The aim of this study is to analyze how students understand scientific dissemination. Educational practice has shown that texts from traditional communication vehicles are attractive to students, and furthermore, students understood topics covered in the resources, assessing the language as simple and easy to understand. The applied methodology and the means of carrying out the activities contributed to a more dynamic learning environment in which possibilities permeated the connections between the proposed content and the students’ daily lives, thus facilitating the understanding of scientific subjects by the students. One of the biggest difficulties was the writing component of the activities.
BuenoW. da C. (2009). Jornalismo científico no Brasil: os desafios de uma longa trajetória. [Scientific journalism in Brazil: The challenges of a long trajectory]. In PortoC. M. (Ed.). Difusão e cultura científica: alguns recortes [Diffusion and scientific culture: Some excerpts] (pp.113-125). http://books.scielo.org/id/68/pdf/porto-9788523209124-06.pdf
3.
DemoP. (2015). Educar pela Pesquisa. [Educating through research]. Autores Associados [Associated Authors].
4.
GouveiaC. A. M. (2009). Texto e gramática: uma introdução à linguística sistémico-funcional. [Text and grammar: An introduction to systemic-functional linguistics]. Matraga: Estudos Linguísticos e Literários[Matraga: Linguistic and literary studies], 16(24), 13-47. https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/matraga/article/view/27795/19916
HolbrookJ. (2010). Education through science as a motivational innovation for science education for all. Science Education International, 21(2), 80-91. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ890663.pdf
7.
JahngM. R.LeeN. (2018). When scientists tweet for social changes: Dialogic communication and collective mobilization strategies by Flint Water Study scientists on Twitter. Science Communication, 40(1), 89-108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547017751948
8.
Lei n. 9.394, de 20 de dezembro de 1996. Estabelece as diretrizes e bases da Educação Nacional. [Law no. 9,394, of December 20, 1996. Establishes the guidelines and bases of National Education]. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l9394.htm
9.
MassaraniL.VieiraC. L.RuizE. B.JayaramanK.S.JoubertM.MartineauN.WrobelP.NathC.VargasM.BaglaP.El-AwadyN.LeiteM.FogL.BritoF. (2004). Guia de Divulgação Científica [Scientific dissemination guide]. SciDev.Net, Secretaria de Ciência e Tecnologia para a Inclusão Social. [Secretariat of Science and Technology for Social Inclusion]. http://www.redpop.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Guia_Divulgacao_Cientifica.pdf
Paulo Montenegro Institute. (2018). Indicador de alfabetismo funcional (Inaf) [Functional literacy indicator]. https://ipm.org.br/
13.
TasciB. G. (2015). Project based learning from elementary school to college, tool: Architecture. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 770-775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.130
