When Scientists Tweet for Social Changes: Dialogic Communication and Collective Mobilization Strategies by Flint Water Study Scientists on Twitter

Abstract

Guided by the literature in social media and science activism, this exploratory study examined how scientists from Virginia Tech, known as the Flint Water Study team, utilized Twitter to communicate and mobilize the public in response to the contamination of water with lead in Flint, Michigan. Results from the content analysis indicated that the scientists utilized Twitter mainly to provide scientific information to the public and that public education was their main advocacy tactic. This study offers insights into how this particular group of science activists utilized social media for collective actions and suggests future directions for science communication on social media.

Keywords

activism politico-scientists science activism Flint Water Crisis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Auger

G. A.

(2013). Fostering democracy through social media: Evaluating diametrically opposed nonprofit advocacy organizations’ use of Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube. Public Relations Review, 39, 369-376. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.07.013

Bennett

(2003). Communicating global activism. Information, Communication & Society, 6, 143-168. doi:10.1080/1369118032000093860a

Bortree

D. S.

Seltzer

(2009). Dialogic strategies and outcomes: An analysis of environmental advocacy groups’ Facebook profiles. Public Relations Review, 35, 317-319. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.05.002

Brown

(1992). Popular epidemiology and toxic waste contamination: Lay and professional ways of knowing. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 33, 267-281.

Crable

R. E.

Vibbert

S. L.

(1985). Managing issues and influencing public policy. Public Relations Review, 11(2), 3-16. doi:10.1016/S0363-8111(82)80114-8

Eagan

(2016, February 9). Bacteria fears left Flint’s water pipes inprotected. Detroit Free Press. Retrieved from http://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/flint-water-crisis/2016/02/09/flint-corrosion-control-omitted-over-bacteria-concerns/80072284/

Earl

McKee-Hurwitz

Mesinas

A. M.

Tolan

Arlotti

(2013). This protest will be tweeted: Twitter and protest policing during the Pittsburgh G20. Information, Communication & Society, 16, 459-478. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.777756

Edge

Eyles

(2015). Contested governmentalities: NGO enrollment and influence over chemical risk governance rationales and practices. Environmental Policy and Governance, 25, 188-200. doi:10.1002/eet.1671

Feldscher

(2016, January 26). Flint’s Water Crisis ‘Infuriating’ Given Knowledge about Lead Poisoning. Retrieved from https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/features/flints-water-crisis-infuriating-given-knowledge-about-lead-poisoning/

10.

Flint Water Study. (2015). MDEQ to Congressman Kildee, Sen. Ananich and State Reps: City has no unresolved violations of state and federal drinking water standards. Retrieved from http://flintwaterstudy.org/2015/09/mdeq-to-congressman-kildee-sen-ananich-and-state-reps-city-has-no-unresolved-violations-of-state-and-federal-drinking-water-standards/

11.

Flint Water Study. (2016). The Virginia Tech Research Team. Retrieved from http://flintwaterstudy.org/about-page/about-us/

12.

Freelon

McIlwain

C. D.

Clark

M. D.

(2016, February 29). Beyond the hashtags: #Ferguson, #Blacklivesmatter, and the online Struggle for Offline Justice. Center for Media & Social Impact, American University. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2747066

13.

Frickel

(2004a). Building an interdiscipline: Collective action framing and the rise of genetic toxicology. Social Problems, 51, 269-287. doi:10.1525/sp.2004.51.2.269

14.

Frickel

(2004b). Just science? Organizing scientist activism in the US environmental justice movement. Science as Culture, 13, 449-469. doi:10.1080/0950543042000311814

15.

Grossman

D. S.

Slusky

D. J. G.

(2017). The effect of an increase in lead in the water system on fertility and birth outcomes: The case of Flint, Michigan. Morgantown: West Virginia University. Retrieved from https://www2.ku.edu/~kuwpaper/2017Papers/201703.pdf

16.

Guo

Saxton

G. D.

(2010). Voice-in, voice-out: Constituent participation and non-profit advocacy. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 1(1), 2154-3358. doi:10.2202/2154-3348.1000

17.

Guo

Saxton

G. D.

(2014). Tweeting social change: How social media are changing nonprofit advocacy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43, 57-79. doi:10.1177/0899764012471585

18.

Harlow

Guo

(2014). Will the revolution be tweeted or Facebooked? Using digital communication tools in immigrant activism. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 463-478. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12062

19.

Hayes

A. F.

Krippendorff

(2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1, 77-89. doi:10.1080/19312450709336664

20.

Hess

D. J

. (2005). Technology and product-oriented movements: Approximating social movement studies and science and technology studies. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 30, 515-535. doi:10.1177/0162243905276499

21.

Hinsley

Lee

(2015). #Ferguson strategic messaging: How local journalists and activists used Twitter as a communication tool. Journal of the International Symposium on Online Journalism, 5(1), 124-146.

22.

Irwin

Wynne

(1996). Introduction. In Irwin

Wynne

(Eds.), Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology (pp. 1-17). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.

23.

Hohn

(2016, August 16). Flint’s water crisis and the ‘troublemaker’ scientist. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/21/magazine/flints-water-crisis-and-the-troublemaker-scientist.html

24.

