Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This is a call to science communicators and science journalists to feature social science research and researchers in their reporting, with an emphasis on anthropology and its potential to increase public empathy, improve the quality of public discourse, and contribute to contextual and narrative news trends.

Keywords

social science communication anthropology narrative news empathy contextual news

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Academy of Arts and Sciences. (2018). Perceptions of science in America: A report from the Public Face of Science Initiative.

American Alliance of Museums. (2017, May 1). Empathy a mile in my shoes: Closing the empathy deficit. https://www.aam-us.org/2017/05/01/empathy-a-mile-in-my-shoes-closing-the-empathy-deficit/

Baron

(2010). Escape from the ivory tower: A guide to making your science matter. Island Press.

Barton

K. C.

McCully

A. W.

(2012). Trying to “see things differently”: Northern Ireland students’ struggle to understand alternative historical perspectives. Theory & Research in Social Education, 40(4), 371-408. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2012.710928

Bolsen

Shapiro

M. A.

(2018). The US news media, polarization on climate change, and pathways to effective communication. Environmental Communication, 12(2), 149-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1397039

Burgess

van Ryn

Dovidio

Saha

(2007). Reducing racial bias among health care providers: Lessons from social-cognitive psychology. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22(6), 882-887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0160-1

Cassidy

(2008). Communicating the social sciences. In Bucchi

Trench

(Eds.), Handbook of public communication of science and technology (pp. 225-236). Routledge.

Cassidy

(2014). Communicating the social sciences: A specific challenge? In Bucchi

Trench

(Eds.), Routledge handbook of public communication of science and technology (2nd ed., pp. 186-197). Routledge.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014). Practical strategies for culturally competent evaluation. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

10.

Dahlstrom

M. F.

(2014). Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(Suppl. 4), 13614-13620. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320645111

11.

De León

(2016, April 1). Notes from a crime scene. SAPIENS. https://www.sapiens.org/culture/living-and-dying-on-the-migrant-trail/

12.

Eriksen

T. H.

(2006). Engaging anthropology: The case for a public presence. Berg.

13.

Falk

J. H.

Dierking

L. D.

(2010). The 95 percent solution. American Scientist, 98(6), 486-493.

14.

Fisher

A. K.

(2017). Transforming thinking transforms lives. Journal of Contemporary Education, 6(1), Article 5. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/jcre/vol6/iss1/5

15.

Funk

Gottfried

Mitchell

(2017, September 20). Science news and information today. https://www.journalism.org/2017/09/20/science-news-and-information-today/

16.

Guenther

Joubert

Weingart

(2016, August 13). Science communication is on the rise—and that’s good for democracy. The Conversation. http://theconversation.com/science-communication-is-on-the-rise-and-thats-good-for-democracy-62842

17.

Hermann

A. K.

(2016). Ethnographic journalism. Journalism, 17(2), 260-278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884914555964

18.

Hollan

(2008). Being there: On the imaginative aspects of understanding others and being understood. Ethos, 36(4), 475-489. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1352.2008.00028.x

19.

Kennedy

Hefferon

(2019, March 28). What Americans know about science. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2019/03/28/what-americans-know-about-science/

20.

KQED. (2018). Cracking the millennial code: A study on the science media habits and cultural beliefs of millennials, the most science curious adult generation in the U.S. http://ww2.kqed.org/pressroom/wp-content/uploads/sites/63/2019/04/KQED-Surveys-FINAL041619-2.pdf

21.

Le Masurier

(2015). What is slow journalism? Journalism Practice, 9(2), 138-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.916471

22.

Levine

F. J.

Abler

R. F.

Rosich

K. J.

(2004). Education and training in the social, behavioral, and economic sciences: A plan of action. A Report to the National Science Foundation. https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2004/nsf0442/nsf0442.pdf

23.

Long

(2013, June 24). The rise of contextual journalism, 1950s-2000s. https://journalistsresource.org/studies/society/news-media/rise-contextual-journalism-1950s-2000s/

24.

Mohr

Sørensen

B. R.

Weisdorf

(2019). The ethnography of things military—Empathy and critique in military anthropology. Ethnos. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2019.1687553

25.

Nasser

(2018, November 20). The world’s biggest scavenger hunt: A guide to finding stories. https://transom.org/2018/latif-nasser/

26.

National Science Board. (2018). Science and engineering indicators 2018 (NSB-2018-1). National Science Foundation. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/indicators/

27.

Oliver

M. B.

Dillard

J. P.

Bae

Tamul

D. J.

(2012). The effect of narrative news format on empathy for stigmatized groups. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(2), 205-224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699012439020

28.

Patterson

(2013). Informing the news: The need for knowledge-based journalism. Vintage Books.

29.

Pew Research Center. (2014, June 12). Political polarization in the American public. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2014/06/12/political-polarization-in-the-american-public/

30.

Schäfer

M. S.

(2012). Taking stock: A meta-analysis of studies on the media’s coverage of science. Public Understanding of Science, 21(6), 650-663. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510387559

31.

Schultz

P. W.

(2000). New environmental theories: Empathizing with nature: The effects of perspective taking on concern for environmental issues. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 391-406. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00174

32.

Small

M. L.

(2019). Rhetoric and social science in a polarized society. Presented at the American Educational Research Association, Spencer Lecture, Toronto, Canada. https://www.spencer.org/news/aera-2019

33.

Stray

(2013, May 22). Objectivity and the decades-long shift from “just the facts” to “what does it mean?” https://www.niemanlab.org/2013/05/objectivity-and-the-decades-long-shift-from-just-the-facts-to-what-does-it-mean/

34.

Teixeira de Melo

(2020). An operational framework for complex thinking. In Teixeira de Melo

(Ed.), Performing complexity: Building foundations for the practice of complex thinking (pp. 49-63). Springer International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46245-1_4

35.

Watson

C. W.

(1999). Being there: Fieldwork in anthropology. Pluto Press.

36.

Wendland

M. W.

Robinson

Williams

P. A.

(2015). Thick critical thinking: Toward a new classroom pedagogy. In Davies

Barnett

(Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education (pp. 153-168). Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378057_10

37.

Wihbey

(2012, July 3). Effect of narrative news format on empathy for stigmatized groups. https://journalistsresource.org/studies/society/news-media/effect-narrative-news-format-empathy-stigmatized-groups/

38.

Yeager

E. A.

Foster

S. J.

(2001). The role of empathy in the development of historical understanding. In Davis

O. L.