptions underlying the public understanding of the climate change debate.
AntillaL (2005) Climate of scepticism: US newspaper coverage of the science of climate change. Global Environmental Change15(4): 338–352.
2.
ArnoldABöhmGCornerAMaysCPidgeonNPoortingaW, et al. (2016) European Perceptions of Climate Change. Socio-Political Profiles to Inform a Cross-national Survey in France, Germany, Norway and the UK. Oxford: Climate Outreach.
3.
BaconF (1981 [1620]) The basis of induction. In: TweneyRDohertyMMynattC (eds) On Scientific Thinking. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, pp. 293–299.
4.
BakerS (2007) Sustainable development as symbolic commitment: Declaratory politics and the seductive appeal of ecological modernisation in the European Union. Environmental Politics16(2): 297–317.
5.
BergkvistLRossiterJR (2007) The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. Journal of Marketing Research44(2): 175–184.
6.
BertoldoRMaysCPoumadèreMSchneiderNSvendsenC (2016) Great deeds or great risks? Scientists’ social representations of nanotechnology. Journal of Risk Research19: 760–779.
7.
BostromABöhmGO’ConnorRO (2018) Communicating risks: Principles and challenges. In: RaueMLermerEStreicherB (eds) Psychological Aspects of Risk and Risk Analysis: Theory, Models, and Applications. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 251–277.
8.
BrechinSR (2003) Comparative public opinion and knowledge on global climatic change and the Kyoto Protocol: The US versus the world?International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy23: 106–134.
9.
CallaghanPAugoustinosM (2013) Reified versus consensual knowledge as rhetorical resources for debating climate change. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale3: 11–38.
10.
CapstickSWhitmarshLPoortingaW (2015) International trends in public perceptions of climate change over the past quarter century. Wires Climate Change6: 35–61.
11.
CookJOreskesNDoranPTAndereggWRLVerheggenBMaibachW, et al. (2016) Consensus on consensus: A synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming. Environmental Research Letters11(4): 048002.
12.
DemskiCButlerCParkhillKASpenceAPidgeonNF (2015) Public values for energy system change. Global Environmental Change34: 59–69.
13.
DunlapREMcCrightAM (2008) A widening gap: Republican and democratic views on climate change. Environment50(5): 26–35.
14.
EngelsAHütherOSchäferMHeldH (2013) Public climate-change skepticism, energy preferences and political participation. Global Environmental Change23(5): 1018–1027.
HayesAF (2013) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
17.
HayesAFMatthesJ (2009) Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods41(3): 924–936.
18.
HornseyMJHarrisEABainPGFieldingKS (2016) Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nature Climate Change6: 622–626.
19.
JaspalRNerlichBKoteykoN (2012) Contesting science by appealing to its norms: Readers discuss climate science in the daily mail. Science Communication35(3): 383–410.
20.
KahanDM (2017) The ‘gateway belief’ illusion: Reanalyzing the results of a scientific-consensus messaging study. Journal of Science Communication16(5): 1–20.
21.
KahanDMBramanDSlovicPGastilJCohenG (2009) Cultural cognition of the risks and benefits of nanotechnology. Nature Nanotechnology4: 87–90.
22.
KahanDMJenkins-SmithHBramanD (2011) Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research14(2): 147–174.
23.
KahanDMPetersEWittlinMSlovicPOuelletteLLBramanD, et al. (2012) The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Climate Change2(10): 732–735.
24.
KuhnT (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
25.
KuhnT (1995) Scientists and their worldviews. In: AndersonWT (ed.) The Truth about the Truth: De-confusing and Re-constructing the Postmodern World. New York, NY: Tarcher/Putnam, pp. 189–198.
26.
KvaløyBFinseraasHListhaugO (2012) The publics’ concern for global warming: A cross-national study of 47 countries. Journal of Peace Research49(1): 11–22.
27.
LantianAMullerDNurraCDouglasKM (2016) Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: Validation of a French and English Single-Item Scale. International Review of Social Psychology29: 1–14.
28.
LeeTMMarkowitzEMHowePDKoC-YLeiserowitzAA (2015) Risk perception around the world. Nature Climate Change5: 1014–1020.
29.
LeiserowitzAA (2005) American risk perceptions: Is climate change dangerous?Risk Analysis25(6): 1433–1442.
LewandowskySGignacGEVaughanS (2012) Supplementary information: The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science. Nature Climate Change3(4): 399–404.
32.
LorenzoniILeiserowitzADoriaMDFPoortingaWPidgeonNF (2006) Cross-national comparisons of image associations with ‘global warming’ and ‘climate change’ among laypeople in the United States of America and Great Britain. Journal of Risk Research9(3): 265–281.
33.
McCrightAMDunlapREMarquart-PyattST (2016) Political ideology and views about climate change in the European Union. Environmental Politics25(2): 338–358.
34.
McCrightAMDunlapREXiaoC (2013) Perceived scientific agreement and support for government action on climate change in the USA. Climatic Change119(2): 511–518.
35.
MoscoviciS (1988) Notes towards a description of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology18: 211–250.
36.
MoscoviciS (2001) Why a theory of social representations? In: DeauxKPhilogèneG (eds) Representation of the Social. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 8–36.
37.
NewtonI (1981 [1704]) On the use of hypotheses. In: TweneyRDohertyMMynattC (eds) On Scientific Thinking, New York, NY: Columbia University Press, pp. 63–65.
38.
PidgeonN (2012) Climate change risk perception and communication: Addressing a critical moment?Risk Analysis32(6): 951–956.
39.
PoortingaWSpenceAWhitmarshLCapstickSPidgeonNF (2011) Uncertain climate: An investigation into public scepticism about anthropogenic climate change. Global Environmental Change21(3): 1015–1024.
40.
PreacherKJHayesAF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods40(3): 879–891.
41.
RabinovichAMortonTA (2012) Unquestioned answers or unanswered questions: Beliefs about science guide responses to uncertainty in climate change risk communication. Risk Analysis32(6): 992–1002.
42.
SmithNLeiserowitzA (2012) The rise of global warming skepticism: Exploring affective image associations in the United States over time. Risk Analysis32(6): 1021–1032.
43.
SorellT (2013) Scientism: Philosophy and the Infatuation with Science. London: Routledge.
44.
SteentjesKPidgeonNPoortingaWPoortingaWCornerAJArnoldABöhmG, et al. (2017) European Perceptions of Climate Change (EPCC): Topline findings of a survey conducted in four European countries in 2016. Project report submitted to the Joint Programme Initiative (JPI)-Climate, Cardiff University, Cardiff. Available at: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/id/eprint/98660
45.
TranterBBoothK (2015) Scepticism in a changing climate: A cross-national study. Global Environmental Change33: 154–164.
46.
van der LindenSLeiserowitzAMaibachE (2017) Scientific agreement can neutralize politicization of facts. Nature Human Behaviour2: 2–3.
47.
van der LindenSLLeiserowitzAAFeinbergGDMaibachEW (2015) The scientific consensus on climate change as a gateway belief: Experimental evidence. PLoS ONE10(2): 2–9.
48.
WhitmarshL (2011) Scepticism and uncertainty about climate change: Dimensions, determinants and change over time. Global Environmental Change21(2): 690–700.