Huang

Sun

(2014). Weibo network, information diffusion and implications for collective action in China. Information, Communication & Society, 17, 86-104. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.853817

25.

Jackson

(1982). Tactics of confrontation. In Nagelschmidt

J. S.

(Ed.), The public affairs handbook (pp. 221-220). New York, NY: American Management Association.

26.

Jaques

(2006). Activist “rules” and the convergence with issue management. Journal of Communication Management, 10, 407-420. doi:10.1108/13632540610714836

27.

Kent

M. L.

Taylor

(1998). Building dialogic relationships through the world wide web. Public Relations Review, 24, 321-334. doi:10.1016/S0363-8111(99)80143-X

28.

Kent

M. L.

Taylor

White

W. J.

(2003). The relationship between web site design and organizational responsiveness to stakeholders. Public Relations Review, 29(1), 63-77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(02)00194-7

29.

Lachlan

K. A.

Westerman

D. K.

Spence

P. R.

(2010). Disaster news and subsequent information seeking: Exploring the role of spatial presence and perceptual realism. Electronic News, 4(4), 203-217. doi:10.1177/1931243110387092

30.

Leber

(2016, January 22). The EPA’s silent, guilty role in the Flint water crisis. New Republic. Retrieved from https://newrepublic.com/article/128156/epas-silent-guilty-role-flint-water-crisis

31.

Lee

N. M.

VanDyke

M. S.

Cummins

R. G.

(2017). A missed opportunity? NOAA’s use of social media to communicate climate science. Environmental Communication, 1-10. doi:10.1080/17524032.2016.1269825

32.

Leitch

Neilson

(2001). Bringing publics into public relations: New theoretical frameworks for practice. In Heath

R. L.

(Ed.), Handbook of public relations (pp. 127-138). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

33.

Lin

J. C. F.

Rutter

Park

(2016, January 21). Events that led to Flint’s water crisis. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/01/21/us/flint-lead-water-timeline.html

34.

Lotan

Graeff

Ananny

Gaffney

Pearce

boyd

(2011). The revolutions were tweeted: Information flows during the 2011 Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions. International Journal of Communications, 5, 1375-1405. Retrieved from http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1246/643

35.

Lovejoy

Saxton

G. D.

(2012). Information, community, and action: How nonprofit organizations use social media. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 17, 337-353. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01576.x

36.

Lovejoy

Waters

R. D.

Saxton

G. D.

(2012). Engaging stakeholders through Twitter: How nonprofit organizations are getting more out of 140 characters or less. Public Relations Review, 38, 313-318. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.01.005

37.

Lubitow

(2013). Collaborative frame construction in social movement campaigns: Bisphenol-A (BPA) and scientist–activist mobilization. Social Movement Studies, 12, 429-447. doi:10.1080/14742837.2013.807234

38.

McCormick

(2009). From “politico-scientists” to democratizing science movements: The changing climate of citizens and science. Organization & Environment, 22, 34-51. doi:10.1177/1086026609333419

39.

Neuendorf

K. A.

(2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

40.

Nisbet

M. C.

Scheufele

D. A.

(2009). What’s next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. American Journal of Botany, 96(10), 1767-1778. doi:10.3732/ajb.0900041

41.

Seltzer

Mitrook

M. A.

(2007). The dialogic potential of weblogs in relationship building. Public Relations Review, 33, 227-229. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2007.02.011

42.

Smith

(2016, February 6). As Flint fought to be heard, Virginia Tech team sounded alarm. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/07/us/as-flint-fought-to-be-heard-virginia-tech-team-sounded-alarm.html?_r=0

43.

Smith

M. F.

(2005). Activism. In Heath

R. L.

(Ed.), Encyclopedia of public relations (Vol. 1, pp. 5-9). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

44.

Smith

M. F.

Ferguson

D. P.

(2010). Activism 2.0. In Heath

R. L.

(Ed.), Handbook of public relations (pp. 395-408). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

45.

Sommerfeldt

(2011). Activist online resource mobilization: Relationship building features that fulfill resource dependencies. Public Relations Review, 37, 429-431. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.03.003

46.

Taylor

Das

S. S.

(2010). Public relations in advocacy: Stem cell research organizations’ use of the Internet in resource mobilization. Public Relations Journal, 4(4), 1-22.

47.

Taylor

Kent

M. L.

White

W. J.

(2001). How activist organizations are using the Internet to build relationships. Public Relations Review, 27, 263-284. doi:10.1016/S0363-8111(01)00086-8

48.

The Economist. (2017, September 27). The Water Crisis in Flint, Michigan has had Terrible Consequences for Residents’ Health. Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2017/09/daily-chart-18

49.

Theocharis

Lowe

van Deth

J. W.

García-Albacete

(2015). Using Twitter to mobilize protest action: Online mobilization patterns and action repertoires in the Occupy Wall Street, Indignados, and Aganaktismenoi movements. Information, Communication & Society, 18, 202-220. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.948035

50.

Valenzuela

Arriagada

Scherman

(2012). The social media basis of youth protest behavior: The case of Chile. Journal of Communication, 62, 299-314. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01635.x

51.

Wisniewski

(2016, January 27). Michigan governor names panel to fix Flint’s contaminated water system. Reuters. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/us-michigan-water-idUSKCN0V51UK