Despite concerns about politicization and polarization in climate change news, previous work has not been able to offer evidence concerning long-term trends. Using computer-assisted content analyses of all climate change articles from major newspapers in the United States between 1985 and 2017, we find that media representations of climate change have become (a) increasingly politicized, whereby political actors are increasingly featured and scientific actors less so and (b) increasingly polarized, in that Democratic and Republican discourses are markedly different. These findings parallel trends in U.S. public opinion, pointing to these features of news coverage as polarizing influences on climate attitudes.
BolsenT.DruckmanJ. N.CookF. L. (2014). How frames can undermine support for scientific adaptations: Politicization and the status-quo bias. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nft044
4.
BoykoffM. T. (2007). Flogging a dead norm? Newspaper coverage of anthropogenic climate change in the United States and United Kingdom from 2003 to 2006. Area, 39(4), 470-481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2007.00769.x
5.
BoykoffM. T. (2011). Who speaks for the climate? Making sense of media reporting on climate change. Cambridge University Press.
BoykoffM. T.BoykoffJ. M. (2007). Climate change and journalistic norms: A case-study of US mass-media coverage. Geoforum, 38(6), 1190-1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.01.008
BrüggemannM. (2017). Post-normal journalism: Climate journalism and its changing contribution to an unsustainable debate. In OtsM.BerglezP.OlaussonU. (Eds.), What is sustainable journalism?: integrating the environmental, social, and economic challenges of journalism (pp. 57-74). Peter Lang.
10.
BrüggemannM.EngesserS. (2014). Between consensus and denial: Climate journalists as interpretive community. Science Communication, 36(4), 399-427. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547014533662
11.
BrulleR. J.CarmichaelJ.JenkinsJ. C. (2012). Shifting public opinion on climate change: An empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the U.S., 2002-2010. Climatic Change, 114(2), 169-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0403-y
12.
CarmichaelJ. T.BrulleR. J.HuxsterJ. K. (2017). The great divide: understanding the role of media and other drivers of the partisan divide in public concern over climate change in the USA, 2001–2014. Climatic Change, 141(4), 599-612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-1908-1
DruckmanJ. N.PetersonE.SlothuusR. (2013). How elite partisan polarization affects public opinion formation. American Political Science Review, 107(1), 57-79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055412000500
15.
DunlapR. E.McCrightA. M. (2008). A widening gap: Republican and democratic views on climate change. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 50(5), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.50.5.26-35
16.
DunlapR. E.McCrightA. M.YaroshJ. H. (2016). The political divide on climate change: Partisan polarization widens in the U.S. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 58(5), 4-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2016.1208995
FeinererI.HornikK.MeyerD. (2008). Text mining infrastructure in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 25(5), 1-54. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v025.i05
19.
FeldmanL.HartP. S.MilosevicT. (2017). Polarizing news? Representations of threat and efficacy in leading US newspapers’ coverage of climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 26(4), 481-497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515595348
20.
FeldmanL.MaibachE.Roser-RenoufC.LeiserowitzA. (2012). Climate on cable: The nature and impact of global warming coverage on Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC. International Journal of Press and Politics, 17(1), 3-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161211425410
21.
GibsonT. A.CraigR. T.HarperA. C.AlpertJ. M. (2016). Covering global warming in dubious times: Environmental reporters in the new media ecosystem. Journalism, 17(4), 417-434. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884914564845
22.
GuberD. L. (2013). A cooling climate for change? Party polarization and the politics of global warming. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(1), 93-115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212463361
HartP. S.FeldmanL. (2014). Threat without efficacy? Climate change on U.S. network news. Science Communication, 36(3), 325-351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547013520239
25.
HartP. S.NisbetE. C. (2012). Boomerang effects in science communication: How motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. Communication Research, 39(6), 701-723. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211416646
26.
HilesS. S.HinnantA. (2014). Climate change in the newsroom: Journalists’ evolving standards of objectivity when covering global warming. Science Communication, 36(4), 428-453. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547014534077
27.
KlüverH. (2011). The contextual nature of lobbying: Explaining lobbying success in the European Union. European Union Politics, 12(4), 483-506. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116511413163
LeiserowitzA. A.MaibachE. W.Roser-RenoufC.SmithN.DawsonE. (2013). Climategate, public opinion, and the loss of trust. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(6), 818-837. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212458272
30.
MayerA.SmithE. K. (2017). Education, political affiliation and energy policy in the United States: A case of Tea Party exceptionalism?Energy Research & Social Science, 23(2017), 74-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.12.002
31.
McCrightA. M.DunlapR. E. (2003). Defeating Kyoto: The Conservative Movement’s impact on U.S. climate change policy. Social Problems, 50(3), 348-373. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2003.50.3.348
32.
McCrightA. M.DunlapR. E. (2011). The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001-2010. Sociological Quarterly, 52, 155-194.
33.
McCrightA. M.DunlapR. E.XiaoC. (2014). Increasing influence of party identification on perceived scientific agreement and support for government action on climate change in the united states, 2006-12. Weather, Climate, and Society, 6(2), 194-201. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-13-00058.1
34.
MontpetitÉ.HarveyA. (2018). Environmental communication media storms and policy expertise: How environmental beat journalists gained influence during a shale gas controversy. Environmental Communication, 12(7), 895-910. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1495092
NisbetM. C. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51(2), 12-23. https://doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12-23
ProkschS. O.SlapinJ. B. (2010). Position taking in european parliament speeches. British Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 587-611. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123409990299
39.
Schmid-PetriH.AdamS.SchmuckiI.HäusslerT. (2015). A changing climate of skepticism: The factors shaping climate change coverage in the US press. Public Understanding of Science, 26(4), 498-513. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515612276
40.
SlapinJ. B.ProkschS.-O. (2008). A scaling model for estimating time-serial positions from texts. American Journal of Political Science, 52(3), 705-722. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00338.x
41.
SlothuusR.De VreeseC. H. (2010). Political parties, motivated reasoning, and issue framing effects. Journal of Politics, 72(3), 630-645. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002238161000006X
42.
TrumboC. (1996). Constructing climate change: Claims and frames in US news coverage of an environmental issue. Public Understanding of Science, 5(3), 269-283. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/5/3/006
WiestS. L.RaymondL.ClawsonR. A. (2015). Framing, partisan predispositions, and public opinion on climate change. Global Environmental Change, 31(March), 187-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.12.006
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
